Advertisement

Barriers to green infrastructure development and planning in two Ethiopian cities: Bahir Dar and Hawassa

  • Kassahun GashuEmail author
  • Tegegne Gebre-Egziabher
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Barriers negatively affect green infrastructure (GI) planning and sustainable development of urban areas. The aim of this study is to analyze the major barriers to GI development and planning in Bahir Dar and Hawassa cities in Ethiopia. Qualitative data collected from focus group discussion (FGD) and key informant interview (KII) while quantitative data gathered using structured survey questionnaire. The result shows that, among the listed barriers, in Bahir Dar structural, capacity and technical barriers are the leading barriers, while in Hawassa structural, capacity and contextual or technical barriers came in the forefront that constrain GI planning and sustainable urban development.

Keywords

Barriers Descriptive research Green infrastructure Sustainable urban development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Addis Ababa University and University of Gondar for financial support for this research to the first author. We thank the data collectors and respondents of the survey. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Ahern J (2007) Green infrastructure for cities: the spatial dimension. In: Novotny V, Brown P (eds) Cities of the future: towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management. IWA Publishing, London, pp 267–283Google Scholar
  2. Angelstam P, Roberge JM, Lohmus A, Bergmanis M, Brazaitis G, Breuss M, Edenius L, Kosinski Z, Kurlavicius P, L armanis V, Lukins M, Mikusinski G, Raˇcinskis E, Strazds M, Tryjanowski P (2004) Habitat modeling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol Bull 51:427–453Google Scholar
  3. Bahir Dar city Municipality (2015). Annual report, Bahir Dar, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnhill K, Smardon R (2012) Gaining ground: green infrastructure attitudes and perceptions from stakeholders in Syracuse. New York Environmental Practice 14(1):6–16Google Scholar
  5. Benedict MA, McMahon ED (2006) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryman A (2008) Social research methods, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Caroline J, Hens A, Runhaar C, Leonie B (2013) Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Reg Environ Chang 13:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran WG (1963) Sampling Techniques, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Creative Research Systems (CRS) (2012) Sample size formula for sample size calculator. Retrieved from http://www.surveysystem.com/sample-size-formula.htm. Accessed 21 May 2017
  10. Creswell JW, Clark VLP (2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2ndedition. Bibliothek, Los AnglesGoogle Scholar
  11. CSA (2007). Statisatcal Report, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  12. CSA (2017). Statistical abstract, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Dapolito D (2010) Sitting green infrastructure: legal and policy solutions to alleviate urban poverty and promote healthy communities. Environ Aff 37:41Google Scholar
  14. Dattalo P (2008) Determining sample size balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, C., Hansen, R., Rall, E., Pauleit, S., Lafortezza, R., De Bellis, Y., Santos, A., & Tosics, I. (2015). Green infrastructure planning and implementation: the status of European green space planning and implementation based on an analysis of selected European city-regions, Green Surge, Version 2Google Scholar
  16. Debub Negarit Gazeta (2003). Southern nations, nationalities and peoples proclamation No.51/2002, Hawassa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR (2017) Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application. J Environ Manag 203:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietz ME (2007) Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollution 186:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Driscoll A, Ries P, Tilt J, Ganio L (2015) Needs and barriers to expanding urban forestry programs: an assessment of community officials and program managers in the Portland –Vancouver metropolitan region. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 14:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emily, V., & Andrew, M. (undated). Barriers to Green Infrastructure in the Hudson Valley: an electronic survey of implementers, Hudson River estuary program and the New York state water resource institute, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferguson A (2017) Identifying municipal barriers preventing the adoption of green infrastructure storm water management in Ontario. MA Thesis, The University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  22. Filion P, Lee M, Leanage N, Hakull K (2015) Planners' perspectives on obstacles to sustainable urban development: implications for transformative planning strategies. Plan Pract Res 30(2):202–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graeme S (2014) Drivers of and barriers to urban energy in the UK: a Delphi survey. Local Environ 19(5):497–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawassa City Municipality (2015) Annual report, Hwassa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Horinko Group (2015) The role of green infrastructure-nature, economics, and resilience. The Conservation Leadership CouncilGoogle Scholar
  26. Huron River Watershed Council (2014) Barriers preventing implementation of green infrastructure in Washtenaw County. Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Israel, G. (1992). Determining Sample Size, IFAS, University of Florida, PEOD-6Google Scholar
  28. Jim, C.Y., & Chan, M.W. (2016). Urban green space delivery in Hong Kong: spatial-institutional limitations and solutions. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 18 (2016) 65–85Google Scholar
  29. Kimmel C, David R, Bruce H, Michael M, Kris W (2013) Greening the grey: An institutional analysis of green infrastructure for sustainable development in the US. Center for leadership in global sustainability. In: Virginia TechGoogle Scholar
  30. Koc CB, Osmond P, Peters A (2017) Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies. Urban Ecosystems 20:15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krejcie R, Morgan D (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas 30(1):607–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lafortezza R, Davies C, Sanesi G, Konijnendijk CC (2013) Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions. I Forest 6:102–108Google Scholar
  33. Lee DH (1999) Institutional and technical barriers to risk-based water resources management: a case study. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levy S, Lemeshow S (1999) Sampling of populations methods and applications, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Madureira H, Andresen T, Monteiro A (2011) Green structure and planning evolution in Porto. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 10:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mathey J, Arndt T, Banse J, Rink D (2016) Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas-results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, vol 29, pp 384–392Google Scholar
  37. Matthews T, Lo AY, Byrne JA (2015) Re conceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landsc Urban Plan 138:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matus K, Xiao X, Zimmerman J (2012) Green chemistry and green engineering in China: drivers, policies and barriers to innovation. J Clean Prod 32:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McWilliam W, Brown R, Eagles P, Seasons M (2014) Barriers to the effective planning and management of residential encroachment with in urban forest edges: a southern Ontario, Canada case study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 13:48–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mell IC (2014) Aligning fragmented planning structures through a green infrastructure approach to urban development in the UK and USA. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 13:612–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MoUDCo (2012). Structure plan manual (revised version), urban planning, sanitation and beautification Bureau, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  42. MoUDH (2015) Ethiopia national urban green infrastructure standard. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  43. MoUDH & ESCU (2015) State of Ethiopian cities report. In: Addis Ababa EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  44. Naumann, S., McKenna, D., Timo, K., Mav, P., & Matt, R. (2011). Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects, Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Contract no. 070307/2010/577182/ETU/F.1, Ecologic institute and GHK ConsultingGoogle Scholar
  45. NMA (2013) National meteorological station report. Ethiopia, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  46. O'Donnell E, Lamond J, Thorne C (2017) Recognizing barriers to implementation of blue-green infrastructure: a Newcastle case study. Urban Water J 14(9):964–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pini B, Wild River S, Haslam McKenzie F (2007) Factors inhibiting local government engagement in environmental sustainability: case studies from rural Australia. Aust Geogr 38(2):161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pyke C, Warren MP, Johnson T, LaGro J Jr, Scharfenberg J, Groth P, Freed R, Schroeer W, Main E (2011) Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater with changing precipitation due to climate change. Landsc Urban Plan 103:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roe MH (2016) Developing shared socio-cultural values in green infrastructure planning. In: International workshop on brownfield regeneration 2016 with green infrastructure (GI): creating a culture and values, 13–15 march. Osaka University, Japan, p 2016Google Scholar
  50. Roe M, Mell IC (2013) Negotiating value and priorities: evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. J Environ Plan Manag 56(5):37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan P (2013) Sample size determination and power. John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandstrom U, Angelstam P, Khakee A (2006) Urban comprehensive planning- identify,ing barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landsc Urban Plan 75:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith J, Firth J (2011) Qualitative data analysis: application of the framework approach. Nurse Researcher 18(2):52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sreetheran M (2016) Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviors among the residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 25:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stephenson J (2008) The cultural values model: an integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 84:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thorne CR, Lawson EC, Ozawa C, Hamlin SL, Smith LA (2015) Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of blue-green infrastructure for urban flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management:1–13Google Scholar
  57. Weber M, Driessen P, Runhaar H (2011) Drivers of and barriers to shifts in governance: analyzing noise policy in the Netherlands. J Environ Policy Plan 13(2):119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams A (2013) Experience talks: the views of planners regarding the ability of the New South Wales planning system to implement ecologically sustainable development (ESD). Australian Planner 50(4):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Worstell C (2013) Statutory and regulatory barriers to green infrastructure implementation: green infrastructure in the state of New Jersey. New Jersey Future, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright H (2011) Understanding green infrastructure: the development of a con-tested concept in England. Local Environ 16:1003–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang, J., &. Zou, W. (2014). Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model. Build Environ 73,208222Google Scholar
  62. Young R, Zanders J, Lieberknecht K, Fassman-Beck E (2014) A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure. J Hydrol 519:2571–2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang W, Yang J, Ma L, Huang C (2015) Factors affecting the use of urban green spaces for physical activities: views of young urban residents in Beijing. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 14:851–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zikre H. (2003). The Revised proclamation for the establishment and organization and definition of powers and duties of urban centers of Amhara national regional State, proclamation no.91/2003, Year 9 No.2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesUniversity of Gondar, EthiopiaGondarEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesAddis Ababa University, EthiopiaAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations