Advertisement

The Urban Review

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 433–465 | Cite as

An Exploration of the Impact of Accountability Testing on Teaching in Urban Elementary Classrooms

  • Beverly Milner Bisland
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study explores accountability testing in the elementary schools of New York City with particular emphasis on the impact of a statewide social studies test on the value given to social studies instruction in comparison to other subjects. The attitudes of a group of elementary teachers are examined. Some of the teachers taught all subjects in the curriculum and others taught only social studies. Through mixed method research this study reveals that, even with a statewide test and social studies specialists created to meet the demands of the test, social studies is valued less than language arts and math, two of the other major curriculum areas that are also tested. Factors influencing this finding are the social studies test’s role in determining the adequate yearly progress report for schools and the promotion of students within New York state’s accountability system, as compared to other subjects. This exploratory study adds to the research on the narrowing of the curriculum in the elementary schools and considers the impact of a statewide test in social studies and the presence of social studies specialists in response to the test.

Keywords

Elementary Curriculum narrowing Integrated learning Accountability Testing Mixed methodology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bisland, B. M. (2009). Two traditions in the social studies curriculum for the elementary grades: The textbooks of Paul R. Hanna and Harold O. Rugg. Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(2), 155–196.Google Scholar
  3. Bisland, B. M. (2011). The marginalization of social studies in the elementary school: An overview. In W. B. Russell III (Ed.), Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 173–191). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  4. Bisland B. M., O’Connor, E. A., & Malow, M. S. (2009/2010) Perspectives, practices and constraints in social studies instruction: A case study of alternatively certified elementary teachers. International Journal of Social Education, 24(2), 117–144.Google Scholar
  5. Bolick, C. M., Adams, R., & Wilcox, L. (2010). The marginalization of elementary social studies in teacher education. Social Studies Research and Practice, 5(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
  6. Bolgatz, J. (2006). Using primary documents with fourth-grade students: Talking about racism while preparing for state-level tests. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 133–156). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle-Baise, M., Hsu, M.-C., Johnson, S., Serriere, S., & Stewart, D. (2008). Putting reading first: Teaching social studies in elementary classrooms. Theory and Research in Social Education, 36(3), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (2002). A caveat: Curriculum integration isn’t always a good idea. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 66.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1997). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burroughs, S., Groce, E., & Webeck, M. L. (2005). Social studies education in the age of testing and accountablility. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cimbricz, S. (2002a). January 9)State testing and teachers’ thinking and practice: A syntheses of research. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
  13. Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denscombe, M. (1998). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1938/1977). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Doppen, F., Misco, T., & Patterson, N. (2008). The state of K-12 social studies instruction in Ohio. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
  17. Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2010). A national perspective on the effects of high-stakes testing and standardization on elementary social studies marginalization. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(1), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fry, S. W. (2009). On borrowed time: How four elementary preservice teachers learned to teach social studies in the NCLB era. Social Studies Research and Practice, 4(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, S. G. (2000). Teachers and tests: Exploring teachers’ perceptions of changes in the New York state testing program. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(14), 1–28.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, S. G. (2006). Introduction: Measuring history. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 29–56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  21. Grant, S. G., Gradwell, J. M., & Cimbricz, S. K. (2004). A question of authenticity: The document-based question as an assessment of students’ knowledge of history. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19(4), 309–337.Google Scholar
  22. Heafner, T. L., & Fitchett, P. G. (2012). Tipping the scales: National trends of declining social studies instructional time in elementary schools. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 36(2), 190–215.Google Scholar
  23. Heafner, T., Lipscomb, G. B., & Rock, T. (2006). To test or not to test? The role of testing in elementary social studies: A collaborative study conducted by NCPSSE and SCPSSE. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(2), 145–164.Google Scholar
  24. Hefferman, H. (1957). Social studies in relation to the total elementary school program. In N. B. Nelson (Ed.), Social studies in the elementary school: The fifty-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II (pp. 120–128). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hinde, E. (2009). Fractured social studies or integrated thinkers: The end results of curriculum integration. Social Studies Research and Practice, 4(5), 118–127.Google Scholar
  26. Holloway, J., & Chiodo, J. (2009). Social studies is being taught in the elementary school: A contrarian view. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(2), 235–262.Google Scholar
  27. Horn, C. (2006). The technical realities of measuring history. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 29–56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  28. Houser, N. (1995). Social studies on the back burner: Views from the field. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(2), 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hutton, L. A., & Burstein, J. H. (2008). The teaching of history-social science: Left behind or behind closed doors? Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(1), 96–108.Google Scholar
  30. Layton, D. H. (1986). The regents action plan: New York’s educational reform initiative in the 1980s. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(4), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Libresco, A. S. (2005). How she stopped worrying and learned to love the test … sort of. In E. A. Yeager & O. L. Davis (Eds.), Wise social studies teaching in an age of accountability (pp. 33–49). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  32. McEachron, G. (2010). Study of allocated social studies time in elementary classrooms in Virginia: 1987–2009. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 34(2), 208–228.Google Scholar
  33. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: NCSS.Google Scholar
  34. National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.Google Scholar
  35. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  36. Pace, J. L. (2008). Inequalities in history-social science teaching under high-stakes accountability: Interviews with fifth-grade teachers in California. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(1), 24–40.Google Scholar
  37. Passe, J., & Patterson, N. (2011). Reasserting the relevance of the social studies: An emerging model for collaborative cross-state research. Journal of Social Studies Research, 35(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  38. Popham, W. J. (1999). Where large scale assessment is heading and why it shouldn’t. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rock, T. C., Heafner, T., O’Connor, K., Passe, J., Oldendorf, S., Good, A., et al. (2006). One state closer to a national crisis: A report on elementary social studies education in North Carolina schools. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(4), 455–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Russell, W. B., III. (2009). Social studies, the lost curriculum: A research study of elementary teachers and the forces impacting the teaching of social studies. Curriculum and Teaching, 24(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaver, J., Davis, O. L., & Helburn, S. W. (1980). The status of social studies education: Impressions from three NSF studies. Social Education, 44, 150–153.Google Scholar
  42. Sunal, C. S., & Sunal, D. W. (2007). Reports from the field: Elementary teacher candidates describe the teaching of social studies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(2), 29–48.Google Scholar
  43. Van Fossen, P. J. (2005). “Reading and math take so much time…”: An overview of social studies instruction in elementary classrooms in Indiana. Theory and Research in Social Education, 33(3), 376–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Fossen, P. J., & Mcgrew, C. (2008). Is the sky really falling? An update on the status of social studies in the k-5 curriculum in Indiana. International Journal of Social Education, 23(1), 139–179.Google Scholar
  45. Vogler, K. E., Lintner, T., Lipscomb, G. B., Knopf, H., Heafner, T. L., & Rock, T. C. (2007). Getting off the back burner: Impact of testing elementary social studies as part of a state-mandated accountability program. Journal of Social Studies Research, 31(2), 20–34.Google Scholar
  46. Wills, J. S. (2007). Putting the squeeze on social studies: Mananging teaching dilemmas in subject areas excluded from state testing. Teachers College Record, 109(8), 1980–2046.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wineburg, S., & Wilson, S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching. Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (Vol. 2, pp. 305–348). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zhao, Y., & Hoge, J. D. (2005). What elementary students and teachers say about social studies. The Social Studies, 96(5), 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Web-Based References

  1. Au, W. (2013). Coring social studies within corporate education reform: The common core state standards, social justice, and the politics of knowledge in U.S. schools. Critical Education, 4(5), 1–15. http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/182278.
  2. Cimbricz, S. (2002). State testing and teachers’ thinking and practice: A syntheses of research. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2), 1–21. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n2.html.
  3. Gonen, Y. (2010, June 18). Social studies ‘ex’am. The New York Post. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/social_studies_ex_ams_J2SvMdTTkAmGbyNWf9xHGL.
  4. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System. (2008). XXII. History and social science, grade 5. www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2008/release/g5his.pdf.
  5. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.Google Scholar
  6. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards.
  7. New York State Education Department, Information and Reporting Services. (2012a). The New York state school report card. http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/.
  8. New York State Education Department, Office of Assessment Policy, Development and Administration. (2012b). Regents exams: Grade 5 social studies. http://www.nysedregents.org/Grade5/SocialStudies/home.html.
  9. New York State Education Department, Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services, Curriculum and Instruction. (2012c). Social studies standards. http://www.p12.nysed.gov/ciai/socst/socstand/home.html.
  10. New York State Education Department, Office of Teaching Initiatives (2012d). Requirements for initial certificate, childhood education (grades 1–6). http://eservices.nysed.gov/teach/certhelp/CertRequirementHelp.do.
  11. New York State Education Department, The University of the State of New York (2010). Assessment cost reduction strategies. http://www.regents.nysed.gov/meetings/2010Meetings/June2010/0610emsca5.htm.
  12. New York State Education Department, The University of the State of New York. (2005). Statistical profiles of public school districts. http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/chapter655/2005/volume2/Vol2_655_July2005_wBkmrks.pdf.
  13. Ohio Department of Education Testing. (2009). Released test materials for Ohio’s grade 3–8 achievement assessments, social studies, May 2009 partial test. http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/Templates/Pages/ODE/ODEDetail.aspx?page=3&TopicRelationID=1070&ContentID=7479&Content=121019.
  14. The National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2006). U.S. history/civics, mathematics teacher background questionnaire: Grade 4. nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/…/teacher/Q06-teacher-g08-civics.pdf.
  15. United Federation of Teachers. (2010). Our rights: Know your rights: School based positions: Cluster teachers. http://www.uft.org/our-rights/know-your-rights/cluster-teachers.
  16. United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Table 2.16. Social studies statewide assessment name, grade administered, and assessment type, by state: 2009–2010. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab2_16.asp.
  17. United States Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (1997). The social context of education (NCES 97-981). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Virginia Department of Education. (2012). Testing & standards of learning (SOL): Released tests. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/sol/released_tests/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elementary and Early Childhood Education DepartmentQueens College of the City University of New YorkFlushingUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options