Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 1125–1130 | Cite as

Exercise program to enhance physical performance and quality of life of older hemodialysis patients: a feasibility study

  • Mika L. Nonoyama
  • Dina Brooks
  • Alexandra Ponikvar
  • S. Vanita Jassal
  • Pia Kontos
  • Gerald M. Devins
  • Lily Spanjevic
  • Carol Heck
  • Judi Laprade
  • Gary NaglieEmail author
Nephrology – Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

Evaluate the feasibility of implementing a combined in-hospital and home-based exercise program in older hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Design

A prospective longitudinal 12-week pilot study.

Setting

A university hospital HD unit and patients’ homes.

Participants

A convenience sample of nine older (>55 years) patients undergoing HD.

Interventions

An individualized exercise program performed on HD days (3/week) and at home (2–3/week), including aerobic, flexibility, strength exercises and patient education.

Main outcome measures

Feasibility measure: patient participation. Exercise performance: Duke Activity Status Index (DASI); 2-min walk test (2MWT); Timed-up-and-go (TUG). Quality of life: The Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale (IIRS); The Kidney Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (KDQOL).

Results

The mean (SD) age of the patients was 68.1 (7.1). Participation in the in-hospital supervised exercise program was high, with patients exercising during 89% of HD sessions, but was lower for the unsupervised home-based component (56% exercised ≥ 2 times/week). Patients showed a gradual increase in the amount of exercise performed over 12 weeks. The 2MWT, TUG, IIRS and the KDQOL physical composite score demonstrated moderate responsiveness, while the DASI score exhibited only limited responsiveness.

Conclusions

This exercise program and the outcome measures were feasible for older HD patients: in-hospital participation was high, and physical performance and QOL measures exhibited moderate levels of responsiveness. Future, larger studies are needed to demonstrate whether intra-dialysis exercise, with or without home exercise, can lead to improved outcomes in this population.

Keywords

Aged Exercise Physical fitness Quality of life Renal dialysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Aging Pilot Project (IAP-73373). Dr. Naglie is supported by the Mary Trimmer Chair in Geriatric Medicine Research, University of Toronto. Dr. Brooks is supported by The Canada Research Chair in Rehabilitation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Dr. Kontos is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Award (2009–2014, MSH-87726).

References

  1. 1.
    Schaubel DE, Morrison HI, Desmenles M, Parsons DA, Fenton SSA (1999) End-stage renal disease in Canada: prevalence projections to 2005. Can Med Assoc J 60:1557–1563Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kutner NG, Cardenas DD, Bower JD (1992) Rehabilitation, aging and chronic renal disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 71:97–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Low-functioning hemodialysis patients improve with exercise training. Am J Kidney Dis 36:600–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Physical functioning and health-related quality-of-life changes with exercise training in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:482–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheema BS (2008) Review article: tackling the survival issue in end-stage renal disease: time to get physical on haemodialysis. Nephrology 13:560–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pianta TF, Kutner NG (1999) Improving physical functioning in the elderly dialysis patient: relevance of physical therapy. Am Nephrol Nurses’ Assoc J 26:11–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conn VS (1998) Older adults and exercise: path analysis of self-efficacy related constructs. Nurs Res 47:180–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kontos PC, Miller KL, Brooks D, Jassal SV, Spanjevic L, Devins GM, Souza MJ, Heck C, Laprade J, Naglie G (2007) Factors influencing exercise participation by older adults requiring chronic hemodialysis: a qualitative study. Int Urol Nephrol 39:1303–1311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Painter P, Blagg C, Moore GE (1996) Exercise: a guide for the people on dialysis patient. A comprehensive program. Geriatr Nephrol Urol 5:157–165Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    American College of Sports Medicine (2009) Chapter 10 exercise prescription for other clinical populations: renal disease. In: Thompson W, Gordon N, Pescatello L (eds) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 264–271Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:377–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swain DP, Leutholtz BC (1997) Heart rate reserve is equivalent to %VO2 reserve, not to %VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:410–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Quan H, Ghali WA (2003) Adapting the charlson comorbidity index for use in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 42:125–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, Cobb FR, Pryor DB (1989) A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol 64:651–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE (2002) Walk test (2-Minute) (2MWT). In: Physical rehabilitation outcomes measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision-making. B.C. Decker, Inc., Hamilton, pp 246–247Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rockwood K, Awalt E, Carver D, MacKnight C (2000) Feasibility and measurement properties of the functional reach and the timed up and go tests in the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M70–M73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Devins GM (1994) Illness intrusiveness and the psychosocial impact of lifestyle disruptions in chronic life-threatening disease. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1:251–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB (1994) Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res 3:329–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Husted J, Cook R, Farewell V, Gladman D (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    American College of Sports Medicine (2009) Table 4–8. Percentile values for maximal aerobic power. In: Thompson W, Gordon N, Pescatello L (eds) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 84–89Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson M, Medley A (1995) Performance of community dwelling elderly on the timed up and go test. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 13:17–30Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hopman W, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C, Joseph L, Brown J, Murray T, Adachi J, Hanley D, Papadimitropoulos E (2000) Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Can Med Assoc J 163:265–271Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Devins GM (2009) Using the illness intrusiveness ratings scale to understand health-related quality of life in chronic disease. J Psychosom Res (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.006
  25. 25.
    Cheema BSB, Singh MAF (2005) Exercise training in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review of clinical trials. Am J Nephrol 25:352–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Myll J, Paul S (2004) Determinants of exercise encouragement practices in hemodialysis staff. Nephrol Nurs J 31:67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williams A, Stephens R, McKnight T, Dodd S (1991) Factors affecting adherence of end-stage renal disease patients to an exercise programme. Br J Sports Med 25:90–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lo D, Chiu E, Jassal SV (2008) A prospective pilot study to measure changes in functional status associated with hospitalization in elderly dialysis-dependent patients. Am J Kidney Dis 52:956–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up and go test. Phys Ther 80:896–903PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mika L. Nonoyama
    • 1
  • Dina Brooks
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandra Ponikvar
    • 1
  • S. Vanita Jassal
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Pia Kontos
    • 1
    • 5
  • Gerald M. Devins
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Lily Spanjevic
    • 9
    • 10
  • Carol Heck
    • 11
  • Judi Laprade
    • 12
  • Gary Naglie
    • 1
    • 3
    • 13
    • 14
    • 15
    Email author
  1. 1.Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Division of NephrologyUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Ontario Cancer InstituteTorontoCanada
  7. 7.Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Program, Princess Margaret HospitalTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Departments of Psychiatry and PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  9. 9.Acute Medicine Program, Joseph Brant Memorial HospitalBurlingtonCanada
  10. 10.Faculty of NursingUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  11. 11.Allied Health, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  12. 12.Interprofessional Research, Women’s College HospitalTorontoCanada
  13. 13.Department of Health Policy Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  14. 14.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  15. 15.Toronto General Research InstituteTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations