Youth Participatory Action Research as an Approach to Sociopolitical Development and the New Academic Standards: Considerations for Educators
- 1.3k Downloads
Administrators and teachers face changes prompted by the shift to Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) offers a promising approach to supporting students in mastering new content standards, while also offering experiences that promote their sociopolitical development and civic agency. In YPAR, students work with a teacher or other adult ally to critically reflect upon the social and political forces influencing their lives, identify a pressing problem or school need, study it through systematic research, and then develop an action plan to raise awareness or change a policy. Because of its emphasis on educational relevance, critical consciousness, and social justice, YPAR is an especially promising strategy with young people who experience racism or other forms of marginalization in school. In this article we describe the YPAR cycle, make an argument for how it creates opportunities for academic learning, sociopolitical development, and youth leadership, and provide examples of what this might look like in practice. YPAR offers a curricular approach that addresses academic objectives while also supporting democratic education and the sociopolitical development of students.
KeywordsCommon core National Generation Science Standards English Language Arts Sociopolitical development Youth Participatory Action Research
All four authors would like to thank the American Education Research Association for funds that supported a research conference addressing themes in this issue. Ozer's research on youth-led participatory research described in this chapter was supported by a William T. Grant Scholars’ Award and funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ozer thanks the high school students who participated in the UC-Berkeley Peer Resources YPAR projects; San Francisco Peer Resources and SFUSD for collaboration in the research projects; and the University of California-Berkeley graduate and undergraduate research teams who assisted with the research. Kirshner would also like to thank the Spencer Foundation for funds that supported the design and implementation of Critical Civic Inquiry.
- Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Boston Arts Academy. (2014). Voices from humanities 2: Perspectives on power and politics from artist-scholars at Boston Arts Academy. https://voicesfromhumanities2.wordpress.com/youth-participatory-action-research-ypar-projects/. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- Cabrera, N. L., Milem, J. F., Jaquette, O., & Marx, R. W. (2014). Missing the (student achievement) for all the (political) trees: Empiricism and the Mexican American studies controversy in Tucson. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1084–1118. doi: 10.3102/002831214553705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. (2006). A critically compassionate intellectualism for Latina/o students: Raising voices above the silencing in our schools. Multiculturalism Education, 14(2), 16–23.Google Scholar
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts, literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
- Common Core State Standards. (2013). Closing the expectations gap 2013 annual report on the alignment of state K-12 policies and practice with the demands of college and careers. http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
- Common Core State Standards. (2015). English language arts standards. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/CCRA/R/. Retrieved 1 Jan 2015.
- Cornell University Cooperative Extension. (2015). Act for youth center for excellence. http://www.actforyouth.net/youth_development/evaluation/. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC).Google Scholar
- Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Dworski-Riggs, D., & Langhout, R. D. (2010). Elucidating the power in empowerment and the participation in participatory action research: A story about research team and elementary school change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 215–230. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9306-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2004). Re-membering exclusions: Participatory action research in public institutions. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 15–37.Google Scholar
- Flores, K. S. (2007). Youth participatory evaluation: Strategies for engaging young people (Vol. 14). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Friere, P. (1990). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Hopper, K. (1999). John Berger and Erick Holtzman. Social Policy, 30(2), 13–21.Google Scholar
- Kirshner, B. (2015). Youth activism in an era of education inequality. New York, NY: University Press.Google Scholar
- Kirshner, B., & Polman, J. L. (2013). Adaptation by design: A context-sensitive, dialogic approach to interventions. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 112(2), 215–236.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, J. L., Harris, A. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduling hypothesis. Social Policy Report, 20(4), 3–31.Google Scholar
- Mathis, W. J. (2010). The “Common Core” standards initiative: An effective reform tool? Boulder and Tempe: Education and The Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. http://epicpolicy.org/publication/common-core-standards. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
- Mitra, D. L. (2008). Amplifying student voice. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 20–25.Google Scholar
- National Governor’s Association for Best Practices. (2010). College and career-training ready standards. http://www.nga.org/cms/home/nga-center-for-best-practices/center-divisions/center-issues/page-edu-issues/col2-content/main-content-list/college-and-career-training-read.html. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: The Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Ozer, E. J. (2015). Youth-Led Participatory Action Research. In L. A. Jason, & Glenwick, S. D. (Eds). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ozer, E. J., Cantor, J. P., Cruz, G. W., Fox, B., Hubbard, E., & Moret, L. (2008). The diffusion of youth-led participatory research in urban schools: The role of the prevention support system in implementation and sustainability. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Phillips, E. N., Berg, M. J., Rodriguez, C., & Morgan, D. (2010). A case study of participatory action research in a public New England middle school: Empowerment, constraints and challenges. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 179–194. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9336-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Bourdillon, M., Robson, E., Munthali, A., Abane, A., & Mashiri, M. (2010). Children as research collaborators: Issues and reflections from a mobility study in sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 215–227. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9317-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Public Science Project. (2015). The public science project: Participatory action research, and design for a just world. http://publicscienceproject.org/resources/. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. In D. Preiss & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163–194). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Rothman, R. (2011). Something in common: The common core standards and the next chapter in American education. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Rubin, B., & Jones, M. (2007). Student action research: reaping the benefits for students and school leaders. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 91, 363–378.Google Scholar
- Silva, E., Zimmerman, K., & Erbstein, N. (2001). Youth rep step by step: An introduction to youth-led evaluation and research. Oakland, CA: Youth in Focus.Google Scholar
- Stanford University. (2014). John W. Gardner center for youth and their communities. http://gardnercenter.stanford.edu/. Retrieved 13 April 2015.
- Sydlo, S. J. (2000). Participatory action research: Curriculum for empowering youth. Hartford, CN: National Teen Action Research Center.Google Scholar
- The Institute for Community Research. (2014). Research partnerships for healthy communities: Participatory action research training and evaluation. http://www.incommunityresearch.org/research/paresearch.htm. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- University of California, Davis. (2014). Center for regional change: Putting youth on the map. http://interact.regionalchange.ucdavis.edu/youth/about.html. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- University of Colorado, Denver. (2014). Critical civic inquiry. http://www.ucdenver.edu/about/newsroom/newsreleases/Pages/grant-fundsresearch-on-middle-and-high-school-issues.aspx. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
- Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 171–181. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wernick, L. J., Woodford, M. R., & Siden, J. (2011). Youth-led participatory action research: Fostering effective youth–adult partnerships. In L. M. Harter, J. Hamel Lambert, & J. Millesen (Eds.), Case studies in community-based participatory research (pp. 165–186). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishers.Google Scholar
- Yonas, M. A., Burke, J. G., Rak, K., Bennett, A., Kelly, V., & Gielen, A. C. (2009). A picture’s worth a thousand words: engaging youth in CBPR using the creative arts. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 3(4), 349. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- York, A., & Kirshner, B. (in press). How positioning shapes student engagement in action civics. In. J. Conner (Ed.), Student voice in American education policy. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook.Google Scholar
- Zeldin, S., Petrokubi, J., & MacNeil, C. (2008). Youth–adult partnerships in decision making: Disseminating and implementing an innovative idea into established organizations and communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 262–277. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9158-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar