International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 573–576 | Cite as

Histopathological evaluation of the preputium in preschool and primary school boys

  • Hüsnü Tokgöz
  • Fazlı Polat
  • Mustafa Özgür Tan
  • Özlem Erdem
  • İbrahim Bozkırlı
Article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the dermatopathology of the preputium in preschool and primary school children. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 32 boys subjected to circumcision procedure for religious belief consecutively between June 2003 and September 2003 in our clinic. The removed foreskin is examined by the same pathologist in all cases and the presence of any dermatopathology was noted. Results: The mean age of the children was 6 ± 2 (4–12) years. Three (9.3%) boys had complete phimosis while 2 (6.2%) had partial phimosis. Among 27 (84.3%) cases without phimosis, the histopathological examination of the preputium revealed focal lichenoid cellular infiltrate with epidermal atrophy in 1 (3.1%) patient. This pattern was considered as early lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA). Minor changes were reported in 1 (3.1%) boy namely minimal inflammation and oedema while 1 (3.1%) patient had more marked oedema and acute inflammatory cell infiltration (diagnosed as balanoposthitis). Three (9.3%) preputium specimens revealed evidence of chronic inflammation. Finally 2 (6.2%) boys showed increased melanin pigmentation in basal segment of the foreskin. In 5 (15.6%) patients with phimosis 1 (20%) (complete phimosis) had chronic inflammation and oedema while the other (20%) (partial phimosis) had chronic inflammatory infiltrate only. The rest of the boys with phimosis had normal preputial pathology. As a total, 22 (68.8%) of the 32 cases had totally normal preputial foreskin. Conclusion: The presence of foreskin in preschool and primary school children might rarely be associated with important inflammatory dermatoses like LSA even in the absence of phimosis.

Keywords

Circumcision Pathology Phimosis Preputium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Williams, N, Kapila, L 1993Complications of circumcisionBr J Surg8012311236Google Scholar
  2. To, T, Agha, M, Dick, PT, Feldman, W 1998Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infectionLancet35218131816Google Scholar
  3. Mallon, E, Hawkins, D, Dinneen, M,  et al. 2000Circumcision and genital dermatosesArch Dermatol136350354Google Scholar
  4. Hart, WR, Norris, HJ, Helwig, EB 1975Relation of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus of the vulva to development of carcinomaObstet Gynecol45369377Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers, RJG, Burton, PA, Bennett, RF,  et al. 1984Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. A common and distinctive cause of phimosis in boysArch Dermatol12010251027Google Scholar
  6. Bale, PM, Lochhead, A, Martin, HCO 1987Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans in childrenPediatr Pathol7617627Google Scholar
  7. Meuli, M, Briner, J, Hanimann, B, Sacher, P 1994Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus causing phimosis in boys: a prospective study with 5 year follow-up after complete circumcisionJ Urol152987989Google Scholar
  8. Mattioli, G, Repetto, P, Carlini, C,  et al. 2002Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in children with phimosis and hypospadiasPediatr Surg Int18273275Google Scholar
  9. Grossman, HB 1992Premalignant and early carcinomas of the penis and scrotumUrol Clin North Am19221226Google Scholar
  10. Liatsikos, NE, Perimenis, P, Dandinis, K,  et al. 1997Lichen sclerosis et atrophicus. Findings after complete circumcisionScan J Urol Nephrol31453456Google Scholar
  11. Shankar, KR, Rickwood, AMK 1999The incidence of phimosis in boysBJU Int84101102Google Scholar
  12. Clemmensen, OJ, Krogh, J, Petri, M 1988The histologic spectrum of the prepuce from patients with phimosisAm J Dermatopathol10104108Google Scholar
  13. Loening-Boucke, V 1991Lichen Sclerosus et atrophicus in childrenAm J Dis Child14510581061Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hüsnü Tokgöz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fazlı Polat
    • 1
  • Mustafa Özgür Tan
    • 1
  • Özlem Erdem
    • 1
  • İbrahim Bozkırlı
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology and PathologyGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.M. Özgür TanAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations