The role of duloxetine in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This systematic review determined whether the duloxetine can get more benefits versus placebo in managing women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) all over the world.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing duloxetine with placebo in these patients. The eligible RCTs were identified from the following electronic databases: Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline and EMBASE. We treated the incontinence episode frequency (IEF) as the main outcome, and the secondary outcomes were cured, average voiding interval, incontinence quality of life (I-QOL), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuation.
The review contained ten trials including 5,738 women who were randomized to take duloxetine or placebo. All arms in individual trials were comparable for various baseline characteristics. Individual studies showed a significantly greater decrease in IEF than placebo group. The total IEF responders (defined as a woman who had at least a 50 % decrease in IEF with treatment) within the duloxetine-treated women were more than the placebo-treated women (52.5 vs. 33.7 %; RR = 1.56; 95 %CI, 1.46–1.66; p < 0.00001). TEAEs were commonly experienced by both two groups (62.7 vs. 45.3 %) though they were not critical.
Our meta-analysis showed that significant efficacy can be found in women treated with a certain dose of duloxetine. The adverse events like nausea, constipation, dry mouth, fatigue etc. are common.
KeywordsStress urinary incontinence Duloxetine Medical management Systematic review Meta-analysis
Stress urinary incontinence
Pelvic floor muscle training
Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor
Incontinence episode frequency
Incontinence quality of life
Treatment-emergent adverse events
- 2.Buckley BS, Lapitan MC, Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris (2008) Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men, women, and children: current evidence-findings of the fourth international consultation on incontinence. Urology 2010(76):265–270Google Scholar
- 3.Imamura M, Abrams P, Bain C, et al. (2010) Systematic review and economic modeling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess 14:No.40Google Scholar
- 4.Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (2005) International consultation on incontinence, 3rd edn. Health Publication Ltd, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lin AT, Sun MJ, Tai HL, et al. (2008) Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Urology 8:2 (25 January 2008)Google Scholar
- 13.Higgins J, Green S (2005) editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]. In the Cochrane Library, Issue 3, Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mariappan P, Alhasso AA, Grant A et al (2009) Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) for stress urinary incontinence in adults (Review). Cochrane Lib 1:1–56Google Scholar
- 19.Ho CP, Bhatia NN (2012) Development of stem cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24(5):311–317Google Scholar
- 25.Itano N, Berman C, Rodriguez LV et al (2003) Polypropylene sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: intermediate-term results. J Urol 169S:270Google Scholar