Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 47, Issue 12, pp 2013–2021 | Cite as

Testing measurement equivalence of the SF-36 questionnaire across patients on hemodialysis and healthy people

  • Zahra Bagheri
  • Peyman JafariEmail author
  • Marjan Faghih
  • Elahe Allahyari
  • Tania Dehesh
Nephrology - Original article

Abstract

Background

Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when members from different groups respond differently to particular items in a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire after controlling for underlying HRQoL construct. This study aimed to assess DIF in the SF-36 questionnaire and its effect on comparing HRQoL scores across patients on HD and healthy people.

Methods

One hundred fifty patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 642 healthy individuals filled out the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire. Multiple-group multiple-indicator multiple-causes (MG-MIMIC) model was used to assess DIF across patients on HD and healthy population.

Results

Sixteen out of 36 (44.4 %) items were flagged with DIF. Six out of 16 items (37.5 %) were flagged with uniform DIF, nine items (56.2 %) with non-uniform DIF, and one item (6.2 %) with both uniform DIF and non-uniform DIF. DIF items were associated with all subscales with the exception of the limitation due to physical problems and bodily pain subscales. The significant lower HRQoL scores of patients on HD in comparison with healthy people in the physical functioning and vitality subscales did not change after removing the items with uniform DIF.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that patients on HD and healthy people perceived the meaning of the items in SF-36 questionnaire differently. Although the impact of DIF is minimal, the cross-group comparison across patients on HD and healthy people should be performed with caution.

Keywords

Quality of life Patients on hemodialysis Healthy population Differential item functioning SF-36 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr Nasrin Shokrpour, Mr Hosain Argasi, and Mr Amin Borhani for English editing of this paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

This work was supported by the Grant Number 89-5299 from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Research Council. This article was extracted from a scientific project conducted by a PhD student, Marjan Faghih. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to enrollment in the study. The study was approved by the ethical committee of our institution, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and it was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Khakurel S, Agrawal RK, Hada R (2009) Pattern of end stage renal disease in a tertiary care center. J Nepal Med Assoc 48:126–130Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinkle JL, Cheever KH (2014) The 13th edition of Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hinoshita F, Ando R, Sakai R, Kuriyama S (2014) Hemodialysis-associated problems to solve: current and future. Sci World J 2014:382170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wasserfallen JB, Halabi G, Saudan P (2004) Quality of life on chronic dialysis: comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 19:1594–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kusleikaite NBI, Kuzminskis V, Vaiciuniene R (2010) The association between health-related quality of life and mortality among hemodialysis patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 46:531–537Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noshad H, Sadreddini S, Nezami N, Salekzamani Y, Ardalan MR (2009) Comparison of outcome and quality of life: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients. Singap Med J 50:185–192Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pakpour AH, Saffari M, Yekaninejad MS, Panahi D, Harrison AP, Molsted S (2010) Health-related quality of life in a sample of Iranian patients on hemodialysis. Iran J Kidney Dis 4:50–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E, Maesaka JK, Fishbane S (2001) Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl 16:1387–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Briley LP, Sloane RJ, Pieper CF, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA (2008) Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. Kidney Int 74:930–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kimmel PL, Patel SS (2006) Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: focus on end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Semin Nephrol 26:68–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Goodkin DA, Fukuhara S, Mapes DL, Young EW et al (2007) Factors associated with health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients in the DOPPS. Qual Life Res 16:545–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F et al (2003) Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). Kidney Int 64:339–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marquis P, Trudeau E (2001) Quality of life and patient satisfaction: two important aspects in asthma therapy. Curr Opin Pulm Med 7:S18–S20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Guo A, Mujais S, Mexican Nephrology Collaborative Study Group (2005) Health-related quality of life predicts outcomes but is not affected by peritoneal clearance: the ADEMEX trial. Kidney Int 67:1093–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mujais SK, Story K, Brouillette J, Takano T, Soroka S, Franek C et al (2009) Health-related quality of life in CKD Patients: correlates and evolution over time. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1293–1301PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsay SL, Healstead M (2002) Self-care self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life among patients receiving hemodialysis in Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud 39:245–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Finkelstein FO, Finkelstein SH (2000) Depression in chronic dialysis patients: assessment and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transpl 15:1911–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rayyani M, Malekyan L, Azzizadeh Forouzi M, Razban F (2014) Self-care self-efficacy and quality of life among patients receiving hemodialysis in South-East of Iran. Asian J Nurs Educ Res 4:165–171Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmermann PR, Poli de Figueiredo CE, Fonseca NA (2001) Depression, anxiety and adjustment in renal replacement therapy: a quality of life assessment. Clin Nephrol 56:387–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blake C, Codd MB, Cassidy A, O’Meara YM (2000) Physical function, employment and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol 13:142–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johansen KL, Shubert T, Doyle J, Soher B, Sakkas GK, Kent-Braun JA (2003) Muscle atrophy in patients receiving hemodialysis: effects on muscle strength, muscle quality, and physical function. Kidney Int 63:291–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Alleyne S, Cruz I, Veis JH (1998) Psychosocial factors, behavioral compliance and survival in urban hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 54:245–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Physical functioning and health-related quality-of-life changes with exercise training in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:482–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Low-functioning hemodialysis patients improve with exercise training. Am J Kidney Dis 36:600–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tawney KW, Tawney PJ, Kovach J (2003) Disablement and rehabilitation in end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial 16:447–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen M, Ku N (1998) Factors associated with quality of life among patients on hemodialysis. Nurs Res 6:393–404Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Teresi JA, Fleishman JA (2007) Differential item functioning and health assessment. Qual Life Res 16:33–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3:4–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim ES, Yoon M (2011) Testing measurement invariance: a comparison of multiple-group categorical CFA and IRT. Struct Equ Model 18:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Curtin RB, Lowrie EG, DeOreo PB (1999) Self-reported functional status: an important predictor of health outcomes among end-stage renal disease patients. Adv Ren Replace Ther 6:133–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diaz-Buxo JA, Lowrie EG, Lew NL, Zhang H, Lazarus JM (2000) Quality-of-life evaluation using Short Form 36: comparison in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:293–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 306:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH (2000) Association among SF-36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalisation, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:2797–2806Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31:247–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pollard B, Johnston M, Dixon D (2013) Exploring differential item functioning in the SF-36 by demographic, clinical, psychological and social factors in an osteoarthritis population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:346PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement (2010) Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:570–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dallmeijer AJ, de Groot V, Roorda LD, Schepers VP, Lindeman E, van den Berg LH et al (2007) Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a study using Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med 39:163–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taylor WJ, McPherson KM (2007) Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 57:723–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bjorner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech P (1998) Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1189–1202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Perkins AJ, Stump TE, Monahan PO, McHorney CA (2006) Assessment of differential item functioning for demographic comparisons in the MOS SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 15:331–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yu YF, Yu AP, Ahn J (2007) Investigating differential item functioning by chronic diseases in the SF-36 health survey: a latent trait analysis using MIMIC models. Med Care 45:851–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dehesh T, Zare N, Jafari P, Sagheb MM (2014) Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the Ferrans and Powers 3.0 index in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 46:1183–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Woods CM (2009) Evaluation of MIMIC-model methods for DIF testing with comparison to two-group analysis. Multivar Behav Res 44:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jafari H, Lahsaeizadeh S, Jafari P, Karimi M (2008) Quality of life in thalassemia major: reliability and validity of the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire. J Postgrad Med 54:273–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B (2005) The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 14:875–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jones RN (2006) Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination: detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling. Med Care 44:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Traebert J, Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Locker D (2010) Differential item functioning related to ethnicity in an oral health-related quality of life measure. Int J Paediatr Dent 20:435–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Traebert J, de Lacerda JT, Thomson WM, Page LF, Locker D (2010) Differential item functioning in a Brazilian–Portuguese version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 38:129–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Huang IC, Leite WL, Shearer P, Seid M, Revicki DA, Shenkman EA (2011) Differential item functioning in quality of life measure between children with and without special health-care needs. Value Health 14:872–883PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abdelbasit A, Katherine N, PamelaW Kamal HH (2014) Comparing health-related quality of life between haemodialysis patients and a community sample in the United Arab Emirates. Ren Soc Australas J 10:34–43Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sathvik BS, Parthasarathi G, Narahari MG, Gurudev KC (2008) An assessment of the quality of life in hemodialysis patients using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Indian J Nephrol 18:141–149PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cotârlă L (2009) Possibilities of increasing the quality of life of renal patients, chronically dialyzed. Dissertation. Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Parker KP, Kutner NG, Bliwise DL, Bailey JL, Rye DB (2003) Nocturnal sleep, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life in stable patients on hemodialysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:68PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Crane PK, Hart DL, Gibbons LE, Cook KF (2006) A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning. J Clin Epidemiol 59:478–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jafari P, Stevanovic D, Bagheri Z (2015) Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the KINDL questionnaire for quality of life assessment in children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. doi: 10.1007/s10578-015-0568-5
  58. 58.
    Jafari P, Allahyari E, Salarzadeh M, Bagheri Z (2015) Item-level informant discrepancies across obese-overweight children and their parents on the PedsQL™ 4.0 instrument: an iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression. Qual Life Res. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1046-z
  59. 59.
    Wyse AE (2013) DIF cancellation in the Rasch Model. J Appl Meas 14:118–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dimitrov DM (2008) Quantitative research in education. Intermediate and advanced methods. Whittier Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Teresi JA (2006) Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Med Care 44:152–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ (1990) Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. J Educ Meas 27:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fukuhara S, Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Kurokawa K, Mapes DL, Akizawa T (2003) Health-related quality of life among dialysis patients on three continents: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Kidney Int 64:1903–1910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Acaray A, Pinar R (2005) Quality of life in Turkish haemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 37:595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Borowiak E, Braksator E, Nowicki M, Kostka T (2009) Quality of life of chronic hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Med Sci Tech 50:RA37–RA42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zahra Bagheri
    • 1
  • Peyman Jafari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marjan Faghih
    • 1
  • Elahe Allahyari
    • 1
  • Tania Dehesh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiostatisticsShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran

Personalised recommendations