Advertisement

Perimeter-area ratio effects of urbanization intensity on forest characteristics, landscape patterns and their associations in Harbin City, Northeast China

  • Hailiang Lv
  • Yanbo Yang
  • Dan Zhang
  • Hongju Du
  • Jianyu Zhang
  • Wenjie WangEmail author
  • Xingyuan He
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

To maximize the ecological services of urban forests, a better understanding of the effects of urbanization on urban forest characteristics, landscape metrics, and their associations is needed for landscape-related regulations in space-limited green infrastructure of metropolitan regions. In this study, Harbin, a typical fast-growing provincial-capital city in Northeast China, is used as a case study. Based on remote sensing images, field surveys, and correlation and variation partitioning analyses, we conclude that landscape characteristics and forest attributes have large variations among different urbanization intensity (UI) regions. Forest patch density (PD), landscape shape index, woody plants species richness, and the Shannon–Wiener index (H′) increased linearly, while stem section area and tree height decreased linearly with the increasing of UIs. UI had a greater influence on tree size and forest community attributes than the forest landscape pattern. Accordingly, any landscape regulation on forest attributes should be implemented according to UIs. In addition, Euclidean nearest neighbor distance(ENN-MN), mean perimeter-area ratio (PARA-MN), fractal dimension index(FRAC-MN), and PD could probably indicate forest attributes the most, e.g., the increase of PARA-MN may be accompanied with taller trees in low and heavy UI regions, but lower woody plants species evenness in low and medium UI regions. More diversified woody plants species, and afforested areas should be advocated in a low UI region, while in a heavy UI region, the conservation of large trees should be implemented. Our results highlight that the implementation of urban forest management should vary according to different urbanization regions to maximize ecological services.

Keywords

Landscape metrics Tree size Forest community attributes Impervious surface area fraction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by national key project from Ministry of Science and Technology (2016YFA0602304-2), NSFC project (31670699,41730641), basic research fund for national universities from the Ministry of Education of China (2572017DG04), Longjiang Professorship fund (T201702) and Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department (Grant No. 20170520083JH).

Supplementary material

11252_2019_850_MOESM1_ESM.docx (924 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 923 kb)

References

  1. Balfors B, Azcarate J, Mörtberg U, Karlson M, Gordon SO (2016) Impacts of urban development on biodiversity and ecosystem services. In Handbook on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment (pp. 167–194).  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478996.00014
  2. Congalton RG (2015) Remote sensing and image interpretation. 7th edition. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 81:615–616.  https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.8.615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cui L, Mu L (2016) Ectomycorrhizal communities associated with Tilia amurensis trees in natural versus urban forests of Heilongjiang in Northeast China. J Forestry Res 27:401–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0158-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dai LM, Li SL, Lewis BJ, Wu J, Yu DP, Zhou WM, Zhou L, Wu SN (2018) The influence of land use change on the spatial–temporal variability of habitat quality between 1990 and 2010 in Northeast China. J Forestry Res:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0771-x
  5. Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR (2017) Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application. J Environ Manag 203:171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke CR (2014) Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol Indic 43:44–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dou XS, Wang ZF, Yuan HM, Jing P (2015) Function, barriers and policies of green infrastructure construction in urban environment. Adv Mater Res 1065-1069:2814–2818.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1065-1069.2814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahey RT, Casali M (2017) Distribution of forest ecosystems over two centuries in a highly urbanized landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 164:13–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feld CK, Martins SP, Paulo SJ, de Bello F, Bugter R, Grandin U, Hering D, Lavorel S, Mountford O, Pardo I, PcTrtel M, Rcembke J, Sandin L, Bruce JK, Harrison P (2010) Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos 118(12):1862–1871.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17860.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grêt-Regamey A, Altwegg J, Sirén EA, Strien MJV, Weibel B (2016) Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning—a spatial decision support tool. Landsc Urban Plan 165:206–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He X, Ren Z, Zheng H, Wang W (2017) Urban Forest research in China: review and perspective. In: Ning Z, Novak D, Watson G (eds) Urban Forest sustainability. International Society of Arboriculture Champaign, Illinois, pp 12–37Google Scholar
  12. Hernandez-Stefanoni JL (2006) The role of landscape patterns of habitat types on plant species diversity of a tropical Forest in Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 15:1441–1457.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-0598-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jim CY, Zhang H (2013) Species diversity and spatial differentiation of old-valuable trees in urban Hong Kong. Urban For Urban Green 12:171–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Inki K, Jokinen S (1996) Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland. J Biogeogr 23:379–386.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1996.00033.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuuluvainen T (2009) Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in northern Europe: the complexity challenge. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 38:309–315.  https://doi.org/10.1579/08-A-490.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lafortezza R, Chen J, van den Bosch CK, Randrup TB (2017) Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities. Environ Res 165:431–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leal LR (2015) Application of Remote Sensing Technology and Ecological Modeling of Forest Carbon Stocks in Mt. Apo Natural Park, Philippines. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University. Available electronically from http : / /hdl .handle .net/1969 .1 /155005
  18. Li J, Zhang Z, Wang H, Wang S, Chen Q (2018) Urban land-use impacts on composition and spatiotemporal variations in abundance and biomass of earthworm community. J Forestry Res:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0807-2
  19. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J (2006) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 131:433–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Livesley SJ, Mcpherson GM, Calfapietra C (2016) The urban Forest and ecosystem services: impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and City scale. J Environ Qual 45:119–124.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Londe V, de Sousa HC, Kozovits AR (2017) Exotic and invasive species compromise the seed bank and seed rain dynamics in forests undergoing restoration at urban regions. J Forestry Res 28:1019–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0370-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lovell ST, Taylor JR (2013) Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landsc Ecol 28:1447–1463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu JL, Shen G, Wang Q, Ren ML, Pei ZX, Wei CH, Wang WJ (2016) Effect of urban tree species on soil physicochemical properties in Harbin, northeastern China, and afforestation implications. Bulletin of Botanical Research 36:549–555.  https://doi.org/10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2016.04.010 Google Scholar
  24. Lu J, Shen G, Wang Q, Pei z, Ren M, Wei C, Wang W (2017) Larch, ash, scots pine and farmland-induced differences on 17 soil parameters and their comprehensive analyses. Acta Ecol Sin 37:3543–3552. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201603080412
