Comparison of various scoring methods for the diagnosis of protein–energy wasting in hemodialysis patients
The present study was designed to determine the cutoff points for the diagnosis of mild-to-moderate and severe protein–energy wasting (PEW) based on dialysis malnutrition score (DMS) and malnutrition inflammation score (MIS), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) of DMS and MIS in comparison with subjective global assessment (SGA) in hemodialysis (HD) patients.
In this study, 291 HD patients were randomly selected from among 2,302 adult HD patients in Tehran hemodialysis centers. The PEW in these patients was determined by SGA, DMS and MIS.
According to the cutoff points derived from the area under ROC curves, scores of 7–13 for DMS represented normal status or without PEW; 14–23, mild-to-moderate PEW; and 24–35, severe PEW. For MIS, scores of 0–7 represented normal status or without PEW; 8–18, mild-to-moderate PEW; and 19–30, severe PEW. In comparison with SGA, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under ROC curve, PPV, NPV, LR+ and LR− of DMS were 94 %, 88 %, 92 %, 97 %, 93 %, 92 %, 7.8 and 0.07, respectively. Those of MIS were 87 %, 96 %, 91 %, 97 %, 97 %, 83 %, 22.0 and 0.13 in comparison with SGA, respectively.
The results of the present study indicate that the DMS and MIS are almost similar to SGA for identifying PEW in HD patients, but it seems that the DMS is a more appropriate alternative tool for SGA in hospital routine assessments.
KeywordsProtein–energy wasting Hemodialysis Subjective global assessment Dialysis malnutrition score Malnutrition inflammation score
- 5.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD (2004) Malnutrition as a risk factor of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. In: Kopple JD, Massry SG (eds) Kopple and Massry’s nutritional management of renal disease, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 183–198Google Scholar
- 7.Mehrotra R, Kopple JD (2004) Causes of protein–energy malnutrition in chronic renal failure. In: Kopple JD, Massry SG (eds) Kopple and Massry’s nutritional management of renal disease, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 168–182Google Scholar
- 14.Hull A (2004) Renal Nutrition, 5th edn. Nutrition Dimension, AshlandGoogle Scholar
- 18.McCann L (2005) Pocket guide to nutrition assessment of the patient with chronic kidney disease, 3rd edn. National Kidney Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.Burleigh KS (2001) Associations among plasma homocysteine, amino acids and nutritional status in hemodialysis patients [dissertation]. University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 21.Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Kjellstrom T (1993) Basic epidemiology. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 22.Daugirdas JT, Stone JCV (2001) Physiologic principles and urea kinetic modeling. In: Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS (eds) Handbook of dialysis, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 15–45Google Scholar
- 24.Tapiawala S, Vora H, Patel Z, Badve S, Shah B (2006) Subjective global assessment of nutritional status of patients with chronic renal insufficiency and end stage renal disease on dialysis. J Assoc Physician India 54:923–926Google Scholar
- 26.Afshar R, Sanavi S, Izadi-Khah A (2007) Assessment of nutritional status in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a single-center study from Iran. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 18:397–404Google Scholar
- 27.Jahromi SR, Hosseini S, Razeghi E, Ap M, Sadrzadeh H (2010) Malnutrition predicting factors in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 21:846–851Google Scholar