International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 253–257 | Cite as

“Pedogeriatrics”: a pediatric nephrologist’s outlook on common challenges facing pediatric and geriatric nephrologists

Nephrology - Editorial
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

Dramatic demographic changes longevity and medical progress helped create a new population made up of the survivors of previously fatal diseases. These trends pose new major social and economic challenges that should be accounted for in health policy making. This paper discusses the similarities between the specialties of pediatrics and geriatrics, especially in the realm of patient care. Children and the elderly share a limited autonomy and dependence on the human environment (i.e., willing and able caregiving persons) due to age or disease. The long-term care of dependent patients (DP) requires caregiving persons who share with dependent persons the risk of losing autonomy, facing burnout, family disruption, and interference with work and educational activities. Families with DPs may face potential losses of income because both patients and caregivers are partially or completely unable to work, the former for medical reasons and the latter due to the new demands on their time and energy. Additionally, new expenses have to be met because while direct medical expenses might be covered by insurance or the State, other expenses have to be financed by the family, such as co-payments for medicines, new water or electricity home installations, and transport and eventual hotel costs if they have to stay overnight near a hospital outside of their town. The main objectives of long-term care should be to maximize patients’ independence and prevent their physical and psychological deterioration while minimizing the social, economic and personal costs to caregivers. To achieve these goals, one needs a holistic approach, a multidisciplinary professional team (doctors, nurses, social workers, nutritionists and psychologists) and auxiliary staff (secretaries, electricians, administrators, messengers, cleaning staff, doormen, nursing aids and coordinators of medical appointments and medical procedures). Optimal management of DPs on chronic treatments such as chronic dialysis requires adequate communication skills, respectful attitudes toward patients and caregivers and effective use of communication and information technologies. Auxiliary personnel require specific training to contribute effectively to the DP attention processes. This paper postulates that pediatric and geriatric teams and their patients would benefit from closer training and sharing of experiences and systems.

Keywords

Pediatric nephrology Geriatrics Caregiver Pedogeriatrics Peritoneal dialysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Gratitude to Prof. Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos whose stimulus and suggestions helped me conceive this paper. Dr Daniel Perez, Director of the Adult Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis, provided the adult cases referred to in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Grünberg J, Verocay MC, Rébori A, Ramela V, Amaral C, Hekimian G, Viera M, Pouso J (2005) Twenty years pediatric chronic peritoneal dialysis in Uruguay: patient and technique survival. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1315–1319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nascher IL (1909) Geriatrics. N Y Med J 90:358Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nascher IL (1917) Geriatrics. Med Rev Rev 23:29–34Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Achenbaum WA (2004) Morley’s ‘‘a brief history of geriatrics’’ commentary. J Geront Med Sci 59:1153–1172Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morley JE (2004) A brief history of geriatrics [History]. J Geront Med Sci 59A:1132–1152Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freeman JT (1961) Nascher: excerpts from his life, letters, and works. Gerontologist 1:17–26Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galinki D, Kaplan R, Dwolatzky T (2008) Holistic approach to the geriatric patient: geriatric evaluation. In: Macias Nuñez J, Cameron JS, Oreopopulos DG (eds) The aging kidney in health and disease. Springer, New York, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lloyd H, Postlethwaite RJ (2005) Psychosocial care of children on dialysis. In: Clinical dialysis, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp 937–948Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belaso A, Barbosa D, Bettencourt AR, Diccini S, Sesso R (2006) Quality of life of family caregivers of elderly patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney 48:955–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Iorio B, Cillo N, Ciccinello E, Bellizzi V (2008) Burn out in the diálisis unit. J Nephrol 21(suppl 13):S158–S162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grünberg J (2005) The impact of logistics and resilience on compliance. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1823–1824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rader BJ, Watkins SL (1998) Psychological development and adherence to medical regimes in children with chronic failure. In: Fine RN, Alexander SR, Warady BA (eds) CAPD/CCPD in children, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, pp 413–446Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nevins TE (2005) “Why they do that?”. The compliance conundrum. Pediatr Nephrol 20:845–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dimkovic N, Oreopoulos DG (2008) Assisted peritoneal dialysis as a method of choice for elderly with end-stage renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol 40:1143–1150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Children and Adolescents Service of Pediatric Nephrology Pediatric Dialysis UnitHospital EvangelicoMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations