Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 746–776 | Cite as

Getting from Here to There: The Role of Geography in Community College Students’ Transfer Decisions

  • Huriya Jabbar
  • Joanna Sánchez
  • Eliza Epstein
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Community colleges have received renewed attention from policymakers seeking to increase college attendance and completion rates because they provide open access to postsecondary education for historically marginalized students. Yet, transfer rates from community colleges to 4-year institutions are low. Inequities in opportunity that are shaped by geography and compounded throughout childhood may restrict higher education opportunities for low-income, first-generation college students. Most studies examining how geography constrains college choice focus on high school students’ initial decisions about higher education, not community college students. We analyze the spatial distribution of community college students’ “choice sets,” the 4-year institutions that they are considering transferring to. Using qualitative interviews and geospatial analysis, we examine how these spatial patterns compare between two community-college systems in Central Texas. We find that students’ choice sets are geographically constrained, but that for many students, these zones are geographically large, suggesting that interventions and targeted outreach from universities could help students identify and select from greater range of options. Our findings have important implications for college access and completion among first-generation college students, and for policies that seek to interrupt patterns of inequity tied to location.

Keywords

Community colleges Transfer Choice Equity Geography of opportunity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alvarado, C. (2015). GTF policy brief: Transfer for student success. Retrieved from http://www.greatertexasfoundation.org/gtf-policy-brief-transfer-for-student-success/.
  2. Angrist, J., Hudson, S., & Pallais, A. (2014). Leveling up: Early results from a randomized evaluation of post-secondary aid (No. w20800). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. C., & Geiser, S. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Backes, B., & Velez, E. D. (2015). Who transfers and where do they go? Community college students in Florida. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER).  Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J., Davies, J., David, M., & Reay, D. (2002). “Classification” and “Judgement”: Social class and the “cognitive structures” of choice of Higher Education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 51–72. doi: 10.1080/01425690120102854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beattie, I. R. (2002). Are all adolescent econometricians” created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 75, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, C. A. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208. doi: 10.1080/01619560902810146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bensimon, E. M., & Dowd, A. (2009). Dimensions of the transfer choice gap: Experiences of Latina and Latino students who navigated transfer pathways. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 632–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bers, T. H., & Galowich, P. M. (2002). Using survey and focus group research to learn about parents’ roles in the community college choice process. Community College Review, 29(4), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bettinger, E. P., Long, B. T., Oreopoulos, P., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2009). The role of simplification and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15361.
  12. Black, S. E., Cortes, K. E., & Lincove, J. A. (2015). Apply yourself: Racial and ethnic differences in college application. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21368.
  13. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2013). Online learning in higher education: Randomized trial compares hybrid learning to traditional course. Education Next, 13(2), 58–65.Google Scholar
  14. Briscoe, F. M., & De Oliver, M. (2006). Access to higher education: A conflict between landed interests and democratic ideals. Education and Urban Society, 38(2), 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buendía, E., & Ares, N. (2006). Geographies of difference: The social production of the east side, west side and central city school (Vol. 17). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Buendía, E., Ares, N., Juarez, B. G., & Peercy, M. (2004). The geographies of difference: The production of the east side, west side, and central city school. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 833–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castleman, B. L., Schwartz, S., & Baum, S. (2015). Decision making for student success: Behavioral insights to improve college access and persistence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Castro, E. L., & Cortez, E. (2017). Exploring the lived experiences and intersectionalities of Mexican community college transfer students: Qualitative insights toward expanding a transfer receptive culture. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(2), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., & Turner, N. (2014). Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. The American Economic Review, 104(5), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooke, T. J., & Boyle, P. (2011). The migration of high school graduates to college. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Crisp, G., & Delgado, C. (2014). The impact of developmental education on community college persistence and vertical transfer. Community College Review, 42(2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crisp, G., & Nuñez, A.-M. (2014). Understanding the racial transfer gap: Modeling underrepresented minority and nonminority students’ pathways from two-to four-year institutions. The Review of Higher Education, 37(3), 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cuseo, J. B. (1998). The transfer transition: A summary of key issues, target areas and tactics for reform. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED425771.
  25. De Oliver, M. (1998). Geography, race, and class: A case study of the role of geography at an urban public university. American Journal of Education, 106, 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Sousa Briggs, X. (Ed.). (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  27. DesJardins, S. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, XX (pp. 191–240). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doyle, W. R. (2009). The effect of community college enrollment on bachelor’s degree completion. Economics of Education Review, 28(2), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doyle, W. R. (2010). Open-access colleges responsible for greatest gains in graduation rates. Policy Alert: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  30. Dynarski, S. M., & Scott-Clayton, J. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12227.
  31. Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Ramirez, J. J., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Hurtado, S. (2014). The American freshman: National norms fall 2014. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  32. Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. (2010). The nature of schooling (p. 178). The Structure of Schooling: Readings in the Sociology of Education.Google Scholar
  33. Fishman, R. (2015). College decisions survey: Part I, deciding to go to college. Washington, DC: New America. http://www.Edcentral.Org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2015/05/FINAL-College-Decisions-Survey-528.Pdf.
  34. Flint, T. A. (1992). Parental and planning influences on the formation of student college choice sets. Research in Higher Education, 33(6), 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fryar, A. H. (2014). The Comprehensive University. In The University Next Door: What Is a Comprehensive University, Who Does It Educate, and Can It Survive? (p. 19).Google Scholar
  36. Gándara, P., & Moreno, J. F. (2002). Introduction: The Puente project—Issues and perspectives on preparing Latino youth for higher education. Educational Policy, 16(4), 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gonzalez, A., & Hilmer, M. J. (2006). The role of 2-year colleges in the improving situation of Hispanic postsecondary education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Green, T. L. (2015). Places of inequality, places of possibility: Mapping “opportunity in geography” across urban school-communities. The Urban Review, 47(4), 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grodsky, E., & Jones, M. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Social Science Research, 36(2), 745–766. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grubb, W. N. (1991). The decline of community college transfer rates: Evidence from national longitudinal surveys. The Journal of Higher Education, 62(2), 194–222. doi: 10.2307/1982145.Google Scholar
  41. Grubb, W. N., Lara, C. M., & Valdez, S. (2002). Counselor, coordinator, monitor, mom: The roles of counselors in the Puente program. Educational Policy, 16(4), 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gulson, K. N. (2007). ‘Neoliberal spatial technologies’: On the practices of educational policy change. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hagedorn, L. S., Chi, W. Y., Cepeda, R. M., & McLain, M. (2007). An investigation of critical mass: The role of Latino representation in the success of urban community college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Helfenbein, R. J., & Taylor, L. H. (2009). Critical geographies in/of education: Introduction. Educational Studies, 45(3), 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hillman, N., & Weichman, T. (2016). Education deserts: The continued significance of “place” in the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:73607.
  46. Hilmer, M. J. (1997). Does community college attendance provide a strategic path to a higher quality education? Economics of Education Review, 16(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Horn, L., & Skomsvold, P. (2011). Community college student outcomes: 1994–2009. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  48. Hoxby, C. M., & Avery, C. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18586.
  49. Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70, 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hurwitz, M., Smith, J., Howell, J., & Pender, M. (2012). The role of high schools in students’ postsecondary choices. Advocacy and Policy Center Research Brief. New York, NY: The College Board.Google Scholar
  51. Jabbar, H. (2011). The behavioral economics of education. Educational Researcher, 40(9), 446–453. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11426351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jabbar, H., Serrata, C., Epstein, E., & Sanchez, J. (2017). “Échale ganas”: Family and community support of Latino/a community college students’ transfer to four-year universities. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  53. Jenkins, D., & Fink, J. (2016). Tracking transfer: New measures of institutional and state effectiveness in helping community college students attain bachelor’s degrees. Community College Research Center, Teachers College. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  54. Jepsen, C., & Montgomery, M. (2009). Miles to go before I learn: The effect of travel distance on the mature person’s choice of a community college. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jocson, K., & Thorne-Wallington, E. (2013). Mapping literacy-rich environments: Geospatial perspectives on literacy and education. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–24.Google Scholar
  56. Kohn, M. G., Mansk, C. F., & Mundel, D. S. (1976). An empirical investigation of factors which influence college-going behavior. In Annals of economic and social measurement (Vol. 5, no 4, pp. 391–419). NBER. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12702.pdf.
  57. Kwan, M. P., & Ding, G. (2008). Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer, 60(4), 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leigh, D. E., & Gill, A. M. (2003). Do community colleges really divert students from earning bachelor’s degrees? Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 23–30. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00057-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lipman, P. (2007). Education and the spatialization of urban inequality: A case study of Chicago’s Renaissance 2010. In K. Gulson, & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters (pp. 155–174). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Lockwood-Reynolds, C. (2012). Where to attend? Estimating the effects of beginning college at a two-year institution. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Logan, J. R., Minca, E., & Adar, S. (2012). The geography of inequality why separate means unequal in American public schools. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Long, B. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1), 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Long, B. T. (2007). The contributions of economics to the study of college access and success. Teachers College Record, 109(10), 2367–2443.Google Scholar
  64. Long, B. T., & Kurlaender, M. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a baccalaureate degree? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ma, J., & Baum, S. (2016). Trends in community colleges: Enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion. New York, NY: College Board.Google Scholar
  67. Manski, C. F. (1993). Adolescent econometricians: How do youth infer the returns to schooling? In Studies of supply and demand in higher education (pp. 43–60). University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c6097.pdf.
  68. Martinez, M. A. (2013). (Re) considering the role familismo plays in Latina/o high school students’ college choices. The High School Journal, 97(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Miller, P. (2012). Mapping educational opportunity zones: A geospatial analysis of neighborhood block groups. Urban Review, 44(2), 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Núñez, A.-M., & Oliva, M. (2009). Organizational collaboration to promote college access: A P-20 framework. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(4), 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Page, L. C., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Phillippo, K. L., & Griffin, B. (2016). The social geography of choice: Neighborhoods’ role in students’ navigation of school choice policy in Chicago. The Urban Review, 48(5), 668–695. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0373-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rusk, D. (2003). Cities without suburbs (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  75. Russick, B., & Olson, P. (1976). How high school seniors choose a college. In Choice or chance. Planning for independent college marketing and retention (pp. 65–76). Northwest Area Foundation. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED135289.
  76. Sáenz, V. (2004). Resources and information for serving minority populations. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2004(127), 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schudde, L. T. (2011). The causal effect of campus residency on college student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 34(4), 581–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schudde, L., & Goldrick-Rab, S. (2014). On second chances and stratification: How sociologists think about community colleges. Community College Review, 43(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1177/0091552114553296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shaw, K. M., & London, H. B. (2001). Culture and ideology in keeping transfer commitment: Three community colleges. The Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, J., Pender, M., & Howell, J. (2013). The full extent of student-college academic undermatch. Economics of Education Review, 32, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Expanding the geographical imagination. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Somers, P., Haines, K., Keene, B., Bauer, J., Pfeiffer, M., McCluskey, J., et al. (2006). Towards a theory of choice for community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Surette, B. J. (2001). Transfer from two-year to four-year college: An analysis of gender differences. Economics of Education Review, 20(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sutton, S. E., & Kemp, S. P. (Eds.). (2011). The paradox of urban space: inequality and transformation in marginalized communities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  85. Tate, W. F. (2008). “Geography of opportunity”: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tierney, M. L. (1983). Student college choice sets: Toward an empirical characterization. Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turley, R. N. L. (2006). When parents want children to stay home for college. Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Turley, R. N. L. (2009). College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 126–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vergolini, L., & Zanini, N. (2015). Away, but not too far from home: The effects of financial aid on university enrollment decisions. Economics of Education Review, 49, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wassmer, R., Moore, C., & Shulock, N. (2004). Effect of racial/ethnic composition on transfer rates in community colleges: Implications for policy and practice. Research in Higher Education, 45(6), 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yoon, E. S., & Lubienski, C. (2017). How do marginalized families engage school choice in inequitable urban landscapes? A critical geographic approach. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 42. doi: 10.14507/epaa.25.2655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yosso, T. J., Parker, L., Solorzano, D. G., & Lynn, M. (2004). From Jim Crow to affirmative action and back again: A critical race discussion of racialized rationales and access to higher education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Policy and Planning, Department of Educational AdministrationThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options