The Urban Review

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 358–378 | Cite as

An Effective Urban Summer School: Students’ Perspectives on Their Success

  • Leslie S. Keiler


This study describes and analyzes the experiences of four secondary students during an urban summer school program. In the previous summer, over 90% of program participants passed the state course-end exam, compared to the city Department of Education’s summer school pass rate of less than 36%. The study examines the ways in which different components of the program affected the students’ learning and attitudes. It contrasts the students’ descriptions of their past unsuccessful experiences with how they perceive the summer program. Student claims are contextualized by teacher comments and direct observations. Through analysis of multiple data sets, three themes emerge suggesting that what made the program effective was the inclusion of what students referred to as ‘fun’ learning activities, the focus on student understanding, and mutual respect among the participants and teachers. The critical finding of this study is that students who have failed and been failed in their urban schools can thrive when offered meaningful learning experiences by instructors who believe in their potential to succeed.


Academic achievement Secondary education Student-centered Student perceptions Summer school 


  1. Abbott, J., & Ryan, T. (1999). Constructing knowledge, reconstructing schooling. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 66–69.Google Scholar
  2. Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92.Google Scholar
  3. Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2006). Longitudinal achievement effects of multiyear summer school: Evidence from the Teach Baltimore randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Evaluation, 28(1), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracey, G. W. (2002). What students do in the summer. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(7), 497–498.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, J. H., & Keiler, L. S. (2009). Alternatively certified teachers in urban small schools: Where policy reform meets the road. Urban Review, 41, 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chmelynski, C. (1998). Summer school for meeting higher standards. The Education Digest, 63(9), 47–50.Google Scholar
  7. Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, H., Charton, K., Valentine, J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (2000). Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65, 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fifer, M. E., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Summer opportunity scholarships (SOS): A proposal to narrow the skills gap. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  10. Frost, P. (2005). The CTY summer school model: evolvement, adaptation and extrapolation at the national academy for gifted and talented youth (England). High Ability Studies, 16(1), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heron, A. H. (2003). A study of agency: Multiple constructions of choice and decision making in an inquiry-based summer school program for struggling readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(7), 568–579.Google Scholar
  12. Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (1994). Data management and analysis. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  14. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Listening to students’ voices on learning with information technologies in a rich technology-based classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34–37.Google Scholar
  17. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Miatra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neild, R. C., & Balfanz, R. (2006). AN extreme degree of difficulty: The educational demographics of urban neighborhood high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Opalinski, G., Ellers, S., & Goodman, A. (2004). I know what you did last summer. Principal Leadership (Middle School Ed), 4(6), 32–37.Google Scholar
  22. Pitts, S. E. (2004). Lessons in learning: Learning, teaching and motivation at a music summer school. Music Education Research, 6(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanders, M. (2004). Urban odyssey: Theatre of the oppressed and talented minority youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(2), 218–241.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, J. B., Lee, V. E., & Newmann, F. M. (2001). Instruction and achievement in Chicago elementary schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. [Online] Retrieved June 23, 2003, from
  25. Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Stone, S. I., Engel, M., Nagaoka, J., & Roderick, M. (2005). Getting it right the second time around: Student classroom experience in Chicago’s summer bridge program. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 935–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swatton, P. (1994). Pupils’ performance within the domain of data interpretation, with particular reference to pattern recognition. Research in Science & Technological Education, 12(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Toppo, G. (2006, June 20). Big-city schools struggle with graduation rates. USA Today. Accessed 20 Feb 2009.
  30. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York CollegeThe City University of New YorkJamaicaUSA

Personalised recommendations