Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 766–798 | Cite as

Teaching the Whole Child: The Importance of Culturally Responsiveness, Community Engagement, and Character Development in High Achieving African American Students

  • Greg Wiggan
  • Marcia J. Watson
Article

Abstract

Current research on African American education is saturated with studies on school failure (Collins 2003; Glasser 1969; Irvine 1990; Kozol 2005; MacLeod 1995; Neckerman 2007; Walker and Sprague 1999), rather than investigations that address the processes that mediate failure and create success (Bell 2001; Chenoweth 2007, 2009; Evans-Winters 2011; Hopkins 1997; King 2005; Perry et al. 2003; Wiggan 2008, 2014). Most of the existing research provides extensive critiques without exploring successful strategies that promote high-achievement among underserved student populations. Using a qualitative case study design, this research explores the perceptions and experiences of students and teachers at a high performing minority school. The findings reveal that the use of multicultural curriculum and anti-racism education had a positive impact on the social, cultural, and academic achievement of the students. The results of this study are particularly important given the existing research on African Americans and the critical needs in educational reform.

Keywords

Culturally responsive teaching Transformative learning Anti-racist pedagogy Urban education High performing schools Educational reform 

References

  1. Achilles, C. (1999). Let’s put kids first, finally: Getting class size right. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akbar, N. (1998). Know thy self. Tallahassee: Mind Productions and Associates.Google Scholar
  3. American Library Association. (2016). Most frequently challenged books written by authors of color 1990–1999. American Library Association: Banned & Challenged Books. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/challengedauthors/ authorsofcolor
  4. Ancess, J. (2003). Beating the odds: High schools as communities of commitment. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Archer-Banks, D. A. M., & Behar-Horenstein, L. S. (2012). Ogbu revisited: Unpacking high-achieving African American girls’ high school experiences. Urban Education, 47(1), 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asante, M. K. (1991). The afrocentric idea in education. The Journal of Negro Education, 60(2), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asante, M. K. (2003). Afrocentricity: The theory of social change. Chicago, IL: African American Images.Google Scholar
  9. Asante, M. K. (2009a). The Asante principles for the afrocentric curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.asante.net/articles/6/the-asante-principles-for-the-afrocentric-curriculum
  10. Asante, M. K. (2009b). Afrocentricity: Toward a new understanding of African thought in the world. Retrieved from http://www.asante.net/articles/5/afrocentricity-toward-a-new-understanding-of-african-thought-in-the-world
  11. Asante, M. K. (2010). Afrocentricity and africology: Theory and practice in the discipline. In J. R. Davidson (Ed.), African American studies (pp. 35–52). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bates, J. T. (1993). Portrait of a successful rural alternative school. Rural Educator, 14(3), 20–24.Google Scholar
  13. Bell, J. A. (2001). High-performing, high-poverty schools. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 31(1), 8–11.Google Scholar
  14. Bloom, C. M., & Owens, E. W. (2013). Principals’ perception of influence on factors affecting student achievement in low- and high-achieving urban high schools. Education and Urban Society, 45(2), 208–233. doi: 10.1177/0013124511406916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cabrera, K. E. (2010). Sustaining success toward closing the achievement gap: A case study of one urban high school. (Order No. 3403531, University of Southern California). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses,, 200-n/a. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/365513109?accountid=14605. (365513109).
  16. Case, K. I. (1997). African American othermothering in the urban elementary school. The Urban Review, 29(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chenoweth, K. (2007). It’s being done. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chenoweth, K. (2009). How it’s being done. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  19. Colby, S. L. & Ortman, J. M. (2014). Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014–2060, current population reports, P25-1143. US Census Bureau. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Cole-Henderson, B. (2000). Organizational characteristics of schools that successfully serve low-income urban African American students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1), 77–91. doi: 10.1080/10824669.2000.9671381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collins, K. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child’s struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates Press.Google Scholar
  22. Comer, J. P. (1996). Rallying the whole village: The Comer process for reforming education. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Council for American Private Education. (2016). Facts and studies. Council for American Private Education: Voice of America’s Private Schools. Retrieved from http://www.capenet.org/facts.html
  24. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dee, T. S. (2003). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dei, G. J. (2003). Communication across the tracks: Challenges for anti-racist educators in Ontario today. Orbit, 33(3), 2–5.Google Scholar
  28. Dei, G. J. (1996). The role of afrocentricity in the inclusive curriculum in Canadian schools. Canadian Journal of Education, 21(2), 170–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dei, G. J. S. (2012). Teaching Africa: Towards a transgressive pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. deMarrais, K. B., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). The way schools work. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Dillihunt, M. L., & Tyler, K. M. (2006). Examining the effects of multiple intelligence instruction on math performance. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 2, 131–150.Google Scholar
  32. Egalite, A. J., Kisida, B., & Winters, M. A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teacher assignment on student achievement. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  33. Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Elias, M. J., & Haynes, N. M. (2008). Social competence, social support, and academic achievement in minority, low-income, urban elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 474–495. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Evans-Winters, V. E. (2011). Teaching black girls: Resiliency in urban classrooms. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Ferber, A. L. (2012). The culture of privilege: Color-blindness, postfeminism, and christonormativity. The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 68(1), 63–77.Google Scholar
  37. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  38. French, D. (2003). Creating schools that work: Lessons for reform from successful urban high schools. Center for Collaborative Education Boston, MA: Jobs For The Future.Google Scholar
  39. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gay, G. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(6), 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gay, G. (2015). The what, why, and how of culturally responsive teaching: International mandates, challenges, and opportunities. Multicultural Education Review, 7(3), 123–139.Google Scholar
  43. Georgia Department of Education. (2015). Atlanta Public Schools free and reduced lunch: Fiscal year 2016 data report. Atlanta Public Schools. Retrieved from https://app3.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_frl001_public.entry_form
  44. Geresma, E. (2012). Tucson schools suspend ethnic studies program. The Arizona Republic News. Google Scholar
  45. Glasser, W. (1969). Schools without failure. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  46. Glense, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  47. Gramsci, A. (1999). Selections from the prison notebooks. London, UK: The Electric Book Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  48. Green, P. (2011). African Americans in urban Catholic schools: Faith, leadership and persistence in pursuit of educational opportunity. The Urban Review, 43(3), 436–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haberman, M. (2000). The anti-learning curriculum of urban schools, part 2: The solution. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 35(2), 71–74. doi: 10.1080/00228958.1999.10518420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harrell-Levy, M. K., Kerpelman, J. L., & Henry, D. J. (2016). Practices of exemplary transformative teachers, as perceived by students transformed by an urban high school social justice course. The Urban Review, 48(1), 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Henig, J. R., Hula, R. C., Orr, M., & Pedeseleaux, D. S. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hopkins, R. (1997). Educating black males: Critical lessons in schooling community, and power. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ighodaro, E., & Wiggan, G. (2011). Curriculum violence: America’s new civil rights issue. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Irvine, J. J. (1990). Black students and school failure: Policies, practices, and prescriptions. New York: Preager.Google Scholar
  55. Jackson, C. (1994). The feasibility of an Afrocentric curriculum. Southern Social Studies Journal, 20(1), 60–74.Google Scholar
  56. Jeynes, W. H. (2007). Religion, intact families, and the achievement gap. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 3(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
  57. Joyce, J. A. (2005). Black studies as human studies: Critical essays and interviews. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  58. Karenga, M. (2002). Introduction to black studies. Los Angeles, CA: University of Sankore Press.Google Scholar
  59. Khalifa, M. (2012). A “re”-new-”ed” paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 424–467. doi: 10.1177/0013161X11432922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. King, J. E. (2005). Black education: A transformative research and action agenda for the new century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  61. King, J. E., Swartz, E. E., Campbell, L., Lemons-Smith, S., & López, E. (2014). Re-membering history in student and teacher learning: An afrocentric culturally informed praxis. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: Apartheid schooling in America. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  63. Kunjufu, J. (2002). Black students middle class teachers. Chicago, IL: African American Images.Google Scholar
  64. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  65. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006a). It’s not the culture of poverty, it’s the poverty of culture: The problem with teacher education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 37(2), 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006b). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lemert, C. (2004). Social theory: The multicultural and classic readings (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  68. Lenski, S. D., Crawford, K., Crumpler, T., & Stallworth, C. (2005). Preparing pre-service teachers in a diverse world. Action in Teacher Education, 27(3), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Loewen, J. W. (1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  70. Love, D. (2016). “Stanford study: ‘Culturally relevant’ teaching boosts GPA, attendance for at-risk youth, so why not make it universal?” Atlanta Blackstar. Retrieved from http://atlantablackstar.com/2016/01/26/stanford-study-culturally-relevant-teaching-boosts-gpa-attendance-for-at-risk-youth-so-why-not-make-it-universal/.
  71. MacLeod, J. (1995). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  72. Martin, M., Fergus, E., & Noguera, P. (2010). Responding to the needs of the whole child: A case study of a high-performing elementary school for immigrant children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26(3), 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Matias, C. E., & Mackey, J. (2016). Breakin’ down whiteness in antiracist teaching: Introducing critical whiteness pedagogy. The Urban Review, 48(1), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Maxwell, L. A. (2014). US enrollment hits majority-minority milestone. Education Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/08/20/01demographics.h34.html
  75. McGrady, P. B., & Reynolds, J. R. (2013). Racial mismatch in the classroom: Beyond black-white differences. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Milner, H. R., & Hoy, A. N. (2003). A case study of an African American teacher’s self-efficacy, stereotype threat, and persistence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Murrell, P. C. (2002). African-centered pedagogy: Developing schools of achievement for African American children. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  78. National Assessment of Education Progress. (2013a). Trend in fourth-grade NAEP mathematics achievement-level results, by type of school. What proportions of student groups are reaching proficient? The Nation’s Report Card. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013/#/student-groups
  79. National Assessment of Education Progress. (2013b). Trend in eighth-grade NAEP mathematics achievement-level results, by type of school. What proportions of student groups are reaching proficient? The Nation’s Report Card. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013/#/student-groups
  80. National Assessment of Education Progress. (2013c). Trend in fourth-grade NAEP reading achievement-level results, by type of school. What proportions of student groups are reaching proficient? The Nation’s Report Card. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013/#/student-groups
  81. National Assessment of Education Progress. (2013d). Trend in eighth-grade NAEP reading achievement-level results, by type of school. What proportions of student groups are reaching proficient? The Nation’s Report Card. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013/#/student-groups
  82. National Assessment of Education Progress. (2015a). “Mathematics and reading assessments: Percentage at or above proficient.” National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Nation’s Report Card.” Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#mathematics?grade=4
  83. National Assessment of Education Progress. (2015b). “Mathematics and reading assessments: Percentage at or above proficient.” National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Nation’s Report Card.” Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#reading?grade=4
  84. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013a). “Reading: 2013 Trial urban district snapshot for Atlanta Public Schools. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/dst2013/pdf/2014467XA8.pdf
  85. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013b). “Mathematics: 2013 Trial urban district snapshot for Atlanta Public Schools. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/dst2013/pdf/2014468XA8.pdf
  86. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013c). “Percentage distribution of students enrolled in public elementary and secondary schools, by race/ethnicity: Fall 2002, fall 2012, and fall 2024,” Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cge.asp
  87. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013d). “Public School Teacher Data File,” 1987–1988 through 2011–2012. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_209.10.asp
  88. National Council of Teachers of English. (2014). “Why class size matters today.” National Council of Teachers of English. Urbana, IL: Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/why-class-size-matters
  89. National Education Association. (2008). “Class size reduction: A proven reform strategy.” National Education Policy and Practice Department: Center for Great Public Schools. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/PB08_ClassSize08.pdf
  90. Neckerman, K. M. (2007). Schools betrayed: Roots of failure in inner-city education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Nieto, S. (1992). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  92. Perry, T., Steele, C., & Hilliard, A. (2003). Young, gifted and black. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  93. Reeves, D. B. (2003). High performance in high poverty schools: 90/90/90 and beyond. Center for Performance Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.lmsvsd.net/cms/lib2/CA01001633/Centricity/Domain/566/90%20Schools.pdf
  94. Ripley, A. (2013). The smartest kids in the world: And how they got that way. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  95. Romero, A. F. (2010). At war with the state in order to save the lives of our children: The battle of ethnic studies in Arizona. Black Scholar, 40(4), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rury, J. L. (2013). Education and social change: Contours in the history of American schooling. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  97. Russlynn, A., & Jerald, C. D. (2001). Dispelling the myth revisited: Preliminary findings from a nationwide analysis of “high-flying” schools. Washington, D.C.: The Education Trust Inc.Google Scholar
  98. Saluja, G., Early, D. M., & Clifford, R. M. (2002). Demographic characteristics of early Childhood teachers and structural elements of early care and education in the United States. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 4(1). Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/saluja.html.
  99. Shaunessy, E., & McHatton, P. A. (2009). Urban students’ perceptions of teachers: Views of students in general, special, and honors education. Urban Review, 41(5), 486–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Spring, J. (2005). Conflict of interests: The politics of American education (5th). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  101. Stack, C. B. (1993). The culture of gender: Women and men of color. In M. J. Larrabee (Ed.), An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives, pp. 108–111. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Stein, S. J. (2004). The culture of educational policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  103. Strauss, V. (2014). School district bans classroom discussion on Michael Brown, Ferguson. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/08/26/school-district-bans-classroom-discussion-on-michael-brown-ferguson/
  104. The White House. (2015). White House report: The Every Student Succeeds Act. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/10/white-house-report-every-student-succeeds-act
  105. Walker, H. M., & Sprague, J. R. (1999). The path to school failure, delinquency, and violence: Casual factors and some potential solutions. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(2), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wiggan, G. (2007). Race, school achievement and educational inequality: Towards a student-based inquiry perspective. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 310–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wiggan, G. (2008). From opposition to engagement: Lessons from high achieving African American students. The Urban Review, 40(4), 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wiggan, G. (2014). Student achievement for whom? High-performing and ‘still playing the game’, the meaning of school achievement among high achieving African American students. The Urban Review, 46(3), 476–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wilson, A. N. (1992). Awakening the natural genius of black children. New York, NY: Afrikan World InfoSystems.Google Scholar
  110. Woodson, C. G. (1977). The Miseducation of the negro. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
  111. US Census Bureau. (2015a). Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060: Estimates and projections. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  112. US Census Bureau. (2015b). New census bureau report analyzes US population predictions. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-tps16.html
  113. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNCC College of EducationCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.Elementary Education DepartmentTowson UniversityTowsonUSA

Personalised recommendations