Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

“If There is No Struggle, There is No Progress”: Transformative Youth Activism and the School of Ethnic Studies

Abstract

In the wake of the Tucson Unified School District dismantling its highly successful Mexican American Studies (MAS) program, students staged walkouts across the district to demonstrate their opposition. Student-led walkouts were portrayed as merely “ditching,” and students were described as not really understanding why they were protesting. After these events, a group of student activists called UNIDOS organized and led the School of Ethnic Studies. This was a community school dedicated to teaching the forbidden MAS curriculum. In this article we present counternarratives from organizers, presenters, and participants in the School of Ethnic Studies. These narratives demonstrate the transformative resistance of students who created their own form of liberatory education. Our analysis highlights how student organizers led the creation of an autonomous, community-based educational space to allowed young people to engage in political analysis, self-reflection, and strategic organizing. We conclude with the implications for Ethnic Studies, urban education, and counternarrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a line of academic inquiry which seeks to uncover how superficially race-neutral social policies can and do recreate systemic racial oppression. CRT challenges the objectivity of social science research while concurrently highlighting the value of experiential knowledge from communities of color. It was originally developed within the legal field, and has been applied in education (Ladson-Billings and Tate 1995).

  2. 2.

    For full text of HB2281, please refer to: http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/hb2281s.pdf.

  3. 3.

    For more in-depth coverage of this legal challenge, please refer to: www.saveethnicstudies.org.

  4. 4.

    Description of this event is inadequate. For video from the inside of the protest, please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPZxCDMbZec&feature=player_profilepage.

  5. 5.

    For student first-hand descriptions of this event, please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJW4q2QMZos&feature=player_embedded#! For the list of banned books, please refer to: http://drcintli.blogspot.com/2012/01/tusd-banned-books-lists.html.

  6. 6.

    http://www.tusd1.org/contents/news/press1112/01-17-12.html.

  7. 7.

    http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=767&Itemid=74&jumival=8189 (11:05).

  8. 8.

    For Dr. Pedicone’s full letter, please see: http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mlib/667/01/667_1327931624.pdf.

  9. 9.

    https://www.facebook.com/events/352274674784354/.

  10. 10.

    For images of the art event, please see: http://chrissummitt.com/blog/protestaz/unidosart/.

  11. 11.

    http://chrissummitt.com/blog/protestaz/unidosart/.

  12. 12.

    I began my student activism indirectly in junior high school (1968 Walkouts), but more directly in high school in 1970–1971, when I joined my campus MEChA.

  13. 13.

    After the January 2012 dismantling of MAS, my colleague Norma Gonzalez at MAS-TUSD was forced to take down the image of the Aztec Calendar as she was teaching it. The principal said that it was now was illegal to teach Mexican history and culture.

  14. 14.

    Precious Knowledge is a dual reference. First, is the concept of Quetzalcoatl (Quetzal = Precious/Beautiful and Coatl = Serpent (symbolic of knowledge)) which was a foundational component of the MAS curriculum. Second, is the documentary about TUSD’s MAS program of the same name (http://www.preciousknowledgefilm.com/).

  15. 15.

    This concept is outlined in Dr. Cintli’s presentation, “Outlaw Arizona,” which cites 9 international treaties that protect these rights.

References

  1. Aguirre, A. (2000). Academic storytelling: A critical race theory story of affirmative action. Sociological Perspectives, 43(2), 319–339.

  2. Arizona Republic. (2011, April 28). Who’s in charge at Tucson Unified? Arizona Republic. Arizona Republic: Phoenix, AZ. Online at: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2011/04/28/20110428thur1-28.html.

  3. Biggers, J. (2012, January 23). Tucson school walk out grow: Protest school district’s folly and Mexican American Studies. Huffington Post. Online at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-biggers/tucson-ethnic-studies_b_1224256.html.

  4. Cabrera, N. L. (2012). A state-mandated epistemology of ignorance: Arizona’s HB2281 and Mexican American/Raza Studies. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 9(2), 132–135.

  5. Cabrera, N. L., Mesa, E. L., & Rodriguez, R. (2011). The fight for ethnic studies in Tucson. North American Congress on Latin America’s Report on the Americas, 44(6), 20–24.

  6. Cabrera, N. L., Milem, J. F., & Marx, R. W. (2012). An empirical analysis of the effects of Mexican American Studies participation on student achievement within Tucson Unified School District. Tucson, AZ: Report to Special Master Dr. Willis D. Hawley on the Tucson Unified School District Desegregation Case.

  7. Delgado, R. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411–2441.

  8. Herreras, M. (2011, July 7). Violent message: A professor at the UA is threatened after people opposed to TUSD’s ethnic studies name him in a video. Tucson Weekly. Online at: http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/violent-messages/Content?oid=3081080.

  9. Horne, T. (2010). Findings by the state superintendent of public instruction of violation by Tucson Unified School District pursuant to A.R.S.§15-112(B). Retrieved June 1, 2012 from http://www.azag.gov/issues/TUSD%20%20Ethnic%20Studies%20Findings.pdf.

  10. Horne, T. (2012, June 22). Race-based studies can’t be justified. The Arizona Republic. Retrieved June 25, 2012 from http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2012/06/07/20120607race-based-studies-horne.html.

  11. Huicochea, A. (2012, January 24). Students walk out in ethnic-studies protest. Arizona Daily Star. Online at: http://azstarnet.com/news/local/education/precollegiate/students-walk-out-in-ethnic-studies-protest/article_a462c23c-0eb7-57b8-9ad1-486d634371ef.html.

  12. Huicochea, A. (2012, January 27). Students in walkout suspended. Arizona Daily Star. Online at: http://azstarnet.com/news/local/education/precollegiate/students-in-walkout-suspended/article_e63dcb6f-9954-5cd9-936a-0577e8ba7044.html.

  13. Huicochea, A. (2012, August 8). Mohave man given probation for death threats against University of Arizona prof. Arizona Daily Star. Online at: http://azstarnet.com/news/local/education/precollegiate/mohave-man-given-probation-for-death-threats-vs-ua-prof/article_67df77d2-2d4a-571f-af40-b415eea1ad0c.html.

  14. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.

  15. McHugh, K. (2011, May 5). YouTube video forces TUSD superintendent to call for delay vote. Social Times. Online at: http://socialtimes.com/youtube-video-forces-tusd-superintendent-to-call-for-delay-vote_b60917.

  16. O’Leary, A. O., Romero, A. J., Cabrera, N. L., & Rascon, M. (2012). Assault on ethnic studies. In O. Santa Anna & C. González de Bustamante (Eds.), Arizona firestorm: Global realities, national media and provincial politics (pp. 97–120). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  17. Otero, L. R., & Cammarota, J. (2011). Notes from the Ethnic Studies home front: Student protests, texting, and subtexts of oppression. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(5), 639–648.

  18. Pedicone, J. (2011, May 1). Adults used students as pawns in TUSD ethnic studies protest. Arizona Daily Star. Online at: http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/article_26542dfa-7d79-5682-85d5-7aaed9947ac8.html.

  19. Solorzano, D., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a Critical Race and LatCrit Theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308–342.

  20. Solorzano, D., & Yosso, T. (2001). Critical race and LatCrit theory and method: Counter storytelling Chicana and Chicano graduate school experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 471–495.

  21. Tucson Unified School District. (2012). Mexican American Studies resolution. Tucson, AZ: Author. Online at: http://www.tusd1.org/contents/govboard/Documents/ResolutionMAS011012.pdf.

  22. Villalpando, O. (2003). Self-segregation or self-preservation? A critical race theory and Latina/o critical theory analysis of a study of Chicana/o college students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 619–646.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Nolan L. Cabrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cabrera, N.L., Meza, E.L., Romero, A.J. et al. “If There is No Struggle, There is No Progress”: Transformative Youth Activism and the School of Ethnic Studies. Urban Rev 45, 7–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0220-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mexican American Studies
  • Ethnic Studies
  • Youth activism
  • Transformative resistance
  • Counternarrative
  • Tucson Unified School District