Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 109–112 | Cite as

The lack of correlation between mast cells and microvessel density with pathologic feature of renal cell carcinoma

  • Mohammad Ghassem Mohseni
  • Abdolreza MohammadiEmail author
  • Amir Said Heshmat
  • Farid Kosari
  • Ali Pasha Meysamie
Urology - Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

The growth of solid tumors requires angiogenesis. Evidence indicates that mast cells (MCs) play an important role in tumor angiogenesis but results are not definitive. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible effects of angiogenesis and the presence of MCs on the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Patients and methods

The study involved 40 patients with RCC (24 men and 16 women who were treated with radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2006, at our institution. The routine mast cell tryptase staining method was used to assess the MCs in both normal tissue and tumoral tissue. The immunohistochemical staining for CD34 antigen was used for determination of microvessel density. The relation between MC count and tumor status such as tumor stage, size, grade, and other clinicopathologic parameters in RCC were evaluated in this study.

Results

We found no relationship between the number of MCs and patient age, sex, tumor stage, grade, size. No association was noted between angiogenesis and either patient sex or age, tumor size, stage, and grade. No statistically significant correlation was found between the number of MCs and microvessel density in RCC (P-value = 0.45) but the max value of MCs and MVD were in clear cell carcinoma.

Conclusions

The MC count was not associated with tumor status such as tumor stage, size, grade, and other clinicopathologic parameters, however, MCs may be related to tumor angiogenesis and acceleration of tumor growth in RCC and therefore need further evaluation in RCC.

Keywords

RCC Mast cells Pathology 

References

  1. 1.
    Kirkali Z, Tuzel E, Mungan MU (2001) Recent advances in kidney cancer and metastatic disease. BJU Int 88:818–824. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02442.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirkali Z, Lekili M (2003) Renal cell carcinoma new prognostic factors? Curr Opin Urol 13:433–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nativ O, Sabo E, Reiss A, Wald M, Madjar S, Moskovitz B (1998) Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51:693–696. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00019-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dekel Y, Koren R, Kugel V, Livne PM, Gal R (2002) Significance of angiogenesis and microvascular invasion in renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res 8:129–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craft PS, Harris AL (1994) Clinical prognostic significance of tumor angiogenesis. Ann Oncol 5:305–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox SD (1997) Tumor angiogenesis and prognosis. Histopathology 30:294–301. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.d01-606.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patard JJ, Tazi H, Bensalah K et al (2004) The changing evolution of renal tumours: a single center experience over a two decade period. Eur Urol 45:490–493. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.12.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J (1991) Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weidner N, Carroll PR, Flax J, Blumendfeld W, Folkman J (1993) Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 143:401–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Hardin MJ, Squartini F, Angeletti CA (1992) Relation of neovascularization to metastasis of non-small lung cancer. Lancet 340:145–146. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93217-B CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bochner BH, Cote RJ, Weidner N et al (1995) Angiogenesis in bladder cancer: relationship between microvessel density and tumor prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1603–1612. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1603 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshino S, Kato M, Okada K (1995) Prognostic significance of microvessel count in low stage renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2:156–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00445.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG (1995) Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma. Lack of prognostic significance. Urology 46:27–30. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80153-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ribatti D, Crivellato E, Roccaro M, Ria R, Vacca A (2004) Mast cell contribution to angiogenesis related to tumor progression. Clin Exp Allergy 34:1660–1664. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02104.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirkali Z, Yorukoglu K, Ozkara E, Kazimoglu H, Mungan U (2001) Proliferative activity, angiogenesis and nuclear morphometry in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 8:697–703. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00405.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozer E, Yorukoglu K, Kirkali Z (2001) Tumor angiogenesis in superficial bladder cancer. Urol Integr Invest 6:70–78Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ehara T, Shigematsu H (2003) Mast cells in kidney. Nephrology 8:130–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1797.2003.00153.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slaton JW, Inoue K, Perrotte P et al (2001) Expression levels of genes that regulate metastasis and angiogenesis correlate with advanced pathological stage of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 158:735–743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tuna B, Yorukoglu K, Unlu M, Mun (2006) Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas. Eur Urol 50(3):530–534. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yildiz E, Ayan S, Goze F, Gokce G, Gultekin EY (2008) Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 101(6):758–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07318.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Ghassem Mohseni
    • 1
  • Abdolreza Mohammadi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amir Said Heshmat
    • 1
  • Farid Kosari
    • 2
  • Ali Pasha Meysamie
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Community MedicineUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations