Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 372–381 | Cite as

Long-Lasting Fieldwork, Ethnographic Restitution and ‘Engaged Anthropology’ in Romani Studies

  • Federica Setti
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The history of relationships between Roma/Sinti and non-Roma/non-Sinti is marked and crossed by negative features and trails: anti-ziganismus, asymmetric power relationships within institutions and the absence of social justice in the school toward Romani minorities. This article—starting from the negative aspects of the inter-ethnic relations between Roma and majority societies—on the contrary explores the positive features of these relationships, through a long-lasting ethnographic research and through the intimacy and friendship of the author with the research’ subjects. Without the deep connection and friendship established through the ethnographic relationship, these “positive” outcome would have remained eluded. The article will highlight how long-lasting ethnographic research is essential for the research’ outcomes, but also for the improvement of social justice within institutions, impairing the asymmetric power relationships between non-Roma majority and Roma/Sinti minorities. Indeed, long-lasting ethnographic research, ethnographic restitution and an “engaged anthropology” approach are central issues for intercultural education both within institutions, such as school, and in less formal contexts, as urban quarters, low-income flats and extra-school contexts of multicultural societies.

Keywords

Anthropology and education Romani studies Inter-ethnic relations Intercultural education Engaged anthropology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Avery, H., & Hoxhallari, I. (2017). From policy to practice: Roma education in Albania and Sweden. Urban Review. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0394-5.
  2. Bancroft, A. (1999). ‘Gypsies to the camps!’ Exclusion and marginalisation of Roma in the Czech Republic. Sociological Research on Line, 4(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1992). Soil, blood and identity. The Sociological Review, 40(4), 675–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La Reproduction: Eléments pour une Théorie du Système d’Enseignement [Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture]. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  5. Brunello, P. (1996). L’Urbanistica del Disprezzo. Campi Rom e Società Italiana [The city planning’s disdain. Roma Camps and Italian Society]. Roma: Manifestolibri.Google Scholar
  6. European Roma Rights Center. (2000). Il Paese dei Campi. La Segregazione Razziale dei Rom in Italia [The country of the camps. The racial segregation of the Roma in Italy]. Roma: Carta.Google Scholar
  7. Gobbo, F. (2004). Cultural intersections: The life history of a cultural mediator. European Educational Research Journal, 3(3), 626–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gobbo, F. (2011). Racism, ‘race’ and ethnographic research in multicultural Italy. Ethnography and Education, 6(1), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gobbo, F. (2017). Educational justice and occupational mobility: The role of civic commitment and of imagination. Urban Review. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0392-7.
  10. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Gomes, A. M. (1998). Etnografia della Scolarizzazione in una Comunità di Sinti [Ethnography of schooling in a Sinti community]. Roma: Cisu.Google Scholar
  12. Goodenough, W. H. (1981). Culture, language and society. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  13. Herzfeld, M. (2012). Passionate serendipity: From the Acropolis to the Golden Mount. In A. Gottlieb (Ed.), The restless anthropologist: New fieldsites, new visions (pp. 100–122). London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Illuzzi, J. (2006). I ‘Bastardi dell’Umanità’: Categorization of Zingari, 1861–1914. Paper presented at the graduate workshop in modern history. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/manu0014/gwmh/Illuzzi_GWMH_Paper.doc. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.
  15. Levínská, M., & Doubek, D. (2017). Alice: Overcoming the Border Motto: “I Am No Longer Afraid of the World”. Urban Review. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0395-4.
  16. Levinson, M. (2017). When participants don’t wish to participate in participatory action research, and when others participate on their behalf: The representation of communities by real and faux participants. Urban Review. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0390-9.
  17. Moree, D., Vávrová, T., & Felcmanová, A. (2017). Blue or red? Why do categories attract? Urban Review. doi: 10.1007/s11256-016-0396-3.
  18. Peano, G. (2011). Attraversare Confini: il Percorso Scolastico dei Bambini Rom tra Campo e Scuola. Una Ricerca Etnografica. [Crossing borders: Roma children’ school pathways between camp and school. An ethnographic research]. PhD diss., University of Turin.Google Scholar
  19. Piasere, L. (2004). I Rom d’Europa. Una Storia Moderna [Roma of Europe. A modern history]. Bari: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
  20. Saletti Salza, C. (2003). Bambini del Campo Nomadi. Romá Bosniaci a Torino [Children from the ‘nomads’ campsite’. Bosnian Roma’ in Turin]. Roma: CISU.Google Scholar
  21. Saletti Salza, C. (2008). Alunni rom e sinti, Soggetti di un Percorso Speciale, Differenziante [Roma and Sinti pupils, subjects of a special, discriminant path]. In F. Gobbo (Ed.), L’educazione al Tempo dell’Intercultura [Education in the time of interculture] (pp. 109–128). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  22. Setti, F. (2010). I Nostri Adulti sono Rom, i Vostri Gagé. I Bambini Sono Tutti Uguali. Etnografia della Scolarizzazione e Propriospettive tra Bambini Dassikané Roma a Torino [Our Adults are Roma, Yours are Gagé. The Children are All the Same. Ethnography of schooling and propriospects among Dassikané Roma children in Turin].” MA diss., University of Turin.Google Scholar
  23. Setti, F. (2014). Imparare attraverso la relazione e apprendere “per gaffe”. Riflessioni sull’etnografia a partire da una ricerca sul campo tra sinti e non sinti a Trento [Learning through relationships and comprehending through “Gaffes”. Reflections on ethnography inspired by a field research among Sinti and Non Sinti in Trento]. In F. Gobbo, & A., Simonicca (Eds.), Etnografia e Intercultura [Ethnography and Interculture] (pp. 123–149). Roma: CISU.Google Scholar
  24. Setti, F. (2015). Una questione di prospettive. Etnografia dell’educazione e delle relazioni tra sinti e non sinti [In a matter of perspectives. Ethnography of education and of the relation between Sinti and non-Sinti]. Roma: CISU.Google Scholar
  25. Sigona, N. (2003). How can ‘nomad’ be a ‘refugee’? Sociology, 37(1), 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sigona, N. (2011). The Governance of Romani people in Italy: Discourse, policy and practice. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 16(5), 590–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soravia, G. (1977). Dialetti degli “Zingari” Italiani [Dialects of Italian ‘gypsies’]. Pisa: Pacini Editore.Google Scholar
  28. Spinelli, S. (2012). Rom, Genti Libere [Roma, free people]. Milano: Dalai Editore.Google Scholar
  29. Sway, M. (1981). Simmel’s concept of the stranger and the gypsies. Social Science Journal, 18(1), 41–50.Google Scholar
  30. Tauber, E. (2006). Du Wirst Keine Ehemann Nehmen. Respekt, Bedeutung der Toten und Fluchtheirat bei den Sinti Estraixaria [You will not take husband. respect, meaning of death and wedding among Estraixaria Sinti]. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Wolcott, H. (2004). A Scuola in un Villaggio Kwakiutl [A Kwakiutl village and school]. Padova: Imprimitur.Google Scholar

Documents

  1. Cooperativa Kaleidoscopio. (2011). Domanda di Contributo per il Finanziamento di Progetti Relativi alle Nuove Povertà e all’Esclusione Sociale [Application for funding projects about the new poverties and social exclusion].Google Scholar
  2. Fondazione Michelucci, Provincia Autonoma di Trento and Cooperativa Kaleidoscopio. (2005). Linee Guida per un Programma di Superamento delle Situazioni di Disagio Abitativo tra le Popolazioni Sinti della Provincia di Trento [Guidelines for a program to overcome situations of housing unease among Sinti people in trent local authority].Google Scholar
  3. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Dipartimento Istruzione Università e Ricerca. (2012). Inserimento e Integrazione degli Studenti Stranieri. Linee Guida per le Istituzioni Scolastiche e Formative della Provincia di Trento [Inclusion and integration of foreign students. Guidelines for school institutions in trent local authority]. http://www.iclevico.eu/documenti/STUDENTI%20STRANIERI/linee%20guida%202012%20su%20stud.%20stranieri.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options