International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 955–960 | Cite as

Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on benign prostate hyperplasia

  • Xenophon K. Giannakopoulos
  • Christos Giotis
  • Spyridon Ch. Karkabounas
  • Ioannis I. Verginadis
  • Yannis V. Simos
  • Dimitrios Peschos
  • Angelos M. Evangelou
Urology – Original Paper

Abstract

Introduction

Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) has been treated with various types of electromagnetic radiation methods such as transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), interstitial laser therapy (ILC), holmium laser resection (HoLRP). In the present study, the effects of a noninvasive method based on the exposure of patients with BPH to a pulsative EM Field at radiofrequencies have been investigated.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients with BPH, aging 68–78 years old (y.o), were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the treatment group (10 patients, 74.0 ± 5.7 y.o) treated with the α-blocker Alfusosin, 10 mg/24 h for at least 4 weeks, and the electromagnetic group (10 patients, 73.7 ± 6.3 y.o) exposed for 2 weeks in a very short wave duration, pulsed electromagnetic field at radiofrequencies generated by an ion magnetic inductor, for 30 min daily, 5 consecutive days per week. Patients of both groups were evaluated before and after drug and EMF treatment by values of total PSA and prostatic PSA fraction, acid phosphate, U/S estimation of prostate volume and urine residue, urodynamic estimation of urine flow rate, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

Results

There was a statistically significant decrease before and after treatment of IPSS (P < 0.02), U/S prostate volume (P < 0.05), and urine residue (P < 0.05), as well as of mean urine flow rate (P < 0.05) in patients of the electromagnetic group, in contrast to the treatment group who had only improved IPSS (P < 0.05). There was also a significant improvement in clinical symptoms in patients of the electromagnetic group. Follow-up of the patients of this group for one year revealed that results obtained by EMFs treatment are still remaining.

Conclusion

Pulsed electromagnetic field at radiofrequencies may benefit patients with benign prostate hyperplasia treated by a non-invasive method.

Keywords

Pulsed EMFs Prostate hyperplasia IPSS α-blocker 

References

  1. 1.
    Foster KR, Repacholi MH (2004) Biological effects of radiofrequency fields; does modulation matter? Rad Res 162:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tofani S, Cintorino M, Barone D et al (2002) Increased mouse survival, tumor growth inhibition and decreased immunoreactive P53, after exposure to magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 23:230–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stronati L, Testa A, Villani P et al (2004) Absence of genotoxicity in human blood cells exposed to 50 Hz magnetic fields as assessed by comet assay, chromosome aberration, micronucleus, and sister chromatid exchange analyses. Bioelectromagnetics 25:41–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karkabounas S, Havelas K, Kostoula OK et al (2006) Effects of low intensity static electromagnetic fields on leiomyosarcoma and smooth muscle cell lines. Hell J Nucl Med 9:167–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charles L, Loomis D, Shy C et al (2003) Electromagnetic fields, polychlorinated biphenyls, and prostate cancer mortality in electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol 157:683–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sauer H, Hescheler J, Reis D et al (1977) DC electrical field-induced c-fos expression and growth stimulation in multicecellular prostate cancer spheroids. Br J Cancer 75:1481–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Islamov BI, Balabonova RN, Futnikov VA et al (2002) Effect of bioresonance therapy on antioxidant system in lymphocytes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Exp Biol Med 134:248–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Athanasiou A, Karkabounas S, Batistatou A et al (2007) The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on secondary skin wound healing. An experimental study. Bioelectromagnetics 28:362–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weintraub MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA et al (2003) Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:736–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmed M, Bell T, Lawrenxe WT et al (1997) Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostatron version 2.5) compared with transurethral of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia a randomized, controlled, parallel study. Br J Urol 79:181–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anson KM, Seenivasagam K, Watson GM (1994) Visual laser ablation of the prostate. Urology 43:276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bagley D, Erhard M (1995) Use of the holmium laser in the upper urinary tract. Tech Urol 1:25–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giannakopoulos X et al. (1996) Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate: preliminary results using the new generation TUNA III catheter on patients with symptomatic BPH controlled by a series of 50 patients using the TUNA II device. In: Abstracts of the XIIth Congress European Association of Urology, Paris, France, 1–4 September 1996Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD et al (1996) Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 47:48–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Madersbacher S, Pycha A, Klingler CH et al (1999) The International Prostate Symptom score in both sexes: a urodynamics-based comparison. Neurourol Urodyn 18:173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anninos P, Papadopoulos I, Kotini A et al (2003) Differential diagnosis of prostate lesions with the use of biomagnetic measurements and non-linear analysis. Urol Res 31:32–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bellofonte C, Vedruccio C, Tubolini P et al (2005) Non-invasive detection of prostate cancer by electromagnetic interaction. Eur Urol 47:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suss S (1997) Bioresonance therapy in the treatment of allergies. Every person has its own vibration pattern. Fortschr Med 115:16–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panagopoulos JD, Messini N, Karabarbounis A et al (2000) A mechanism for action of oscillating electric fields on cells. Biochem Biophys Res 272:634–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chiabrera B, Bianco B, Moggia E et al (1994) Interaction mechanism between electromagnetic fields and ion absorption: endogenous forces and collision frequency. Bioelectrochem Bioenergetics 35:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carafoli E (2004) The ambivalent nature of calcium signal. J Endocrinol Invest 27:134–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pessina GP, Aldimucci C, Palmi M et al (2001) Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect the intracellular calcium concentrations in human astrocytoma cells. Bioelectromagnetics 22:503–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ikehara T, Park KH, Yamagushi H et al (2002) Effects of time varying strong magnetic field on release of cytosolic free Ca2+ from intracellular stores in cultural bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Bioelectromagnetics 23:505–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abeele FV, Skryma R, Shuba Y et al (2002) Bcl-2-dependent modulation of Ca2+ homeostasis and store operated channels in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Cell 1:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kramer G, Mittereyer D, Marbeger M (2007) Is benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) an immune inflammatory disease? Eur Urol 51:1202–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson MT, Waite LR, Nindl G (2004) Non-invasive treatment of inflammation using electromagnetic fields: current and emerging therapeutic potential. Biomed Sci Instr 40:469–474Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jorgensen WA, Frome BM, Wallach C (1994) Electrochemical therapy of pelvic pain: Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on tissue trauma. Eur J Surg Suppl 574:83–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mihajlovic-Madzarevic V, Pappas P (2005) Treatment of refractory seizures due to a benign mass present in the corpus callosum with an ion magnetic inductor: case report. Brain Tumor Pathol 22:93–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xenophon K. Giannakopoulos
    • 1
  • Christos Giotis
    • 2
  • Spyridon Ch. Karkabounas
    • 3
  • Ioannis I. Verginadis
    • 3
  • Yannis V. Simos
    • 3
  • Dimitrios Peschos
    • 3
  • Angelos M. Evangelou
    • 3
  1. 1.Urological Clinic, University Hospital, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Nephrology ClinicGeneral Hospital of ArtaArtaGreece
  3. 3.Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations