Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 73–100 | Cite as

Practices of Exemplary Transformative Teachers, as Perceived by Students Transformed by an Urban High School Social Justice Course

  • Marinda K. Harrell-Levy
  • Jennifer L. Kerpelman
  • Daniel J. Henry
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Transformative urban high school teachers utilize a transformative pedagogical style in their classrooms to augment students’ learning experiences and cultivate development in their students. Largely unexamined, however, is how the tools of transformative pedagogy used in secondary classrooms compare with those used in other contexts and with other kinds of students, particularly adolescent learners. The purpose of the present study is to gain an understanding of teaching practices facilitating transformative learning in a mandatory, high school social justice course in an urban setting. To assess this, black students of a transformative Social Justice course were interviewed, along with current and former teachers of the course, and other faculty and administrators. Additionally, alumni of this course were surveyed and a range of curriculum materials were analyzed to determine the actual pedagogy and practices. Findings indicated that, despite a prevailing research focus on adult learners in the transformative field, transformative practices at the high school level are largely comparable to those practiced at the post-high school level, such as using tools for critical self-reflection and individuation. Furthermore, using some additional approaches, the teachers make use of the developmental timing of adolescence to create a class experience that is particularly edifying and, potentially, enduring.

Keywords

Adolescence Social justice Transformative Pedagogy Black 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, M., Bell, L. A., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Teaching for diversity and social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., Pianta, G. A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lum, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.1207998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Applebaum, B. (2008). ‘Doesn’t my experience count?’ White students, the authority of experience and SJ pedagogy. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11(4), 405–414. doi: 10.1080/13613320802478945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08317501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. (2002). Social-emotional factors affecting achievement outcomes among disadvantaged students: Closing the achievement gap. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 197–214. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3704_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buxton, C. A. (2010). Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching and learning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. F. (2009). A Social Justice epistemology and pedagogy for Latina/o students: Transforming public education with participatory action research. New Directions for Youth Development, 123, 53–65. doi: 10.1002/yd.314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coke, P. K. (2005). Practicing what we preach: An argument for cooperative learning opportunities for elementary and secondary educators. Education, 126(2), 392–398.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, A. L. (1996). Making and molding identity in schools: Student narratives on race, gender and academic engagement. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dirkx, J. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7, 1–14.Google Scholar
  13. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the ‘burden of ‘acting white’. Urban Review, 18, 176–206. doi: 10.1007/BF01112192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, J., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the impact of policy and practice interventions on high school dropout and school completion rates: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 205–248.Google Scholar
  16. Giroux, H. (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  17. Granic, I., Dishion, T. J., & Hollenstein, T. (2006). The family ecology of adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective on normative development. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470756607.ch4.Google Scholar
  18. Harrell-Levy, M. K., & Kerpelman, J. L. (2010). Identity process and transformative pedagogy: Teachers as agents of identity formation. Identity: An international journal of theory and research, 10(2), 76–91. doi: 10.1080/15283481003711684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrell-Levy, M. K., Kerpelman, J. L., & Henry, D. (2016). “Minds were forced wide open”: Black adolescents' identity exploration in a transformative social justice class? Education, Citizenship, and Social Justice, 1, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/1746197915626075.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, M. P., & Metcalf, L. E. (1955). Teaching high school social studies. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter, E. (1998). Adolescent attraction to cults. Adolescence, 33(131), 709–714.Google Scholar
  22. Kember, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award winning teachers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kitchenham, A. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(2), 104–123. doi: 10.1177/1541344608322678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kvale, S. (2009). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. doi: 10.3102/00028312032003465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school structuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66(3), 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Margonis, F. (2011). In pursuit of respectful teaching and intellectually-dynamic social fields. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(5), 433–439. doi: 10.1007/s11217-011-9242-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Muhr, T. (2004). ATLAS.ti 5.0 [Version 5:]. Berlin, Germany: ATLAS.ti scientific software development. http://www.atlasti.com/.
  33. North, C. E. (2006). More than words? Delving into the substantive meaning(s) of ‘social justice’ in education. Review of Educational Research, 76, 507–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Neill, T. B. (2010). Fostering spaces of student ownership in middle school science. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(1), 6–20. doi: 10.1080/10665680903484909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, G. (2011). Adult English language learners constructing and sharing their stories and experiences: The cultural and linguistic autobiography writing project. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 156–172. doi: 10.5054/tj.2011.250378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parke, R. D., MacDonald, K. B., Bietel, A., & Bhavnagri, N. (1988). The role of the family in the development of peer relationships. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Social learning and systems approaches to marriage and the family (pp. 17–44). New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., McKnight, Y.-M., & Beers, J. (2004). Re/Making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sealey-Ruiz, Y., & Greene, P. (2011). Embracing urban youth culture in the context of education. Urban Review, 43, 339–357. doi: 10.1007/s11256-010-0156-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seiler, G., & Gonsalves, A. (2010). Student-powered science: Science education for and by African American students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 88–104. doi: 10.1080/10665680903489361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Sullivan, P. J., & Larson, R. W. (2010). Connecting youth to high-resource adults: Lessons from effective youth programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 99–123. doi: 10.1177/0743558409350505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thadani, V., Cook, M. S., Griffis, K., Wise, J. A., & Blakey, A. (2010). The possibilities and limitations of curriculum-based science inquiry interventions for challenging the “pedagogy of poverty”. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 21–37. doi: 10.1080/10665680903408908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tzou, C., Scalone, G., & Bell, B. (2010). The role of environmental narratives and social positioning in how place gets constructed for and by youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vincent, C. (2003). Social justice, education and identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zeldin, S. (2000). Integrating research and practice to understand and strengthen communities for adolescent development: An introduction to the special issue and current issues. Applied Developmental Science, 4(Suppl. 1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marinda K. Harrell-Levy
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Kerpelman
    • 2
  • Daniel J. Henry
    • 2
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State University, BrandywineMediaUSA
  2. 2.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options