Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 140–152 | Cite as

Millennials, Technology and Perceived Relevance of Community Service Organizations: Is Social Media Replacing Community Service Activities?

  • August John Hoffman
Article

Abstract

This mixed-methods qualitative study examined the relationship between perceptions of the importance of social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter) with community service projects and volunteerism. Participants (n = 80) were interviewed and surveyed regarding their experiences in participating in a variety of community service work (CSW) projects (i.e., urban forestry, community gardening) with their perceptions of the importance of social media. Results supported the hypothesis that a significant correlation exists (r = .286, p < .05) between perceptions of technology as an important part of my life and reduced importance of CSW activities. A significant correlation (r = 287, p < .001) also developed between perceptions of “connectedness” to one’s community, increased technology use and reduced perceptions of the importance of CSW activities. Additionally, a significant positive correlation (r = .454, p < .001) was found between reports of improved perceptions among ethnically diverse populations and the overall importance of CSW activities within the community. Results and suggestions for further research are offered regarding the application of theory to “real world” perspectives and problems involving education and environmental issues.

Keywords

Social media, Community service work Prosocial attitudes Self-entitlement Millennial generation Global generation “Connectedness” with community 

References

  1. Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 887–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastos, M. T. (2014). Shares, pins and tweets: News readership from daily papers to social media. Journalism Studies. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.891857.Google Scholar
  3. Batt-Rawden, S., Flickenger, T., Weiner, J., Cheston, C., & Chisolm, M. (2014). The role of social media in clinical excellence. Clinical Teacher, 11(4), 264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blease, C. R. (2015). Too many ‘friends’, too few ‘likes’? Evolutionary psychology and Facebook depression. Review of General Psychology, 19(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, J., & Henry, L. (2011). A model for building school-family-community partnerships: Principles and process. Journal of Counseling and Development, 90, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, S., Chong, S., Ewen, V., Toombs, E., Tazlazidis, R., & Maranzan, K. A. (2016). Social media policy for graduate students: Challenges and opportunities for professional psychology training programs. Canadian Psychology, 57(3), 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caruso, J. B. & Salaway, G. (2007). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. http://www.csplacement.com/downloads/ECAR-ITSkliisstudy.pdf.
  8. Featured Insights, Global, Media+Entertainment. Nielsen. Retrieved December 9, 2012 State of the media: The social media report 2012 (http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/2012).
  9. Hoffman, A. J., Wallach, J. N., & Sanchez, E. (2010). Rediscovering community: Interethnic relationships and community gardening. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=321895. Keyboard Confessional: Clicking Your Way to Forgiveness.
  11. Jackson, M. (2005). From work-family balance to work-family interaction: Changing the metaphor. In D. Halpern & S. Elaine (Eds.), The limits of connectivity: Technology and twenty first-century life (pp. 135–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, M. K., Christenson, A., Snibbe, J. R., Dolezal-Wood, S., Huber, A., & Jacobs, M. K. (2001). A comparison of computer-based versus traditional individual psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jalali, A., Sherbino, J., Frank, J., & Sutherland, S. (2015). Social media and medical education: Exploring the potential of Twitter as a learning tool. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(2), 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jalali, A., & Wood, T. J. (2013). Tweeting during conferences: Education or just another distraction? Medical Education, 47, 1119–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly, J. (1971). Qualities for the community psychologist. American Psychologist, 25, 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mihailidis, P. (2014). The civic-social media disconnect: Exploring perceptions of social media for engagement in the daily life of college students. Information Communication and Society, 17(9), 1059–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers, S. B., Endres, M. A., Ruddy, M. E., & Zelikovsky, N. (2012). Psychology graduate training in the era of online social networking. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6, 28–38l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nitzan, U., Shoshan, E., Lev-Ran, S., & Fennig, S. (2013). Internet—Related psychosis—A sign of the times? The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 48, 207–211.Google Scholar
  20. O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127, 800–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pham, A. (2014). Navigating social networking and social media in school psychology: Ethical and professional considerations in training programs. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 767–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Shuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers, E. M. (1987). Progress, problems and prospects for network research: Investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies. Social Networks, 9, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Perspectives for community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Random House Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  26. Tidball, K. G., Krasny, M. E., Svendsen, E., Campbell, L., & Helphand, K. (2010). Stewardship, learning, and memory in disaster resilience. Environmental Education Research, 16, 591–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tu, C., Dilley, A. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Do we create what we watch? Creativity and entertainment preferences. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 9, 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Freeman, E. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adult’s life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1045–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media, 3(4), 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wakefield, J. (2014). Facebook turns 10 but are its days numbered? BBC News. Retrieved 10 February 10, 2014 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25953225.
  31. Wolff, T. (2010). The power of collaborative solutions: Six principles and effective tools for building healthy communities. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Wolff, T. (2013). A community psychologist’s involvement in policy change at the community level: Three stories from a practitioner. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 4(2), 2–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMetropolitan State UniversitySt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations