The Urban Review

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 846–859 | Cite as

Addressing Barriers to Minority Ethnic Students’ Learning in a Performative Culture: Possible or Aan u SuuraGelin? Niemożliwe? Nemoguće? ناممکن?

Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article, written by a research-active teacher of English with an academic partner, recounts the circumstances of forging a partnership way of working in an urban high school that is consistently targeted for closure in the north of England. This is connected to performance and achievement against Ofsted inspection criteria and school data benchmarked against national data. The article proceeds with a recollection of the teacher’s battle for professional recognition when it comes to the intellectual and practical arguments for curriculum and classroom practices that are tailored to the learning needs of different minority ethnic students, who have to negotiate language barriers to schooling. This more professional view of what is to be done draws on evidence built up in the course of a teacher inquiry project, which needed the sanction of the School Improvement Officer assigned by the Local Authority, who recommended a focus on achievement in the teacher’s bottom set Year 7 English class. The experience points toward research-informed teaching, which stands in marked distinction to being compelled to ‘teach to the test’ in classes that are set. The article illustrates a union argument that teachers’ professional responsibilities are linked to a struggle to reclaim the right to make professional decisions.

Keywords

Inequalities Evidence Ofsted inspections Toxic accountability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Allen, T. (2013). Drivers and barriers to raising achievement: A focus on school and classroom level influences. Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) access and achievement: Background papers. http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/access-and-achievement-background-papers.
  2. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2008). Performativity, privatisation, professionals and the state. In B. Cunningham (Ed.), Exploring professionalism. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2013). 'Other to myself' What it means to be a teacher in the twenty-first century. In L. Beckett (Ed.), Teacher education through active engagement: Raising the professional voice (Foreword). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, L. (2012). Engaging democratic educational politics against school closure. In W. T. Pink (Ed.), Schools for marginalized youth. An international perspective, Chap. 7. New York: Hampton Press Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Beckett, L. & Gallagher, K. (2014). Practitioner research to improve students’ learning outcomes in the north of England: Possible or impossible? Paper for BERA annual conference, London, 23–25 September.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, S. & Wrigley, T. (2013). The struggle for social justice: A focus on students in poverty. In L. Beckett (Ed.), Teacher education through active engagement: Raising the professional voice, Chap. 11. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Chitty, C. (2004) Eugenic theories and concepts of ability. In Benn & Chitty (Eds.), A tribute to Caroline Benn. Education and democracy, Chap. 7. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dinkins, D. (2009). Teachers talk about race, class and achievement. In M. Cochran-Smith & S. Lytle (Eds.), Inquiry as stance practitioner research for the next generation, Chap. 9. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Drummond, M. J., & Yarker, P. (2013). Editorial: The enduring problem of fixed ability: But is a new conversation beginning? Forum, 55(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.Google Scholar
  13. Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2005). Teachers and schooling making a difference. Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, R. S. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap. How to measure equity in our schools. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, R. S., & La Salle, R. A. (2010). Data strategies to uncover and eliminate hidden inequities. The wallpaper effect. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lupton, R. (2006). Schools in disadvantaged areas: Low attainment and a contextualised policy response. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. A. Dillabough & A. A. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization, and social change, Chap. 45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Milner, R. H. (2013). Rethinking achievement gap talk in urban education. Urban Education, 48(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tan, J. (2013). RAISEonline half-truths and other fictions about attainment gaps. In L. Beckett (Ed.), Teacher education through active engagement: Raising the professional voice, Chap. 2. London, New York: Routledge Research in Education Policy and Politics series.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.YorkshireUK
  2. 2.Leeds Metropolitan UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations