Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 647–667 | Cite as

Revealing the Community Within: Valuing the Role of Local Community Structures Within Evidence-Based School Intervention Programmes

  • Joanna McIntyre
  • Rupert Knight
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Schools and the families they serve are sometimes perceived as deficient and in need of fixing. One response has been the implementation of evidence-based family intervention programmes, which may be highly regulated and prescriptive as a condition of their (often philanthropic) funding. This article seeks to explore and bring to the foreground the often hidden role of the pre-existing, informal community networks with a view to more authentic evaluation of these externally imposed programmes. The article draws on a range of qualitative data reflecting the lived experiences of participants—including parents and other community members—in a family and parenting programme at an English primary school. The analysis uses the work of Tönnies as a theoretical lens. It suggests that while there are tensions caused by the rigid requirements of external programmes, these are overcome in many cases by the highly effective, but often unacknowledged, contributions of the informal aspects of community. It is argued that these operate within and complement the formal programme. Far from subverting the more overt procedures, they actually enable it to function successfully, leading to additional, unanticipated transformations among participants. The article concludes that these organic, often invisible connections need to be identified, documented and nurtured if their full potential is to be recognised and realised when evaluating similar interventions.

Keywords

Families Parenting Intervention Philanthropy Home–school 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bagley, C., & Hillyard, S. (2014). Rural schools, social capital and the Big Society: A theoretical and empirical exposition. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, N., Kearns, A., & Livingston, M. (2012). Place attachment in deprived neighbourhoods: The impacts of population turnover and social mix. Housing Studies, 27(2), 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S. (2012). Voting with dollars: Philanthropy, money and education policy. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 20(3), 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, N. (2013). Understanding Ferdinand Tönnies’ community and society: Social theory and political philosophy between enlightened individuals and transfigured community. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, D. (2011). PM’s speech on Big Society. Retrieved 25th Aug, 2016 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-on-big-society.
  7. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 19(Supplement), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The rational reconstruction of society: 1992 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croninger, R. G. & Malen, B. (2002). The role of school governance in the creation of school community. In K. A. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 281–320). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crozier, G., & Davies, J. (2007). Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home–school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cullen, S., Cullen, M., Lindsay, G., & Strand, S. (2013). The parenting early intervention programme in England, 2006–2011; A classed experience? British Educational Research Journal, 39(6), 1025–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummings, C., Dyson, A., & Todd, L. (2011). Beyond the school gates: Can full service and extended schools overcome disadvantage?. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Durand, T. (2011). Latina mothers’ cultural beliefs about their children, parental roles and education: implications for effective and empowering home–school partnerships. The Urban Review, 43, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Education Endowment Foundation (EEF). (2015). Parental engagement. Retrieved 24th Aug, 2016 from: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/parental-involvement/.
  15. Flint, N. (2011). Schools, communities and social capital: Building blocks in the ‘Big Society’. Nottingham: NCSL.Google Scholar
  16. Furman, G. (Ed.). (2002). School as community. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gatt, S., Ojala, M., & Soler, M. (2011). Promoting social inclusion counting with everyone: Learning Communities and INCLUD-ED. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gewirtz, S. (2001). Cloning the Blairs: New Labour’s programme for the re-socialization of working-class parents. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillies, V. (2005). Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of ‘support’ and ‘inclusion’ in family policy. Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guerra, N., & Knox, L. (2008). How culture impacts the dissemination and implementation of innovation: Case study of the families and schools together program (FAST) for preventing violence with immigrant Latino youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guthrie, D., Arum, R., Roksa, J. & Damaske, S. (2007). Giving to local schools: Corporate philanthropy, tax incentives and the ecology of need. Retrieved 25th Aug, 2016 from: http://www.guthrie-associates.com/publications/csr/Guthrie-CSR-Corporate-Philanthropy-and-Local-Schools.pdf.
  22. HM Government (2013) What works: Evidence centres for social policy. Retrieved 25th Aug, 2016 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/136227/What_Works_publication.pdf.
  23. Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family–school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindsay, G., & Strand, S. (2013). Evaluation of the national roll-out of parenting programmes across England: The parenting early intervention programme (PEIP). Public Health, 13, 972.Google Scholar
  25. Lupton, R. (2014). Raising teachers’ voice on achievement in urban schools in England: An afterword. The Urban Review, 46, 919–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, J., Tett, L., & Kay, H. (1999). Developing collaborative partnerships: Limits and possibilities for schools, parents and community education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 9(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayer, V. (2008). Crafting a new conservative consensus on welfare reform: redefining citizenship, social provision and the public/private divide. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 15(2), 154–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merz, C., & Furman, G. (1997). Community and schools: Promise and paradox. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Punch, K., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saltman, K. (2015). Learning from the neoliberal movement: Towards a global justice education movement. Journal of Educational Administration and History., 47(3), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Organizations or communities? Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, G. (2013). From question to inquiry: Operationalizing the case study for research in teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 39(5), 590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomson, P., Hall, C., Jones, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2012). The signature pedagogies project: Final report. London: Creativity, Culture and Education. Retrieved 25th Aug, 2016 from: http://www.creativetallis.com/uploads/2/2/8/7/2287089/signature_pedagogies_report_final_version_11.3.12.pdf).
  37. Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and civil society (originally published 1887, trans: Harris, J., & Hollis, M.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tönnies, F. (2002). Community and society (originally published 1887, trans: Loomis, C. P.). Newton Abbot: David and Charles.Google Scholar
  39. Tricarico, K., Jacobs, J., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2015). Reflection on their first five years of teaching: Understanding staying and impact power. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Villenas, S. (2001). Latina mothers and small-town racisms: Creating narratives of dignity and moral education in North Carolina. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White, J., Drew, S., & Hay, T. (2009). Ethnography versus case study. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(1), 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Jubilee CampusUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options