  25. Lv H, Wang W, He X, Xiao L, Zhou W, Zhang B (2016) Quantifying Tree and Soil Carbon Stocks in a Temperate Urban Forest in Northeast China. Forests 7:200.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f7090200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lv H, Wang W, He X, Wei C, Xiao L, Zhang B, Zhou W (2018) Association of urban forest landscape characteristics with biomass and soil carbon stocks in Harbin City, northeastern China. PeerJ 6:e5825.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27:19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement:81–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
  29. Manning WJ (2008) Plants in urban ecosystems: essential role of urban forests in urban metabolism and succession toward sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World 15:362–370.  https://doi.org/10.3843/SusDev.15.4:12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, and Ene E. (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
  31. Miller JE, Nelson SAC, Hess GR (2009) An object extraction approach for impervious surface classification with very-high-resolution imagery. Prof Geogr 61:250–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120902742920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Mänd R, Tryjanowski P, Møller AP (2016) Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:1284–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.1248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morgenroth J, Östberg J, Bosch CK, Nielsenc AB, Hauer R, Sjöman H, Chen W, Jansson M (2016) Urban tree diversity—taking stock and looking ahead. Urban For Urban Green 15:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagendra H, Sudhira HS, Katti M, Schewenius M (2013) Sub-regional assessment of India: effects of urbanization on land use, biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_6 Google Scholar
  35. Navarro Cerrillo RM, Esteves Vieira DJ, Ochoa-Gaona S, de Jong BHJ, del Mar Delgado Serrano M (2018) Land cover changes and fragmentation in mountain neotropical ecosystems of Oaxaca, Mexico under community forest management. J Forestry Res 3:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0568-3 Google Scholar
  36. Ozkan UY, Ozdemir I, Demirel T, Saglam S, Yesil A (2017) Comparison of satellite images with different spatial resolutions to estimate stand structural diversity in urban forests. J Forestry Res 28:805–814.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0353-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y, Zhao M, Hu Y, Wu J (2017) Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: thresholds identification. Sci Total Environ 607–608:706–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13:131–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Proulx R, Fahrig L (2010) Detecting human-driven deviations from trajectories in landscape composition and configuration. Landsc Ecol 25:1479–1487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9523-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ren Z, He X, Zheng H, Zhang D, Yu X, Shen G, Guo R (2013) Estimation of the relationship between urban park characteristics and park cool island intensity by remote sensing data and field measurement. Forests 4:868–886.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f4040868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ren Z, Zheng H, He X, Zhang D, Yu X, Shen G (2015) Spatial estimation of urban forest structures with Landsat TM data and field measurements. Urban For Urban Green 14:336–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ren Z, Du Y, He X, Pu R, Zheng H, Hu H (2018) Spatiotemporal pattern of urban forest leaf area index in response to rapid urbanization and urban greening. J Forestry Res 29:785–796.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0480-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riley CB, Herms DA, Gardiner MM (2017) Exotic trees contribute to urban forest diversity and ecosystem services in inner-city Cleveland, OH. Urban For Urban Green 29:367–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salvati L, Ferrara C, Mavrakis A, Colantoni A (2016) Toward forest “sprawl”: monitoring and planning a changing landscape for urban sustainability. J Forestry Res 27:175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0144-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schindler S, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T (2008) Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecol Indic 8(5):502–514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schindler S, Wehrden HV, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T, Kati V (2013) Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecol Indic 31:41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt KJ, Poppendieck HH, Kai J (2014) Effects of urban structure on plant species richness in a large European city. Urban Ecosyst 17:427–444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0319-y
  48. Shannon CE (1950) The mathematical theory of communication. 1963. Bell Labs Technical Journal 3:31–32.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3067010
  49. Su S, Jiang Z, Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2011) Transformation of agricultural landscapes under rapid urbanization: a threat to sustainability in hang-Jia-Hu region, China. Appl Geogr 31:439–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tuffery L (2017) The recreational services value of the nearby periurban forest versus the regional forest environment. J For Econ 28:33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2017.04.004 Google Scholar
  51. Uuemaa E, Mander Ü, Marja R (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: a review. Ecol Indic 28:100–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang HF, Qureshi S, Qureshi BA, Qiu JX, Friedman CR, Breuste J, Wang XK (2016) A multivariate analysis integrating ecological, socioeconomic and physical characteristics to investigate urban forest cover and plant diversity in Beijing, China. Ecol Indic 60:921–929.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang W, Lu J, Du H, Wei C, Wang H, Fu Y, He X (2017) Ranking thirteen tree species based on their impact on soil physiochemical properties, soil fertility, and carbon sequestration in northeastern China. For Ecol Manag 404:214–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang W, Wang H, Xiao L, He X, Zhou W, Wang Q, Wei C (2018a) Microclimate regulating functions of urban forests in Changchun City (north-East China) and their associations with different factors. iForest-biogeosciences and. Forestry 11:140–147.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2466-010 Google Scholar
  55. Wang W, Wang Q, Zhou W, Xiao L, Wang H, He X (2018b) Glomalin changes in urban-rural gradients and their possible associations with forest characteristics and soil properties in Harbin City, northeastern China. J Environ Manag 224:225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang W, Xiao L, Zhang J, Yang Y, Tian P, Wang H, He X (2018c) Potential of internet street-view images for measuring tree sizes in roadside forests. Urban For Urban Green 35:211–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang W, Zhang B, Xiao L, Zhou W, Wang H, He X (2018d) Decoupling forest characteristics and background conditions to explain urban-rural variations of multiple microclimate regulation from urban trees. PeerJ 6:e5450.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang Q et al. (2019a) Urbanization-induced glomalin changes and their associations with land-use configuration, forest characteristics, and soil properties in Changchun, Northeast China Journal of Soils and Sediments Online:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02266-x
  59. Wang W et al. (2019b) The effect of urbanization gradients and forest types on microclimatic regulation by trees, in association with climate, tree sizes and species compositions in Harbin city, northeastern China Urban Ecosystems  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-0823-9
  60. Wu J, Jenerette GD, Buyantuyev A, Redman CL (2011) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: the case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecol Complex 8:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xiao L, Wang W, He X, Hailiang L, Wei C, Zhou W, Zhang B (2016a) Urban-rural and temporal differences of woody plants and bird species in Harbin city, northeastern China. Urban For Urban Green 20:20–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xiao L Wang WJ, Zhang D, He XY, Wei CH, Lv HL, Zhou W, Zhang B. (2016b) Urban forest tree species composition and arrangement reasonability in Harbin, Northeast China. Chinese journal of ecology 35:2074-2081. Doi:  https://doi.org/10.13292/j.1000-4890.201608.027
  63. Xu HQ (2010) Analysis of impervious surface and its impact on urban heat environment using the normalized difference impervious surface index (NDISI). Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76:557–565.  https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.76.5.557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang Y, Lv H, Fu Y, He X, Wang W (2019) Associations between road density, Urban Forest Landscapes, and Structural-Taxonomic Attributes in Northeastern China: Decoupling and Implications. Forests 10:58.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010058
  65. Yeh CT, Huang SL (2009) Investigating spatiotemporal patterns of landscape diversity in response to urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan 93:151–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yin D, Song R, Qi J, Deng X (2018) Ectomycorrhizal fungus enhances drought tolerance of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica seedlings and improves soil condition. J Forestry Res 29:1775–1788.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0583-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhai C, Wang W, He X, Zhou W, Xiao L, Zhang B (2017) Urbanization drives SOC accumulation, its temperature stability and turnover in forests, northeastern China. Forests 8:e130.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang J, Sta P (1999) Effects of urbanization on forest vegetation, soils and landscape. Acta Ecol Sin 19:654–658Google Scholar
  69. Zhang D, Zheng HF, He XY, Ren ZB, Zhai C, Yu XY, Mao ZX, Wang PJ (2016) Effects of forest type and urbanization on species composition and diversity of urban forest in Changchun, Northeast China. Urban Ecosyst 19:455–473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0473-5
  70. Zhang B, Wang W, He X, Zhou W, Xiao L, Lv H, Wei C (2017a) Shading, cooling and humidifying effects of urban forests in Harbin city and possible association with various factors. Chin J Ecol 36:951–961.  https://doi.org/10.13292/j.1000-4890.201704.012
  71. Zhang D, Wang WJ, Zheng HF, Ren ZB, Zhai C, Tang Z, Shen GQ, He XY (2017b) Effects of urbanization intensity on forest structural-taxonomic attributes, landscape patterns and their associations in Changchun, Northeast China: implications for urban green infrastructure planning. Ecol Indic 80:286–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zheng W, Zhou Y, Gu H, Tian Z (2017) Seasonal dynamics and impact factors of urban forest CO2 concentration in Harbin, China. J Forestry Res 28:125–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0300-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhou W, Wang W, Zhang B, Xiao L, Lv H, He X (2017) Soil fertility evaluation for urban forests and green spaces in Changchun City. Acta Ecol Sin 37:1211–1220.  https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201604180723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhou W, Wang WJ, He XY, Zhang B, Xiao L, Wang Q, Lv HL, Wei CH (2018) Soil fertility and its spatial heterogeneity of urban green land in Harbin, NE China. Sci Silvae Sin 54:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180902 Google Scholar
  75. Zhu SH, Yan Y, Yun-Feng HU, Zhang C (2016) The impact of urbanization on ecosystem carbon storage in arid area. Journal of Natural Resources 31:1086–1099.  https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.20150731

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hailiang Lv
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yanbo Yang
    • 1
  • Dan Zhang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hongju Du
    • 1
  • Jianyu Zhang
    • 1
  • Wenjie Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xingyuan He
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Northeast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesChangchunPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Changchun UniversityChangchunPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations