Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 604–629 | Cite as

What Do Refugee Mothers Want in Urban US School Science: Learning from the Perceptions of Science of Three Somali Mothers

  • Nancy Albrecht
  • Bhaskar Upadhyay
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper examines the perceptions of three Somali mothers on science, science topics taught in urban US schools and the challenges that they encountered in dealing with science and their own social and cultural practices. The article focuses on Somali mothers, who were highly interested in articulating how science and science professions could be a path to both the personal and community successes and how science could positively affect Somali girls in the areas of women’s health. As an exploratory case study research, we used grounded theory approach to understand Somali mothers’ perceptions of science. We interviewed the mothers over a year and analyzed data as an iterative and systematic process. The findings of the study show that the Somali mothers perceived science from everyday usefulness points of view rather than science knowledge alone, thus home-science connections were critical to them as Somali mothers. They perceived science as an empowering tool for girls so they could make important decisions about women’s reproductive health issues. A broader implication of this study could be for urban science teachers and educators to modify their science instructional and curricular decisions so science learning is connected to Somali students’ culture and empowers girls.

Keywords

Science education Sociocultural Immigrants Somali Mothers Empowering science 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alters, B. J., & Alters, S. M. (2001). Defending evolution in the classroom: A guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Asghar, A., Wiles, J., & Alters, B. (2010). The origin and evolution of life in Pakistani high school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 44, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atwater, M. M., Freeman, T. B., Butler, M. B., & Draper-Morris, J. (2010). A case study of science teacher candidates’ understandings and actions related to the culturally responsive teaching of ‘other’ students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5, 287–318.Google Scholar
  4. Axford, B. (2007). Parents and their children working together: A Scaffolding Literacy case study. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30, 21–39.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, A. C., Drake, C., Perez, G., & St. Louis, K. (2004). Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher, 33(4), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, W. (1968). The task of the translator [Die Aufgabe des Übersetzers]. In H. Arend & W. Benjamin (Eds.), Illuminations (pp. 69–82). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  7. Betts, J. R., & Lofstrom, M. (2000). The educational attainment of immigrants: trends and implications. In G. J. Borjas (Ed.), Issues in the economics of immigration (pp. 51–117). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. BouJaoude, S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D., & Alters, B. (2011). Biology professors’ and teachers’ positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern society. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyson, B., & Short, D. (2003). Secondary school newcomer programs in the US. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, C. J., & Crippen, K. J. (2016). Designing for culturally responsive science education through professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 470–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Candappa, M. (2000). Building a new life: The role of the school in supporting refugee children. Multicultural Teaching, 19, 28–38.Google Scholar
  13. CARE. (1999). Embracing participation in development: Worldwide experience from CARE’s reproductive health programs. CARE Health and Population Unit.Google Scholar
  14. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiswick, B. R., & DebBurman, N. (2004). Educational attainment: Analysis by immigrant generation. Economics of Education Review, 23, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, D., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Designing for knowledge integration: The impact of instructional time. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 451–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (1995). Producing equal status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collier, V. (1995). Acquiring a second language for school. Reading Rockets. US Department of Education: Office of Special Programs.Google Scholar
  19. Daniel, M. S. (2016). Grappling with culturally responsive pedagogy: A study of elementary-level teacher candidates’ learning across practicum and diversity coursework experiences. The Urban Review, 48, 579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeCapua, A., Smathers, W., & Tang, L. (2007). Schooling interrupted. Educational Leadership, 64, 40–46.Google Scholar
  21. Degni, F., Mazengo, C., Vaskilampi, T., & Essen, B. (2008). Religious beliefs prevailing among Somali men living in Finland regarding the use of condoms by men and that of other forms of contraception by women. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 13, 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Denham, S. A., Brown, C., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2011). ‘Plays nice with others’: Social-emotional learning and academic success: Corrigendum. Early Education and Development, 22, 652–680.Google Scholar
  23. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. London: D. C. Heath & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dewey, J. (2008). The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. In J. Boydston & L. Hahn (Eds.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924 (Vol. 4, pp. 1–215). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1910).Google Scholar
  26. Deyo, N. S. (2012). Cultural traditions and the reproductive health of Somali refugees and immigrants (Unpublished Masters’ Thesis). University of San Francisco: San Francisco.Google Scholar
  27. Dimick, A. S. (2012). Student empowerment in an environmental science classroom: Toward a framework for social justice science education. Science Education, 96, 990–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dooley, K. T., & Thangaperumal, P. (2011). Pedagogy and participation: literacy education for low-literate refugee students of African origin in a western school system. Language and Education, 25, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gadassi, R., & Gati, I. (2009). The effect of gender stereotypes on explicit and implicit career preferences. The Counseling Psychologist, 2009(37), 902–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gang, I. N., Zimmerman, K. F. (1999). Is childlike parent? Educational attainment and ethnic origin. Center for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 57.Google Scholar
  32. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, critical perspectives on literacy and education. New York: New York.Google Scholar
  33. Gettleman, J. (2011, September 15). Famine ravages Somalia in a world less likely to intervene. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/16/world/africa/famine-hits-somalia-in-world-less-likely-to-intervene.html?_r=0.
  34. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  35. González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hagiwara, S., Calabrese Barton, A. C., & Contento, I. (2007). Culture, food, and language: Perspectives from immigrant mothers in school science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 475–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hammond, L. (2001). Notes from California: An anthropological approach to urban science education for language minority families. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 983–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hill, N., Hunt, E., & Hyrkas, K. (2011). Somali women’s health care experiences and beliefs during pregnancy and birth in the United States. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 23, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hirsch, E. D. J. (2001). Seeking breadth and depth in the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 59, 22–25.Google Scholar
  41. Hogg, A. L. (2008). Timeline: Somalia, 1991–2008, from troubled to dire. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/12/timeline-somalia-1991-2008/307190/.
  42. Holder, K. (2004). Is there a balance? Traditional customs and modern birthing in Somaliland. Midwifery Today—International Midwife, pp. 42–43.Google Scholar
  43. Kapteijns, L. (1999). Women’s voices in a man’s world. New Hampshire, USA: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  44. Kennedy, K. M., Rodrigue, K. M., & Davis, S. F. (2000). So you want to teach less in hopes of teaching more. College Student Journal, 34, 626–634.Google Scholar
  45. Ladson- Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). Yes, but how do we do it? Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations, and eliminating racism (pp. 29–42). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  48. Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0:a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leigh, B. & Sorbye, I. (2010). Reproductive health: National strategy and action plan 2010–2015.Google Scholar
  51. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  52. Lotan, R. (2006). Teaching teachers to build equitable classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 45, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Malloy, C. E., & Malloy, W. W. (1998). Issues of culture in mathematics teaching and learning. The Urban Review, 30, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marks, G., & Houston, D. M. (2002). The determinants of young women’s intentions about education, career development and family life. Journal of Education and Work, 15, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McBrien, J. L. (2005). Educational needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 329–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: culture, language and science education for indigenous students. International Journal of Science Education, 2, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 571–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis: Some recent trends. Educational Researcher, 21, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moll, L. C. (2003). Cultural-historical psychology and education research with US Latinos: An example from a study of biliteracy. Paper presented at the Symposium on Cognitive Psychology and Education: A Latin-American perspective, 9th International Conference of the International Associate for Cognitive Education and Psychology, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  60. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moll, L. C., & González, N. (1997). Teachers as social scientists: Learning about culture from household research. In P. M. Hall (Ed.), Race, ethnicity and multiculturalism (pp. 89–114). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  62. Moore, F. M. (2007). Language in science education as a gatekeeper to learning, teaching and professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 319–343.Google Scholar
  63. Niyozov, S., & Pluim, G. (2009). Teachers’ perspectives on the education of Muslim students: A missing voice in Muslim education research. Curriculum Inquiry, 39, 637–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ogbu, J. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Women in scientific careers: Unleashing the potential. Paris: OECD, OECD Library.Google Scholar
  66. Pacheco, M. (2012). Learning in/through everyday resistance: A cultural-historical perspective on community resources and curriculum. Educational Researcher, 41, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Paris, D. (2009). “They’re in my culture, they speak the same way”: African American language in multiethnic high schools. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 428–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prendiville, N. (1998). The role and effectiveness of traditional birth attendants in Somilia. Evaluation and Program Planning, 71, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Quimby, J. L., & DeSantis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women’s career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 54, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rahm, J. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 164–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rodriguez, G. M. (2013). Power and agency in education: Exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37, 87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rosebery, A., Warren, B., Ballenger, C., & Ogonowski, M. (2005). The generative potential of students’ everyday knowledge in learning science. In T. Carpenter & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics and science matters (pp. 55–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  73. Rubin, B. (2003). Unpacking detracking: When progressive pedagogy meets students‟ social worlds. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 539–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ruttner, J. (2006). Refugee children in the UK. Maidenhead UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz, M. C., Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., & Tai, R. H. (2008). Depth versus breadth: How content coverage in high school science courses relates to later success in college science coursework. Science Education, 92, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sleeter, C. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47, 562–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  78. Sutherland, L. A., Beavers, D. P., Kupper, L. L., Bernhardt, A. M., Heatherton, T., & Dalton, M. A. (2008). Like parent, like child: Child food and beverage choices during role playing. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescence Medicine, 162, 1063–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I. & Taggart, B. (2008). Final report from the primary phase: Pre-school, school and family influences on children’s development during Key Stage 2 (7-11) (Publication No. DCSF RR 061). Nottingham, UK: The Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  80. Taskin, O. (2014). An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9, 855–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turunen, H., Tossavainen, K., & Vertio, H. (2005). Upbringing as a way of supporting adolescents’ health learning—views of parents in the Finnish ENHPS. In S. Clift & B. Bruun Jensen (Eds.), The health promoting school: International advances in theory, evaluation and practice. Copenhagen: Danish University of Educational Press.Google Scholar
  82. Upadhyay, B. (2006). Using students’ lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher’s thinking. Science Education, 90, 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Upadhyay, B. (2007). Developing identity in a new space: Challenges to immigrant mothers in science settings. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 500–505.Google Scholar
  84. Upadhyay, B. (2010). Middle school science teachers’ perceptions of social justice: A study of two elementary teachers. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Upadhyay, B. (2017). Understanding race and racism in science through the physics of motion. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  86. Upadhyay, B., Barton, A. C., & Zahur, R. (2005). Teaching science in a poor urban school in Pakistan: Tensions in the life history of a female elementary teacher. Science Education, 89, 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Upadhyay, B., Maruyama, G., & Albrecht, N. (2017). Taking an active stance: How urban elementary students connect sociocultural experiences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 2528–2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Valdés, G. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  89. Vereecken, C., Haerens, L., Bourdeaudhuij, D. I., & Maes, L. (2010). The relationship between children’s home food environment and dietary patterns in childhood and adolescence. Public Health Nutrition, 13, 1729–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Van Voorhis, F. L. (2011). Costs and benefits of family involvement in homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 220–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (2008). Using everyday experience to teach science. In A. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners (pp. 39–50). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
  92. Wright, P. (2000). Balancing breadth versus depth: An impossible task. Studies in Science Education, 35, 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options