The Urban Review

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 803–808 | Cite as

Sociopolitical Development in Educational Systems: From Margins to Center

  • Ben KirshnerEmail author
  • Carlos Hipolito-Delgado
  • Shelley Zion


This is a challenging moment for supporters of public education: the status quo is untenable but the options offered by “reformers” appear equally dangerous. In this context we need arguments for the democratic purposes of education that offer an alternative to existing inequities on one hand and technocratic or privatized solutions on the other. New formations of parents, teachers, and young people call for schools that raise young people who feel connected to their communities, can critically interpret their social and political worlds, and possess the academic skills and agency to empower their communities (Warren in Transforming public education: the need for an education justice movement. N Engl J Public Policy 26(1), Article 11., 2015). This special issue, which originated in a series of interdisciplinary seminars, proposes sociopolitical development (SPD) as a core feature of democratic education and human development. Making SPD central to education requires a compelling mix of theory, rigorous evidence, and practical strategy. In this article we provide a scholarly context for SPD in education and introduce the contents of the special issue.


Sociopolitical development Equity Critical consciousness Youth 


  1. Cabrera, N. L., Milem, J. F., Jaquette, O., & Marx, R. W. (2014). Missing the (student achievement) for all the (political) trees: Empiricism and the Mexican American studies controversy in Tucson. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1084–1118. doi: 10.3102/0002831214553705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, P., & Welner, K. (Eds.). (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freire, P. (1970/2002). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Ginwright, S. (2015). Hope and healing in urban education: How urban activists and teachers are reclaiming matters of the heart. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2011). Youth organizing in the Wild West: Mobilizing for educational justice in Arizona! Voices in Urban Education, 30, 13–21.Google Scholar
  7. Green, E. (2010). Building a better teacher. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from
  8. Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirshner, B. (2015). Youth activism in an era of education inequality. New York, NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Milner, R. (2013). Policy reforms and de-professionalization of teaching. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.Google Scholar
  12. Otterman, S. (2011). Ed Schools’ pedagogical puzzle. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  13. Ozer, E. J., & Wright, D. (2012). Beyond school spirit: The effects of youth-led participatory action research in two urban high schools. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 267–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00780.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Santos, F. (2012). Tucson schools overhaul a program to help struggling hispanic students. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  15. Vevea, B. (2013). CPS wants to close first Renaissance schools. WBEZ. Retrieved from
  16. Warren, M. (2015). Transforming public education: The need for an education justice movement. New Englanf Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), Article 11.
  17. Watts, R. J., Williams, N. C., & Jagers, R. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2008). Critical bifocality and circuits of privilege: Expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harvard Educational Review, 82(2), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Kirshner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlos Hipolito-Delgado
    • 2
  • Shelley Zion
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.University of Colorado DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations