Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 149–174 | Cite as

Moving Toward An Empowering Setting in a First Grade Classroom Serving Primarily Working Class and Working Poor Latina/o Children: An Exploratory Analysis

  • Janelle M. Silva
  • Regina Day Langhout
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Empowering settings are important places for people to develop leadership skills in order to enact social change. Yet, due to socio-cultural constructions of childhood in the US, especially constructions around working class and working poor children of Color, they are often not seen as capable or competent change agents, or in need of being in empowering settings. Based on a 9-month participant observation study of a first grade public charter school classroom in central California, this paper examines how one teacher used an alternative, artist-focused curriculum to take steps to facilitate a more empowering setting for her working class and working poor students, most of whom were Latina/o. We illustrate how this teacher worked to implement the components of an empowering setting within her classroom space: community building, peer-based support, meaningful roles, and shared leadership among her students. Student and teacher interviews are also used to triangulate findings. Implications include providing ways to assist young children as they become social change agents.

Keywords

Empowering setting Children Elementary school Working class/working poor Latina/o 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ms. Monet, her first grade students, and the staff, faculty and families at Strawberry Fields Elementary School. We also thank Danielle Rios for her work on this project.

References

  1. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why ‘what worked’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, E. L. (2002). Mrs. Boyd’s fifth-grade inclusive classroom: A study of multicultural teaching strategies. Urban Education, 37(1), 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. V. (2008). Effectively educating Latino/a students: A comparative study of participation patterns of Hispanic American and Anglo-American university students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(2), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. California Department of Education. (2007). Strawberry Fields School racial demographics, 2001–2007. http://www.cde.ca.gov/
  5. Clark, A. (2005). Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornell Empowerment Group. (1989). Empowerment through family support. Networking Bulletin, 1(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  8. Creighton, G., Oliffe, J. L., Butterwick, S., & Saewyc, E. (2013). After the death of a friend: Young men’s grief and masculine identities. Social Science and Medicine, 84, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delpit, L. (1995). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  10. Durand, T., & Lykes, M. B. (2006). Think globally, act locally: A global perspective on mobilizing adults for positive youth development. In E. G. Clary & J. E. Rhodes (Eds.), Mobilizing adults for positive youth development: Strategies for closing the gap between beliefs and behaviors (pp. 233–254). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dworski-Riggs, D., & Langhout, R. D. (2010). Elucidating the power in empowerment and the participation in participatory action research: A story about research team and elementary school change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3), 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emerson, R. L., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epstein, D. (1993). Too small to notice? Constructions of childhood and discourses of ‘race’ in predominantly white contexts. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 1(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography step by step (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Gaines, S. O., Marelich, W. D., Bledsoe, K. L., Steers, W. N., Henderson, M. C., Granrose, C. S., et al. (1997). Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1460–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruber, J., & Trickett, E. J. (1987). Can we empower others? The paradox of empowerment in the governing of an alternative public school. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(3), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayward, C. R. (2000). Defacing power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinchliffe, G. (2010). Action in a shared world. Teachers College Record, 112(2), 446–463.Google Scholar
  20. hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hurtado, A. (1996). The color of privilege: Three blasphemies on race and feminism. Ann Arbor, MI: Univeristy of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ishimaru, A., Gordon, C. J., & Cervantes, R. (2011). “A match on dray grass:” Organizing for great schools in San Jose. In M. R. Warren & K. Mapp (Eds.), A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform (pp. 33–65). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jennings, L. B., & Mills, H. (2009). Living a discourse of inquiry: Findings from a 5-year enthnographic study. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1583–1618.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, L., & Campbell-Stephens, R. (2010). Investing in diversity in London schools: Leadership preparation for black and global majority leaders. Urban Education, 45(6), 840–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keedy, J. L., & Drmacich, D. (1994). The collaborative curriculum at the school without walls: Empowering students for classroom learning. Urban Review, 26(2), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. In J. Rappaport & R. E. Hess (Eds.), Studies in empowerment: Steps towards understanding and action (pp. 9–37). New York: Hawthorne Press.Google Scholar
  27. Laguardia, A., & Pearl, A. (2009). Necessary educational reform for the 21st century: The future of public schools in our democracy. Urban Review, 41(4), 352–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langhout, R. D. (2004). Facilitators and inhibitors of positive school feelings: An exploratory study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langhout, R. D. (2005). Acts of resistance: Student (in)visibility. Culture & Psychology, 11(2), 123–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langhout, R. D., Kohfeldt, D. M., & Ellison, E. R. (2011). How we became the Schmams: Conceptualizations of fairness in the decision-making process for Latina/o children. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langhout, R. D., & Thomas, E. (2010). Imagining participatory action research in collaboration with children: An introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larson, R., Jarrett, R., Hansen, D., Pearce, N., Sullivan, P., Walker, K., et al. (2004). Organized youth activities as contexts for positive development. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 540–560). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Llewellyn, K. R., Cook, S. A., & Molina, A. (2010). Civic learning: Moving from the apolitical to the socially just. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(6), 791–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maton, K. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maton, K. I., & Brodsky, A. E. (2010). Empowering community settings: Theory, research, and action. In M. S. Aber, K. I. Maton, E. Seidman, & J. G. Kelly (Eds.), Empowering settings and voices for social change (pp. 38–64). New York: Oxford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McMillan, C. B. (1975). Organizational change in schools: Bedford-Stuyvesant. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 11, 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mikel Brown, L. (1999). Raising their voices: The politics of girls’ anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nasir, N. S. (2003). The cultural construction of moral and civic identities. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Putney, L. G., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Developing collective classroom efficacy: The teacher’s role as community organizer. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Riger, S. (1993). What’s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(3), 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarason, S. (2004). And What do YOU mean by learning?. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  45. Schultz, K., & Coleman-King, C. (2012). Becoming visible: Shifting teacher practice to actively engage new immigrant students in urban classrooms. Urban Review, 44(4), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Speed, S. (2007). Exercising rights and reconfiguring resistance in the Zapatista juntas de buen gobierno. In M. Goodale & S. E. Merry (Eds.), The practice of human rights: Tracking law between the global and the local (pp. 163–192). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., & Hernandez, E. (2003). Parent involvement in schooling: According to whose values? The School Community Journal, 13(2), 45–72.Google Scholar
  48. Van Sluys, K. (2010). Trying on and trying out: Participatory action research as a tool for literacy and identity work in middle grades classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2000). Citizen participation and community organizations. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 247–272). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warren, M. R., & Mapp, K. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wilke, L. A., & Speer, P. W. (2011). The mediating influence of organizational characteristics in the relationship between organizational type and relational power: An extension of psychological empowerment research. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(8), 972–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wood, D., Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 80(1), 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8(2), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York & London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Washington, BothellBothellUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options