Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 875–894 | Cite as

Tracking Students Through Life: A Critical Structural Analysis of Academic Tracking of Mexican Immigrant Students in the United States and Korean Immigrant Students in Japan

  • Kathryn Wagner
  • Laurie Dymes
  • Greg Wiggan
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Students in the United States and Japan from high and middle socioeconomic (SES) backgrounds are afforded greater academic opportunities due to the systemic presence of hegemony in public schools (Darvin and Norton in J Lang Identity Educ 13(2):111–117, 2014). Minority and immigrant students, the majority coming from low SES, are more likely to suffer the negative effects of tracking. This paper explains how Mexican immigrant students in the United States, and Korean students in Japan are tracked into lower-level courses throughout their educational careers. Using critical structuralism as a theoretical framework, the paper analyzes the two educational systems and explains the implications of tracking on students’ access to higher education. The paper presents mediating mechanisms against the negative effects of lower-level tracking, while arguing for college preparatory education for Mexican and Korean immigrants in the U.S. and Japan respectively.

Keywords

Academic tracking Mexican students in the United States Korean students in Japan Immigrant students 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adamson, W. L. (1983). Hegemony and revolution: A study of Antonio Gramsci’s political and cultural theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahn, R. (2009). Schooling minorities: An examination of Dowa and Minzokugakkyu educational models in Japan. In G. Wiggan & C. Hutchison (Eds.), Global issues in education: Pedagogy, policy, school practices, and the minority experience (pp. 259–273). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  3. Alba, R., Sloan, J., & Sperling, J. (2011). The integration imperative: The children of low-status immigrants in the schools of wealthy societies. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1997). Reading capital, 1968 (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Araújo, M. (2007). ‘Modernising the comprehensive principle’: Selection, setting and the institutionalisation of educational failure. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(2), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Au, W. (2013). Coring social studies within corporate education reform: The common core state standards, social justice, and the politics of knowledge in U.S. schools. Critical Education, 4(5). Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/182278
  7. Badkar, M. (2012). Here’s the real economic impact of Mexican immigrants on the US. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/mexican-immigration-us-economy-2012-7
  8. Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Barnhardt, R. (1981). Culture, community and the curriculum. Center for Cross Cultural Studies, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Retrieved from http://ankn.uaf.edu/Curriculum/Articles/RayBarnhardt/CCC.html
  10. Borjian, A., & Padilla, A. M. (2010). Voices from Mexico: How American teachers can meet the needs of Mexican immigrant students. The Urban Review, 42(4), 316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brunello, G., & Rocco, L. (2013). The effect of immigration on the school performance of natives: Cross country evidence using PISA test scores. Economics of Education Review, 32, 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan, J. (2005). Fostering educational resilience and achievement in urban schools through school–family community partnerships. Partnerships/Community, 22. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcepartnerships/22
  14. Callahan, R. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiu, D., Beru, Y., Watley, E., Wubu, S., Simson, E., Kessinger, R., et al. (2008). Influences of math tracking on seventh-grade students’ self-beliefs and social comparisons. Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Common Core State Standards. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/
  18. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2014). Social class, identity, and migrant students. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 13(2), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies, D. (1996). Partnerships for student success. New Schools, New Communities, 12, 14–21.Google Scholar
  20. Deil-Amen, R., & Lopez Turley, R. (2007). A review of the transition to college literature in sociology. Teachers College Record, 109(10), 2324–2366.Google Scholar
  21. Deil-Amen, R., & Tevis, T. L. (2010). Circumscribed agency: The relevance of standardized college entrance exams for low SES high school students. The Review of Higher Education, 33(2), 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. deMarrais, K. B., & LeCompte, M. (1999). The way schools work: A sociological analysis of education. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Douglass, M., & Roberts, G. S. (2015). Japan and global migration: Foreign workers and the advent of a multicultural society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Dynarski, M. (2015). Using research to improve education under the Every Student Succeeds Act. Economic Studies, 1(8), 1–5. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Download-the-paper-6.pdf
  25. Ewell, P. T., Jones, D. P., & Kelly, P. J. (2003). Conceptualizing and researching the educational pipeline (pp. 1–8). National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.Google Scholar
  26. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey, C. J. (2013). Ainu schooling: Self-determination and globalization. In G. DeCoker & C. Bjork (Eds.), Japanese education in an era of globalization: Culture, politics, and equity (pp. 101–114). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Furuto, L. H. (2009). Japanese mathematics achievement and global factors of diversity. In G. Wiggan & C. Hutchison (Eds.), Global issues in education: Pedagogy, policy, practice, and the minority experience (pp. 275–296). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  29. Gramsci, A. (1936). Intellectuals and hegemony. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social theory: The multicultural and classic readings (4th ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  30. Guthrie, J. W., & Springer, M. G. (2004). A nation at risk revisited: Did “wrong” reasoning result in “right” results? At what cost? Peabody Journal of Education, 79(1), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and practice. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harter, S. (1993). Causes and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 87–116). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hester, J. T. (2013). Kids between nations. In S. Ryang (Ed.), Koreans in Japan: Critical voices from the margin (pp. 175–196). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Higher Education Works Foundation. (2016). U.S. lags in a global competition for talent. Retrieved from http://www.higheredworksfoundation.org/2016/08/us-lags-in-global-competition/
  35. Hopkins, M., Martinez-Wenzl, M., Aldana, U. S., & Gándara, P. (2013). Cultivating capital: Latino newcomer young men in a US urban high school. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 44(3), 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hutchinson, C. B. (2011). Understanding diverse learners: Theory and practice. Acton, MA: Copley Custom Textbooks.Google Scholar
  37. Krogstad, J. M. (2015). 5 facts about Latinos and education. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/26/5-facts-about-latinos-and-education/
  38. Krogstad, J. M. (2016). 5 facts about Mexico and immigration to the U.S. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/11/mexico-and-immigration-to-us/
  39. LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 43–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mathison, S., & Ross, E. W. (2002). The hegemony of accountability in schools and universities. Workplace, 9, 88–102.Google Scholar
  42. McGlynn, A. P. (2015). Pew research center reports on Latinos coming of age in America. Pew Research Center: Retrieved from http://www.hispanicoutlook.com/angela-provitera-mcglynn/2015/9/3/pew-research-center-reports-on-latinos-coming-of-age-in-america
  43. Mickelson, R. A. (2015). The cumulative disadvantages of first-and second-generation segregation for middle school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 657–692. doi: 10.3102/0002831215587933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mickelson, R. A., & Nkomo, M. (2012). Integrated schooling, life course outcomes, and social cohesion in multiethnic democratic societies. Review of Research in Education, 36(1), 197–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Migration Policy Institute. (2016). Mexican immigrants in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/mexican-immigrants-united-states
  46. Moorehead, R. (2013). Separate and unequal: The remedial Japanese language classroom as an ethnic project 日本の補習言語教育と市民権 民族的課題としての第二言語教室. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 11(32), 1-18.Google Scholar
  47. National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Public high school graduation rates. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_coi.asp
  48. Oakes, J. (1987). Tracking in secondary schools: A contextual perspective. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I): Student performance in mathematics, reading and science, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-I.pdf
  50. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1998). The educational system in Japan: Case study findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  51. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1999a). The educational system in the U.S.: Case study findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  52. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1999b). The educational system in Germany: Case study findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  53. Okano, K. H. (2004). Koreans in Japan: A minority’s changing relationship with schools. International Review of Education, 50(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Okano, K. (2013). Ethnic schools and multiculturalism in Japan. In G. DeCoker & C. Bjork (Eds.), Japanese education in an era of globalization: Culture, politics, and equity (pp. 85–100). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  55. Omura, M. (2011). Economic impacts of surge in immigration in Japan from 2000–2009-Bonus or onus? (No. 19). New ESRI Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/new_wp/new_wp020/new_wp019.pdf
  56. Ono, H. (2001). Who goes to college? Features of institutional tracking in Japanese higher education. American Journal of Education, 109(2), 161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parmenter, L. (2000). Globalization in Japan: Education policy and curriculum. In N. Stromquist & K. Monkman (Eds.), Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures (pp. 201–216). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  58. Pew Research Center. (2015). Educational attainment by Latino origin group, 2013. The impact of slowing immigration: Foreign-born share falls among 14 largest U.S. Hispanic origin groups. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/09/15/the-impact-of-slowing-immigration-foreign-born-share-falls-among-14-largest-us-hispanic-origin-groups/ph_2015-09-15_hispanic-origins-07/
  59. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, G. R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Portes, P. R., & Salas, S. (2015). Nativity shifts, broken dreams, and the new Latino south’s post-first generation. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(3), 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riordan, B. (2014). Language policy for linguistic minority students in Japanese public schools and prospects for bilingualism: THE Nikkei Brazilian case. IULC Working Papers, 5(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  62. Rios-Aguilar, C., & Deil-Amen, R. (2012). Beyond getting in and fitting in: An examination of social networks and professionally relevant social capital among Latina/o university students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rohlen, T. (1980). The Juku phenomenon: An exploratory essay. Journal of Japanese Studies, 6(2), 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., & Schoenbach, C. (1989). Self-esteem and adolescent problems: Modeling reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review, 54, 1004–1018. doi: 10.2307/2095720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roth, B. J. (2014). Making connections in middle-class suburbs? Low-income Mexican immigrant young men, social capital, and pathways to high school graduation. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 13(4), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruiz, M., Luis-Vicente, R., Trujillo, M., Chavez, E., Antunez, N., Lugo, V., et al. (2011). La batalla continua: Latina/o educators democratizing educational practices. Critical Education, 2(12), 1–19.Google Scholar
  67. Salas, S., Portes, P. R., D’Amico, M. M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2011). Generación 1.5: A cultural historical agenda for research at the 2-year college. Community College Review, 39(2), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Cummins, J. (1988). Minority education: From shame to struggle. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  69. Sorenson, A. B. (1970). The organizational differentiation of students in schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  70. Spellings, M. (2014). 10 facts about K-12 education funding. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/10facts/index.html?exp
  71. Statistics Bureau. (2014). Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications website. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/1431-02.htm
  72. Stedman, L. C. (2010). How well does the standards movement measure up? An analysis of achievement trends and student learning, changes in curriculum and school culture, and the impact of No Child Left Behind. Critical Education, 1(10). Retrieved from http://m1.cust.educ.ubc.ca/journal/index.php/criticaled/issue/view133
  73. Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  74. Takenaka, A., Nakamuro, M., & Ishida, K. (2015). Negative assimilation: How immigrants experience economic mobility in Japan. International Migration Review, 50(2), 506–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tsuneyoshi, R., Okano, K. H., & Boocock, S. (Eds.). (2010). Minorities and education in multicultural Japan: An interactive perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Tyler, R. W. (1971). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  78. Ushomirsky, N., & Williams, D. (2015). Funding gaps 2015: Too many states still spend less on educating students who need the most. The Education Trust. Retrieved from http://edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/FundingGaps2015_TheEducationTrust1.pdf
  79. Valenzuela, A. (2010). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  80. Vanfossen, B. E., Jones, J. D., & Spade, J. Z. (1987). Curriculum tracking and status maintenance. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. VanHoutte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). Study involvement of academic and vocational students: Does between-school tracking sharpen the difference? American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 943–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weiner, M. (1994). Japan in the age of migration. In M. Douglas & G. S. Roberts (Eds.), Japan and global migration: Foreign workers and the advent of a multicultural society (pp. 52–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Wiggan, G. (2011). Education in a strange land: Globalization, urbanization, and urban schools: The social and educational implications of the geopolitical economy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  84. Yamashiro, J. H. (2013). The social construction of race and minorities in Japan. Sociology Compass, 7(2), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yosso, T. J., & Solorzano, D. G. (2006). Leaks in the Chicana and Chicano education pipeline. Latino Policy and Issues Brief. Number 13.Google Scholar
  86. Zambrana, R. E., & Hurtado, S. (2016). Mexican Americans’ educational barriers and progress: Is the magic key within reach? PERSPECTIVAS: Issues in Higher Education Policy and Practice, No. 5.Google Scholar
  87. Zhou, M., Lee, J., Agius-Vallegjo, J., Tafoya-Estrada, R., & Xiong, Y. (2008). Success attained, deterred, and denied: Divergent pathways to social mobility in Los Angeles’s new second generation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 620(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNCC College of EducationUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options