International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 63–67 | Cite as

Prognostic Factors of Success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Renal Stones

  • Abdulla Al-Ansari
  • Khalid As-Sadiq
  • Sami Al-Said
  • Nagy Younis
  • Osama A. Jaleel
  • Ahmed A. Shokeir
Article

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the factors that affect the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stones. Patients and methods: Between January 2000 and December 2003, 427 patients with single or multiple renal stones (<30 mm, largest diameter) underwent ESWL monotherapy using Storz SL 20 lithotriptor. The results of treatment were evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. Treatment success was defined as complete clearance of the stones or presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments <4 mm. The success rate was correlated with the characteristics of the patients, conditions of the urinary tract and stone features. Results: At 3-month follow-up, the overall success rate was 333/427 (78%). Repeat treatment was needed in 226 patients (53.1%). Post-ESWL auxiliary procedures were required in 36 patients (8.4%). Post-ESWL complications were recorded in 16 patients (3.7%). Of the 10 prognostic factors studied, 5 had a significant impact on the success rate, namely: renal morphology, congenital anomalies, stone size, stone site and number of treated stones. Other factors including age, sex, nationality, stone nature (de novo or recurrent) and ureteric stenting had no significant impact on the success rate. Conclusions: The success rate of ESWL for the treatment of renal stones could be predicted by stone size, location and number, radiological renal features and congenital renal anomalies.

Keywords

Kidney Shock wave lithotripsy Stone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen, TD, Preminger, GH 1997Management of calyceal calculiUrol Clin North Am248186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdel-Khalek, M, Sheir, KZ, Mokhtar, AA,  et al. 2004Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones. A multivariate analysis modelScand J Urol Nephrol38161167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lalak, NJ, Moussa, SA, Smith, G, Tolley, DA 2002The Dornier compact Delta lithotriptor: the first 500 renal calculiJ Endourol1637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sorensen, CM, Chandhoke, PS 2002Is lower pole calyceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?J Urol16823772382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zanetti, G, Montanari, E, Mandressi, A,  et al. 1991Long-term results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in renal stone treatmentJ Endourol56164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rassweiller, J, Kohrmann, KU, Alken, P 1992ESWL, including imagingCurr Opin Urol2291299Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tolon, M, Miroglu, C, Erol, H,  et al. 1991A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1569 units in an outpatient clinicJ Urol145695698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ackermann, DK, Fuhrimann, R, Pfluger, D,  et al. 1994Prognosis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of radiopaque renal calculi: a multivariate analysisEur Urol25105109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poulakis, V, Dahm, P, Witzsch, U,  et al. 2003Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial renal networkJ Urol16912501256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lingeman, JE, Siegel, YI, Steale, B,  et al. 1994Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysisJ Urol151663667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Logarakis, NF, Jewett, MA, Luymes, J, Honey, RJ 2000Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsyJ Urol163721725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pateson, RF, Lifshitz, DA, Lingeman, JE,  et al. 2002Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal modelJ Urol16822112215Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joseph, P, Mondal, AK, Singh, SK,  et al. 2002Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary studyJ Urol16719681971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdulla Al-Ansari
    • 1
  • Khalid As-Sadiq
    • 1
  • Sami Al-Said
    • 1
  • Nagy Younis
    • 1
  • Osama A. Jaleel
    • 1
  • Ahmed A. Shokeir
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Urology DepartmentHamad Medical CorporationDohaQatar
  2. 2.Professor of Urology, Urology and Nephrology CenterMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations