International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 48, Issue 11, pp 1817–1821 | Cite as

Renal functional outcomes after robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy: the National Cancer Institute experience with robotic partial nephrectomy for 3 or more tumors in a single kidney

  • Ryan A. Hankins
  • Annerleim Walton-Diaz
  • Hong Truong
  • Joanna Shih
  • Gennady Bratslavsky
  • Peter A. Pinto
  • W. Marston Linehan
  • Adam R. Metwalli
Urology - Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

To identify renal function outcomes after robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy (RMxPNx), we reviewed our institutional database at the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. To our knowledge, we present the largest series of RMxPNx renal function outcomes to date. Robotic partial nephrectomy has been employed for oncologic control and to prevent dialysis dependence in hereditary multifocal renal cell carcinoma conditions. We have termed robotic surgery on a single kidney with three or more lesions a RMxPNx.

Materials and methods

We evaluated patients from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution (NIH/NCI) that underwent RMxPNx from 2007 to 2013. Demographic and operative data were compiled with statistical analysis with T test performed to determine renal function outcomes.

Results

A total of 54 patients underwent RMxPNx. Mean number of tumors removed was 8.63 (range 3–52). Mean preoperative creatinine and eGFR were 1.02 ± 0.26 mg/dL and 85.4 ± 21.5 mL/min, respectively. Postoperatively, creatinine increased from baseline by 0.45 mg/dL (p < 0.001). Similarly, a mean decrease in eGFR by 24.6 mL/min was observed (p < 0.001). At 3-month follow-up, the creatinine increase from baseline was 0.05 mg/dL (p = 0.10) and mean decrease in eGFR was 3.01 mL/min (p = 0.21). When stratifying based on preoperative CKD stages I–III, similar results were observed.

Conclusion

Robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible approach to patients with multifocal renal masses. These complex surgeries have a demonstrated learning curve, but this minimally invasive approach for nephron-sparing surgery allows patients to preserve renal function where they would otherwise require open surgery or a radical nephrectomy.

Keywords

Kidney cancer Partial nephrectomy Robotic surgery Multiplex partial nephrectomy Multifocal renal tumors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, and supported by Grant Nos. ZIA1BC011028-05, ZIA BC011038-05, ZIA BC011043-05, ZID BC011089-05 and ZIE BC 011023-05 from the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance and ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

Human and animal rights

No animals participated in this study. All human patients involved in urologic care at the NIH consented to the use of the information obtained in this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, Linehan WM, Pinto PA (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 53:514–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boris R, Proano M, Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Bratslavsky G (2009) Initial experience with robot assisted partial nephrectomy for multiple renal masses. J Urol 182:1280–1286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herring JC, Enquist EG, Chernoff A, Linehan WM, Choyke PL, Walther MM (2001) Parenchymal sparing surgery in patients with hereditary renal cell carcinoma: 10-year experience. J Urol 165:777–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drachenberg DE, Mena OJ, Choyke PL, Linehan WM, Walther MM (2004) Parenchymal sparing surgery for central renal tumors in patients with hereditary renal cancers. J Urol 172:49–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liangkuan B, Zhang C, Li K, Fan X, Xu K, Han J, Huang H, Liu H, Dong W, Yang X, Huang J, Lin T (2013) Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plus One 8:1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers CG, Metwalli A, Blatt AM, Bratslavsky G, Menon M, Linehan WM, Pinto PA (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 180:2353–2356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gong Y, Du C, Josephson DY, Wilson TG, Nelson R (2010) Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 28:111–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borghesi M, Schiavina R, Gan M, Novara G, Mottrie A, Ficarra V (2013) Expanding utilization of robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b and complex T1a renal masses. World J Urol 31:499–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber G, Dulabon L, Bhayani S, Stifelman M, Kaouk J, Rogers C (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors > 4 cm versus < 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 26:642–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Sammon JD, Rogers CG, Trinh Q, Menon M (2013) Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol 191:1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metwalli AR, Linehan WM (2014) Nephron-sparing surgery for multifocal and hereditary renal tumors. Curr Opin Urol 24(5):466–473CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fadahunsi AT, Sanford T, Linehan WM et al (2011) Feasibility and outcomes of partial nephrectomy for resection of at least 20 tumors in a single renal unit. J Urol 185:49–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, Weight CJ, Larson BT, Gill IS, Novick AC (2008) Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 180:2363–2369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Fergany A, Frank I, Gill IS, Blute ML, Campbell SC (2011) Renal function after partial nephrectomy: effect of warm ischemia relative to quantity and quality of preserved kidney. J Urol 79:356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duffey BG, Choyke PL, Glenn G, Grubb RL, Venzon D, Linehan WM, Walther MM (2004) The relationship between renal tumor size and metastases in patients with von hippel-lindau disease. J Urol 172:63–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan A. Hankins
    • 1
  • Annerleim Walton-Diaz
    • 1
  • Hong Truong
    • 1
  • Joanna Shih
    • 1
  • Gennady Bratslavsky
    • 1
  • Peter A. Pinto
    • 1
  • W. Marston Linehan
    • 1
  • Adam R. Metwalli
    • 1
  1. 1.Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations