Advertisement

An assessment of the clinical utility of transperineal urethrosphincteric block (TUSB) in outpatient rigid cystoscopy: a single-blind, randomized study

  • Adel Al-HunayanEmail author
  • Elijah O. Kehinde
  • Aida Shihab-Eldeen
  • Hamdy Abdulhalim
  • Ahmad Al-Saraf
Urology - Original Paper

Abstract

Background and objectives

Pain control in outpatient rigid cystoscopy is often achieved via the application of intraurethral lidocaine jelly. This clinical trial was designed to test the effectiveness and safety of a new method to provide local anesthesia, transperineal urethrosphincteric block (TUSB), prior to rigid cystoscopy.

Methods

Male patients posted for outpatient rigid cystoscopy were randomized to receive TUSB (group A) using 10–20 ml of 1% lidocaine, intraurethral 30 ml of 2% lidocaine jelly (group B) or intraurethral 30 ml of neutral jelly (group C) as a method of pain control. Following the procedure, plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured in group A patients. Outcome assessments included mean urethral and sphincteric numerated pain scores (0–10), overall discomfort level (0–4) and plasma lidocaine levels.

Results

One hundred and fifty patients were recruited, 50 in each group. When the three groups were compared, the ratio of group A patients with sphincteric pain score ≥2 was significantly the least. Also, the ratio of group A patients with discomfort level ≥2 was significantly less than the same ratio in either group B or C. Plasma lidocaine concentrations were within nontoxic levels and never exceeded 2.83 μg/ml in 39 subjects.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that TUSB is an effective and safe method in significantly relieving the pain associated with outpatient rigid cystoscopy. TUSB may offer urologists and anesthetists an alternative way to achieve pain control besides intraurethral lidocaine jelly during rigid cystoscopy.

Keywords

Cystoscopy Lidocaine Perineum Local anesthesia Nerve Block 

References

  1. 1.
    Kobayashi T, Nishizawa K, Ogura K (2003) Is instillation of anesthetic gel necessary in flexible cystoscopic examination? A prospective randomized study. Urology 61:65–68. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02002-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ye G, Rong-gui Z (2002) Optical urethrotomy for anterior urethral stricture under a new local anesthesia: intracorpus spongiosum anesthesia. Urology 60:245–247. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01732-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Issa MM, Perez-Brayfield M, Petros JA, Anastasia K, Labadia AJ, Miller LE (1999) A prospective study of transperineal prostatic block for transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Emory University Experience. J Urol 162:1636–1639. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68185-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodriguez A, Kyriakou G, Leray E, Lobel B, Guille F (2003) Prospective study comparing two methods of anaesthesia for prostate biopsies: apex periprostatic nerve block versus intrarectal lidocaine gel: review of the literature. Eur Urol 44:195–200. doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00188-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan MA, Beyzade B, Tau W, Virdi JS, Potluri BS (2002) Effect of the rate of delivery of lignocaine gel on patient discomfort perception prior to performing flexible cystoscopy. Urol Int 68:164–167. doi: 10.1159/000048443 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atanassoff PG, Weiss BM, Brull SJ (1998) Lidocaine plasma levels following two techniques of obturator nerve block. J Clin Anesth 8:535–539. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00117-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dale F (1993) Postoperative pain in the elective surgical patient. Br J Nurs 2:842–844, 846, 848–849Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klopfenstein CE, Forster A, Van Gessel E (2000) Anesthetic assessment in an outpatient consultation clinic reduces preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth 47:511–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiyohara LY, Kayano LK, Oliveira LM, Yamamoto MU, Inagaki MM, Ogawa NY et al (2004) Surgery information reduces anxiety in the pre-operative period. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 59:51–56. doi: 10.1590/S0041-87812004000200001 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodríguez-Rubio F, Sanz G, Garrido S, Sánchez C, Estudillo F (2004) Patient tolerance during outpatient flexible cystoscopy—a prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing plain lubrication and lidocaine gel. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38:477–480. doi: 10.1080/00365590410018666 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taghizadeh AK, El Madani A, Gard PR, Li CY, Thomas PJ, Denyer SP (2006) When does it hurt? Pain during flexible cystoscopy in men. Urol Int 76:301–303. doi: 10.1159/000092051 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ko HY, Kim KT (1997) Treatment of external urethral sphincter hypertonicity by pudendal nerve block using phenol solution in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35:690–693. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100471 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stein M, Lubetkin D, Taub HC, Skinner WK, Haberman J, Kreutzer ER (1994) The effects of intraurethral lidocaine anesthetic and patient anxiety on pain perception during cystoscopy. J Urol 151:1518–1521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldfischer ER, Cromie WJ, Karrison TG, Naszkiewicz L, Gerber GS (1997) Randomized, prospective, double-blind study of the effects on pain perception of lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant during outpatient rigid cystoscopy. J Urol 157:90–94. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65292-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pliskin MJ, Kreder KJ, Desmond PM, Dresner ML (1989) Cocaine and lidocaine as topical urethral anesthetics. J Urol 141:1117–1119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Müntener M, Fatzer M, Praz V, Straumann U, Strebel RT, John H (2005) Local anesthesia for transurethral manipulations: is a transrectal periprostatic nerve block effective? World J Urol 23:349–352. doi: 10.1007/s00345-005-0020-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eardley I, Broome GD, Murray A, Ramsay JW, Whitfield HN, Wilkinson DJ (1989) Plasma lignocaine levels during transurethral prostatectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 71:278–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mazze RI, Dunbar RW (1966) Plasma lidocaine concentrations after caudal, lumbar epidural, axillary block, and intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 27:574–579. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196609000-00007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adel Al-Hunayan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elijah O. Kehinde
    • 1
  • Aida Shihab-Eldeen
    • 1
  • Hamdy Abdulhalim
    • 1
  • Ahmad Al-Saraf
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Department of SurgeryKuwait UniversitySafatKuwait

Personalised recommendations