Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 49, Issue 12, pp 2099–2104 | Cite as

Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplasty reduces the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis for proximal hypospadias: a report of 63 cases

  • Hamid Arshadi
  • Shabnam Sabetkish
  • Abdol-Mohammad KajbafzadehEmail author
Urology - Original Paper
  • 233 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To report the feasibility of modified tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty technique for proximal hypospadias in 63 cases.

Methods

From January 2004 to March 2010, 63 patients underwent one-stage TIP urethroplasty (modified Snodgrass technique repair) using 2–3 of three covering layers (corpus spongiosum, dartos, and tunica vaginalis). The primary meatus was proximal penile, penoscrotal, scrotal, and perineal in 38, 13, 10, and 2 patients, respectively. All patients had chordee that was corrected with dorsal plication. Glanuloplasty was performed in all cases. Complications and cosmetic results were documented after 6–72 months of follow-up.

Results

A total of 63 boys with proximal hypospadias underwent Snodgrass hypospadias repair at a mean age of 8.5 months (range 6–54). Mean operative time was 210 ± 35 min. Patients were followed up with 6-month intervals for up to 6 years postoperatively. After 6 years of follow-up, nine urethrocutaneous fistulae, four bleeding, four meatal stenoses, and one urethral stricture were reported. Cosmetic result was satisfactory according to parent’s opinion and another surgeon. No residual chordee was observed in any cases (without artificial correction).

Conclusion

In conclusion, this preliminary report can be estimated as an alternative technique with acceptable complication and cosmetic results for proximal hypospadias correction.

Keywords

Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty Proximal hypospadias Fistula Meatal stenosis Complication Cosmetic 

Abbreviation

TIP

Modified tubularized incised plate

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 9383 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 7934 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 3606 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Aulagne M, Harper L, de Napoli-Cocci S, Bondonny J, Dobremez E (2010) Long-term outcome of severe hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 6(5):469–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Snodgrass WT (2011) Hypospadias. Pediatr Urol 177–190Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snodgrass W, Elmore J (2004) Initial experience with staged buccal graft (Bracka) hypospadias reoperations. J Urol 172(4):1720–1724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghanem MA, Nijman RJM (2010) Outcome analysis of tubularized incised urethral plate using dorsal dartos flap for proximal penile hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol 6(5):477–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Snodgrass WT (1999) Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: indications, technique, and complications. Urology 54(1):6–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng D-C, Yao H-J, Cai Z-K et al (2015) Two-stage urethroplasty is a better choice for proximal hypospadias with severe chordee after urethral plate transection: a single-center experience. Asian J Androl 17(1):94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng EY, Vemulapalli SN, Kropp BP et al (2002) Snodgrass hypospadias repair with vascularized dartos flap: the perfect repair for virgin cases of hypospadias? J Urol 168(4):1723–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Springer A, Krois W, Horcher E (2011) Trends in hypospadias surgery: results of a worldwide survey. Eur Urol 60(6):1184–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G (2004) Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom? BJU Int 94(8):1188–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shanberg A, Sanderson K, Duel B (2001) Re-operative hypospadias repair using the Snodgrass incised plate urethroplasty. BJU Int 87(6):544–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S et al (2007) Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty. J Urol 178(6):2571–2575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mureau MAM, Slijper FME, Slob AK, Verhulst FC, Nijman RJM (1996) Satisfaction with penile appearance after hypospadias surgery: the patient and surgeon view. J Urol 155(2):703–706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marrocco G, Vallasciani S, Fiocca G, Calisti A (2004) Hypospadias surgery: a 10-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 20(3):200–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snodgrass W, Villanueva C, Bush NC (2014) Duration of follow-up to diagnose hypospadias urethroplasty complications. J Pediatr Urol. 10(2):208–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jayanthi VR (2003) The modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair: reducing the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis. J Urol 170(4):1603–1605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sozubir S, Snodgrass W (2003) A new algorithm for primary hypospadias repair based on tip urethroplasty. J Pediatr Surg 38(8):1157–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filinte GT, Akan M, Temiz G, Aycicek Cardak GN, Gonullu E (2014) Applications of triangular glanular flap in hypospadias repairs for different purposes. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(1):34–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lacy JM, Hendrix LN, Grant C, Ziada AM (2014) Distal hypospadias repair using only glans wing mobilization and approximation. Can J Urol 21(2):7241–7245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amilal B, Arup M (2008) Acute postoperative complications of hypospadias repair. Indian J Urol 24:241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gargollo PC, Cai AW, Borer JG, Retik AB (2011) Management of recurrent urethral strictures after hypospadias repair: Is there a role for repeat dilation or endoscopic incision? J Pediatr Urol 7(1):34–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Snodgrass WT, Nguyen MT (2002) Current technique of tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Urology 60(1):157–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G, Hurwitz R, Caldamone A, Ehrlich R (1998) Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair for proximal hypospadias. J Urol 159(6):2129–2131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G, Hurwitz R, Caldamone A, Ehrlich R (1996) Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: results of a multicenter experience. J Urol 156(2):839–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Snodgrass WT (2001) Re: effect of the depth and width of the urethral plate on tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol 166(2):633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Snodgrass W, Lorenzo A (2002) Tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJU Int 89(1):90–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen S, Yang S, Hsieh C, Chen Y (2001) Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJU Int 86(9):1050–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Snodgrass W, Cost N, Nakonezny PA, Bush N (2011) Analysis of risk factors for glans dehiscence after tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. J Urol 185(5):1845–1851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kajbafzadeh A-M, Arshadi H, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, Najjaran-Tousi V, Sahebpor ARA (2007) Proximal hypospadias with severe chordee: single stage repair using corporeal tunica vaginalis free graft. J Urol 178(3):1036–1042CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lorenzo A, Snodgrass W (2002) Regular dilatation is unnecessary after tubularized incised-plate hypospadias repair. BJU Int 89(1):94–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kajbafzadeh A-M, Sabetkish S, Mahboubi AH, Sabetkish N (2014) Single incisional approach for reconstruction of hypospadias and concomitant inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Urol 10(1):45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamataka A, Kobayashi H, Okada Y, Tsukamoto K, Lane GJ, Miyano T (2003) A novel technique for reinforcing the neourethra in hypospadias associated with bilateral undescended testis: use of the gubernaculum. J Pediatr Surg 38(12):1799–1801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Snodgrass W, Yucel S (2007) Tubularized incised plate for mid shaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol 177(2):698–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cendron M, Ellsworth PI (1999) Treatment of complex hypospadias by the Snodgrass technique. Ann Urol 33(5):364–367Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu N, Xue X-Y, Li X-D et al (2014) Comparative outcomes of the tubularized incised plate and transverse island flap onlay techniques for the repair of proximal hypospadias. Int Urol Nephrol 46(3):487–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid Arshadi
    • 1
  • Shabnam Sabetkish
    • 1
  • Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Therapy, Children’s Hospital Medical CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations