International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 1375–1382

Evaluation of acridine orange florescence in exfoliative urinary cytology for diagnosing bladder carcinoma

  • Ranlu Liu
  • Zhentao Tian
  • Jin Wang
  • Zhihong Zhang
  • Yong Xu
Urology - Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

This study reviewed acridine orange fluorescence (AO-F) in exfoliative urinary cytology results of 1,016 inpatients with urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder and 804 outpatients to investigate the value of AO-F in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Methods

A total of 1,016 bladder cancer inpatients from October 1995 to October 2005 and 804 outpatients from January 2004 to January 2006 were enrolled in this study. Each patient provided the morning urine specimen of 30–50 ml in a sterile container. Urine sediments were stained by acridine orange and observed with a fluorescence microscope; 60 bladder cancer inpatients from January 2006 to July 2007 were also chosen for the control study of three different detection methods, including AO-F, hematoxylin and eosin and Feulgen staining.

Results

Of the 1,016 bladder carcinoma samples analyzed, 793 were AO-F positive. Total positive rate of AO-F was 78.05 %. The positive rate was 74.69 % (611/818) for non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma and 91.91 % (182/198) for muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. A significant correlation of AO-F positivity with clinical stage was observed (P < 0.01). The positive rates among various pathological grades were 66.7 % (32/48) for G1, 67.5 % (319/474) for G2 and 90.4 % (413/457) for G3 with significant differences (P < 0.01). For the 804 outpatients, the sensitivity and specificity of bladder carcinoma were 77.11 and 85.29 %, respectively.

Conclusions

With its high sensitivity and specificity, AO-F is superior to other detection methods for bladder carcinoma detection. In addition, it is familiar, non-invasive, quick, cheap and easily repeatable.

Keywords

Bladder carcinoma Exfoliative urine cytology Acridine orange fluorescence Positive rate 

References

  1. 1.
    Brown FX (2000) Urine cytology. It is still the gold standard for screening? Urol Clin North Am 27:25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guitierrez BJL, Del HRRM, Antolin JFM et al (2001) Usefulness of the BTA State test for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. J Urol 57:685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zippe C, Pandrangi L, Potts JM et al (1999) NMP22: a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer. J Urol 161:62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ho SM, Cheng RY (2004) A promising bladder cancer detection assay the HA-HAase test. J Urol 172:1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shariat SF, Casella R, Khoddami SM et al (2004) Urine detection of survivin is a sensitive marker for the noninvasive diagnosis of bladder cancer. J Urol 171:626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett A (2008) Telomerase and other novel approaches to bladder cancer detection. Clin Lab Sci 21:185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Rhijn BW, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH (2005) Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: a systematic review. Eur Urol 47:736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liou LS (2006) Urothelial cancer biomarkers for detection and surveillance. Urology 67:25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Priolo G, Gontero P, Martinasso G et al (2001) Bladder tumor antigen assay as compared to voided urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. Clin Chim Acta 305:47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Konety BR (2006) Molecular markers in bladder cancer: a critical appraisal. Urol Oncol 24:326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papanicolaou CN, Marsshall VF (1945) Urine sediment smears: a diagnostic procedure in cancer of the urinary tract. Science 101:519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sneed P, Modermott MW, Gutin P et al (1997) Interstitial brachytherapy procedures for brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 13:157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cambier MA, Christy WJ, Wheeless LL Jr et al (1976) Slit-scan cytofluorometry. Basis for automated prescreening of urinary tract cytology. J Histochem Cytochem 24:305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melamed MR, Traganos F, Sharpless T et al (1976) Urinary cytology automation. Preliminary studies with acridine orange stain and flow-through cytofluorometry. Invest Urol 13:331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martinez-Piñeiro JA, Muntanola P, Martin MG et al (1977) Fluorescence urinary cytology in bladder cancer. Euro Urol 3:142Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hemstreet GP 3rd, West SS, Weems WL et al (1983) Quantitative fluorescence measurements of AO-stained normal and malignant bladder cells. Int J Cancer 31(5):577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collste LG, Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F et al (1980) Flow cytometry in bladder cancer detection and evaluation using acridine orange metachromatic nucleic acid staining of irrigation cytology specimens. J Urol 123:478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Têtu B, Katz RL, Kalter SP et al (1987) Acridine-orange flow cytometry of urinary bladder washings for the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. The influence of prior local therapy. Cancer 60:1815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zein TA, Milad MF (1991) Urine cytology in bladder tumor. Int Surg 76:52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andersen OP, Ladefoged C, Rohl HF et al (1989) Urine cytology as a supplement to cystoscopy and biopsy in the control of bladder tumor. Ugeskr Laeger 151:3400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raab SS, Lenel JC, Cohen MB (1994) Low grade transitional cell carcinoma: cytologic diagnosis by key features as identified by logistic regression analysis. Cancer 74:1621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Misra V, Gupta SC, Tandon SP et al (2000) Cytohistological study of urinary bladder neoplasms. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 43:303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lokeshwar VB, Soloway MS (2001) Current bladder tumor tests: does their prolonged utility fulfill clinical necessity? J Urol 165:1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Sukhun S, Hussain M (2003) Molecular biology of TCC. Crit Rev Oncol Haematol 47:181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ranlu Liu
    • 1
  • Zhentao Tian
    • 1
  • Jin Wang
    • 1
  • Zhihong Zhang
    • 1
  • Yong Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjin Institute of UrologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations