Advertisement

The clinical rate of antibiotic change following empiric treatment for suspected urinary tract infections

  • Jonathan Dokter
  • Lauren E. TennysonEmail author
  • Laura Nguyen
  • Esther Han
  • Larry T. Sirls
Urology - Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the rate of antibiotic change in an outpatient setting following empiric treatment of culture proven UTI and to identify risk factors associated with change.

Methods

Patients with suspected UTI and urine culture were reviewed (January 2016–June 2016). Those with a positive culture were categorized by whether or not they were treated empirically. Empiric treatment was evaluated for associations with clinical–demographic data, symptoms and urinalysis (UA). Antibiotic change was evaluated with clinical–demographic data, urine culture, and resistance patterns.

Results

916 urine cultures (636 patients) were included. 391 (43%) cultures were positive, and 164 (42%) were treated empirically. Clinical–demographic data did not differ between groups. Those treated empirically had more documented UTI symptoms (93 vs 58%, P < 0.001), and UA abnormalities including positive nitrites (51 vs 29%, P < 0.001), 3 + leukocyte esterase (27 vs 19%, P = 0.002) and 3 + blood (13 vs 4%, P = 0.005). Of those treated empirically, 42/164 (26%) required an antibiotic change, and this was associated with immunosuppression (12 vs 2%, P = 0.027) resistance to > 3 antibiotics (33 vs 20%, P = 0.039) and also resistance to fluoroquinolone (50 vs 30%, P = 0.016), monobactam (19 vs 7% P = 0.042) and TMP–SMX (52 vs 19%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Almost one-quarter of patients treated empirically required antibiotic change. This was driven largely by bacterial resistance. New technologies allowing rapid bacterial identification and sensitivity may improve patient care.

Keywords

Urinary tract infection Antibiotics Antimicrobial resistance Empiric treatment 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    CDC (2013) Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Current vol 114. Doi: CS239559-B, p 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cortes-Penfield NW, Trautner BW, Jump RLP (2017) Urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria in older adults. Infect Dis Clin N Am 31(4):673–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2017.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kobayashi M, Shapiro DJ, Hersh AL, Sanchez GV, Hicks LA (2016) Outpatient antibiotic prescribing practices for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women in the United States, 2002–2011. Open Forum Infect Dis 3(3):ofw159.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw159 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holm A, Cordoba G, Møller Sørensen T et al (2017) Effect of point-of-care susceptibility testing in general practice on appropriate prescription of antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a diagnostic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 7(10):e018028.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018028 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Urological Association (2010) National Urology Research AgendaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levy SB, Bonnie M (2004) Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med 10(12S):S122–S129.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1145 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization (2015) Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. WHO Press, Geneva. pp 1–28. Doi: ISBN 978 92 4 150976 3Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shimoni Z, Avdiaev R, Froom P (2017) Urine cultures in hospitalized geriatric patients presenting with fever. Am J Med Sci 353(1):17–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2016.11.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goossens H, Ferech M, Vander Stichele R, Elseviers M (2005) Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study. Lancet 365(9459):579–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17907-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milan PB, Ivan IM (2009) Catheter-associated and nosocomial urinary tract infections: antibiotic resistance and influence on commonly used antimicrobial therapy. Int Urol Nephrol 41(3):461–464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9468-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poon E, Self L, McLeod SL, Caine S, Borgundvaag B (2017) Uncomplicated urinary tract infections in the emergency department: a review of local practice patterns. CJEM.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2017.39 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davenport M, Mach KE, Shortliffe LMD, Banaei N, Wang T-H, Liao JC (2017) New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol 14:296.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.20 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giesen LGM, Cousins G, Dimitrov BD, van de Laar FA, Fahey T (2010) Predicting acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs. BMC Fam Pract 11(1):78.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-78 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Croxall G, Weston V, Joseph S, Manning G, Cheetham P, McNally A (2011) Increased human pathogenic potential of Escherichia coli from polymicrobial urinary tract infections in comparison to isolates from monomicrobial culture samples. J Med Microbiol 60:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Dokter
    • 2
  • Lauren E. Tennyson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laura Nguyen
    • 3
  • Esther Han
    • 1
  • Larry T. Sirls
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive SurgeryBeaumont HealthRoyal OakUSA
  2. 2.Oakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of UrologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations