International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 97–99 | Cite as

Complications of Circumcision Performed within and Outside the Hospital

  • M. K. Atikeler
  • I. Geçit
  • V. Yüzgeç
  • O. Yalçın


Objective: Comparison of incidence of complications observed in circumcisions performed by traditional unlicensed individuals outside the hospital under the non-sterile conditions and in those performed by surgeons within hospital under surgical procedures. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study to determine the sort of complications and their incidence in 407 cases performed in two towns in our region by unlicenced traditional circumcisers (group 1) and 782 circumcision cases performed in Urology clinic by licenced surgeons (group 2) between April 1999 and August 2002. The complications were proportionally and statistically compared. Correlation between groups was assassed by Pearson correlation test and to compare the complication parameters chi-square test was used (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Results: The incidence of complications was higher in group 1. All complication parameters were found high in group 1 at a statistically significant extent. Conclusion: We could conclude that if the circumcision is performed by unlicensed traditional circumcisers instead of surgeons at the sterile hospital conditions it could result in severe early phase complications such as life-threatening or some late phase disorders with life long negative influences.


Circumcision Complications 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ozdemir, E. 1997Significant increased complication risks with mass circumcisionsBr J Urol80136139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atikeler, MK, Onur, R, Geçit, I. 2001Increased morbidity after circumcision from a hidden complicationBr J Urol88938940Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ozkan, S, Gürpınar, TA. 1997Serious circumcision complication: Penile shaft amputation and a new reattachment technique with a successful outcomeJ Urol15819461947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rizvi, SAH, Naqi, SAA, Hussain, M. 1999Religious circumcision: a Muslim viewBJU Int831316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rickwood, AMK. 1999Medical indications for circumcisionBJU Int834551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mirza FM. A study on complications of circumcision. Dissertation for fellowship CPSP. 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neulender, E, Walfisch, S, Kaneti, J. 1996Amputation of distal glans during neonatal ritual circumcision-a rare complicationBr J Urol77924925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gluckman, GR, Stoller, ML, Jacobs, MM. 1995Newborn penile glans amputatiun during circumcision and successful reattachmentJ Urol153778779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ponsk, LE, Ross, JH, Knipper, N. 2000Penile adhesion after neonatal circumcisionJ Urol164495496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baskin, LS, Canning, DA, Synder, HM. 1997Surgical repair of urethal circumcision injuresJ Urol15822692271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunsmuir WD, Gorden EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int 1997: 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Atikeler
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Geçit
    • 1
  • V. Yüzgeç
    • 1
  • O. Yalçın
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyHospital of Fırat Medical CenterElazıağTurkey
  2. 2.Fırat Tıp Merkezi HastanesiÜroloji KliniğiELAZIĞ/TURKEY

Personalised recommendations