The Urban Review

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 454–471 | Cite as

Narrating Neighborhood: Denying Young Women’s Public Voices About Violence



This paper describes a youth-centered activist project with a group of young women in Brooklyn, NY, and the controversy surrounding it. In 1999 the young women created a neighborhood mural with anti-violence themes. Within 6 months of the mural’s dedication, the mural was whitewashed by the corporate owner of the mural wall. Using content and discourse analysis of archival materials, organizational documents, and ethnographic fieldnotes from participant observation, I argue that the teen women’s representations of violence were denied through the shifting understandings of their ages and assumptions about conflict resolution strategies. I offer reflections on the need for careful planning and reflection in youth participatory projects and the meanings of success and social change in these projects.


Young women Moral community Space Violence Mural 


  1. Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. A., Fox, K. J., Gamson, J., Gartrell, N., Hurst, L., Hurzman, C., Salzinger, L., Schiffman, J., & Ui, S. (1991). Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burlet, S., & Reid, H. (1998). A gender uprising: Political representation and minority ethnic communities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Childress, H. (2004). Teenagers, territory, and the appropriation of space. Childhood, 11(2), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ferree, M. M., & Martin, P. Y. (Eds.). (1995). Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women’s movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fine, M., Roberts, R., & Torre, M.E., Bloom, J., Burns, A., Chajet, L., Guishard, M., & Payne, Y. (2004). Echoes of Brown: Youth documenting and performing the legacy of Brown. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, J. (1995). From seed to harvest: Transformations of feminist organizations and scholarship. In M. M. Ferree, & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women’s movement (pp. 397–408). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Giroux, H. A. (2003). Racial injustice and disposable youth in the age of zero tolerance. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(4), 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffin, C. (1993). Representations of youth. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Ingold, T. (1987). The appropriateness of nature. Ames, IA: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  15. Leadbeater, B. J. R., & Way, N. (1996). Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Leadbeater, B. J. R., & Way, N. (2007). Urban girls revisited: Building strengths. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McIntyre, A. (2000). Constructing meaning about violence, school, and community: Participatory action research with urban youth. The Urban Review, 32(2), 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral inclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Opotow, S. (1993). Animals and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 71–85.Google Scholar
  20. Pastor, J. (1993). Possible selves and academic achievement among inner-city students of color. Unpublished Master’s thesis. The Graduate Center-The City University of New York, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Pastor, J., McCormick, J., & Fine, M., with Andolsen, R., Friedman, N., Richardson, N., Roach, T., Tavarez, M. (1996). Makin’ homes: An urban girl thing. In B.J. Ross Leadbeater, & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 15–34). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Roman, L. G. (1996). Spectacle in the dark: Youth as transgression, display, and repression. Educational Theory, 46(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sananman, A. (2000). “We choose to express our combined voices through the international language of art”: Teen civic engagement & activism through community muralism. Unpublished research report.Google Scholar
  24. Sarason, S. B., Zitnaz, G., & Grossman, F. K. (1971). The creation of a community setting. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schehr, R. C., & Milovanovic, D. (1999). Conflict mediation and the postmodern: Chaos, catastrophe, and psychoanalytic semiotics. Social Justice, 26(1), 208–232.Google Scholar
  26. Silin, J. G. (1995). Sex, death, and the education of children: Our passion for ignorance in the age of AIDS. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherall, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 5–48). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Turner, V. (1967). Betwixt and between the liminal period in Rites de Passage. The forest of symbols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wilkinson, S. (2000). Women with breast cancer talking causes: Comparing content, biographical and discursive analyses. Feminism & Psychology, 10(4), 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentCollege of Community and Public Affairs, Binghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations