Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 425–433 | Cite as

Acute tubular necrosis and pre-renal acute kidney injury: utility of urine microscopy in their evaluation- a systematic review

  • Mehmet KanbayEmail author
  • Benan Kasapoglu
  • Mark A. Perazella
Nephrology - Review

Abstract

Background

Urine microscopy with examination of the urine sediment examination provides useful diagnostic information about the histology of the kidneys. While most nephrologists use urine microscopy to assess for the presence of glomerular diseases, they are less apt to use this diagnostic test when pre-renal acute kidney injury (AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is clinically suspected. More often, tests such as fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) and fractional excretion of urea (FeUrea) are used to differentiate these two causes of acute kidney injury.

Design and Methods

A systematic search of Medline and the Cochrane Database, with no language restrictions, for studies in humans on urine microscopy with sediment examination for the differential diagnosis or risk stratification of acute kidney injury published between January 1960 and February 2009 was undertaken.

Results

Based on the limited available data on urine microscopy reviewed in this paper, this test has merit in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury to differentiate between pre-renal acute kidney injury and acute tubular necrosis. The presence and number of renal tubular epithelial cells and renal tubular epithelial cell casts and/or granular casts in the urine sediment appear beneficial in the diagnosis of ATN and may be useful in predicting more severe kidney damage that is reflected by non-recovery of AKI and need for dialysis.

Conclusions

Urine microscopy and urine sediment examination is widely available, easy to perform, and inexpensive. The clinical utility of urine microscopy in the differential diagnosis and prediction of outcome in AKI may be increased by using a simple urinary scoring system based on the number of renal tubular epithelial cells and renal tubular epithelial cell/granular casts.

Keywords

Acute kidney injury Urine microscopy Acute tubular necrosis Pre-renal azotemia Granular casts Renal tubular cells 

References

  1. 1.
    Bagshaw SM, Laupland KB, Doig CJ, Mortis G, Fick GH, Mucenski M, Godinez-Luna T, Svenson LW, Rosenal T (2005) Prognosis for long-term survival and renal recovery in critically ill patients with severe acute renal failure: a population based study. Crit Care 9:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E et al (2005) Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA 294:813–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hou SH, Bushinsky DA, Wish JB, Cohen JJ, Harrington JT (1983) Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency: a prospective study. Am J Med 74:243–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shusterman N, Strom BL, Murray TG, Morrison G, West SL, Maislin G (1987) Risk factors and outcome of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Am J Med 83:65–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S (2002) Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidnye dis 39:930–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagshaw SM, George C, Dinu I, Bellomo R (2008) A multi-centre evaluation of the RIFLE criteria for early acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1203–1210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ostermann M, Chang RW (2007) Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE. Crit Care Med 35:1837–1843CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liano F, Pascual J, Madrid Acute Renal Failure Study Group (1996) Epidemiology of acute renal failure: a prospective, multicenter, community-based study. Kidney Int 50:811–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S, Savage BR, Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA, Paganini EP, Chertow GM (2004) Spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: the PICARD experience. Kidney Int 66:1613–1621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geyer SJ (1993) Urinalysis and urinary sediment in patients with renal disease. Clin Lab Med 13:13–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S (2002) Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int 62:2223–2229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fogazzi GB, Cameron JS, Ritz E, Ponticelli C (1994) The history of urinary microscopy to the end of the 19th century. Am J Nephrol 14:452–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Becker GJ, Fairley KF (2001) urinalysis. In: Massry SG, Glassock RJ (eds) Textbook of nephrology. 4th edn, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp 1765–1783Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, Pirovano B, Muratore MT, Raimondi S, Berti S (2007) How to improve the teaching of urine microscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med 45:407–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C (2006) Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 144(6):427–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marcussen N, Schumann J, Campbell P, Kjellstrand C (1995) Cytodiagnostic urinalysis is very useful in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure and can predict the severity. Ren Fail 17(6):721–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chawla LS, Dommu A, Berger A, Shih S, Patel SS (2008) Urinary sediment cast scoring index for acute kidney injury: a pilot study. Nephron Clin Pract 110(3):c145–c150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perazella MA, Coca SG, Kanbay M, Brewster UC, Parikh CR (2008) Diagnostic utility of urine microscopy in the differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:1615–1619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bagshaw SM, Langenberg C, Bellomo R (2006) Urinary biochemistry and microscopy in septic acute renal failure: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 48(5):695–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gay C, Cochat P, Pellet H, Floret D, Buenerd A (1987) Urinary sediment in acute renal failure. Pediatrie 42:723–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Graber M, Lane B, Lamia R, Pastoriza-Munoz E (1991) Bubble cells: renal tubular cells in the urinary sediment with characteristics of viability. J Am Soc Nephrol 1:999–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brady HR, Brenner BM, Lieberthal W (1996) Acute renal failure. In: Brenner BM (ed) Brenner & Rector’s the kidney, 5th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1200–1250Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller TR, Anderson RJ, Linas SL, Henrich WL, Berns AS, Gabow PA, Schrier RW (1978) Urinary indices in acute renal failure: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 89:47–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vaz AJ (1983) Low fractional excretion of urine sodium in acute renal failure due to sepsis. Arch Intern Med 143:738–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fang LST, Sirota RA, Ebert TH, Lichtenstein NS (1980) Fractional excretion sodium with contrast media-induced acute renal failure. Arch Intern Med 140:531–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nanji AJ (1981) Increased fractional excretion of sodium in prerenal azotemia: Need for careful interpretation. Clin Chem 27:1314–1315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S (2002) Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int 62(6):2223–2229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pepin M, Bouchard J, Legault L, Ethier J (2007) Diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea and fractional excretion of sodium in the evaluation of patients with acute kidney injury with or without diuretic treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 50:566–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goldstein MH, Lenz PR, Levitt MF (1969) Effect of urine flow rate on urea reabsorption in man. Urea as a ‘tubular marker’. J Appl Physiol 26:594–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parikh CR, Jani A, Melnikov VY et al (2004) Urinary interleukin-18 is a marker of human acute tubular necrosis. Am J Kidney Dis 43:405–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R et al (2002) Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int 62:237–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nickolas TL, O’Rourke MJ, Yang J et al (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of a single emergency department measurement of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for diagnosing acute kidney injury. Ann Intern Med 148:810–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Herget-Rosenthal S, Poppen D, Husing J et al (2004) Prognostic value of tubular proteinuria and enzymuria in nonoliguric acute tubular necrosis. Clin Chem 50:552–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liangos O, Perianayagam MC, Vaidya VS et al (2007) Urinary N-acetyl-beta-(d)-glucosaminidase activity and kidney injury molecule-1 level are associated with adverse outcomes in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:904–912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vaidya VS, Waikar SS, Ferguson MA et al (2008) Urinary biomarkers for sensitive and specific detection of acute kidney injury in humans. Clin Transl Sci 1:200–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zappitelli M, Washburn KK, Arikan AA et al (2007) Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is an early marker of acute kidney injury in critically ill children: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care 11:R84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haase M, Bellomo R, Devarajan P et al (2009) Novel biomarkers early predict the severity of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults. Ann Thorac Surg 88:124–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bennett M, Dent CL, Ma Q et al (2008) Urine NGAL predicts severity of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a prospective study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:665–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Parikh CR, Mishra J, Thiessen-Philbrook H et al (2006) Urinary IL-18 is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Kidney Int 70:199–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL et al (2007) Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy. Clin Chim Acta 384:28–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A et al (2007) Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med 45:1251–1256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tsai JJ, Yeun JY, Kumar VA, Don BR (2005) Comparison and Interpretation of Urinalysis Performed by a Nephrologist Versus a Hospital-Based Clinical Laboratory. Am J of Kidney Dis 46:820–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Kanbay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benan Kasapoglu
    • 1
  • Mark A. Perazella
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Nephrology, Department of MedicineFatih University School of MedicineAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Section of NephrologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations