Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 91–102 | Cite as

A green space vision in Southeast Michigan’s most heavily industrialized area

  • Paul DrausEmail author
  • Sam Lovall
  • Treva Formby
  • Lloyd Baldwin
  • Wanda Lowe-Anderson
Article
First Online:

Abstract

In 2011, Marathon Petroleum Company LP, which has operated a refinery west of the Rouge River since 1959, initiated a voluntary property purchase program in the neighborhood known as the Oakwood Heights. Approximately 80 % of residents accepted the offers made to them. Around the same time, a group of community and nonprofit stakeholders was developing a vision for revitalizing the area adjacent to the new Fort Street Bridge, through celebrating cultural heritage, preserving natural Great Lake habitats and supporting recreational opportunities along the river. As a result of the collaboration that developed, parts of the 110-acre area are now slated to become a wildlife habitat and urban forest, supporting other green infrastructure along the Rouge and Detroit Rivers. The paper proceeds in four parts: 1) we first provide background and an overview of the history of the Rouge River and its importance to the development of the culture and industry of Detroit, Michigan; 2) we then describe the development of the idea for expanded green space in this area as the confluence of two concurrent investments, one by government and one by industry, and a series of discussions between local stakeholders and community residents; 3) we present the vision for two contiguous green space areas, including a small interpretive park and a landscape designed to maximize ecosystem services; and 4) we conclude with a discussion of this project’s significance as it relates to both the city of Detroit and other cities facing similar challenges, exploring how private industry can work with NGOs and public agencies to transform such interstitial areas into multifunctional landscapes that provide tangible benefits to community residents as well as measurable environmental outcomes.

Keywords

Green infrastructure Environmental justice Industrial areas Collaborative research Novel ecosystems 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Rivers (2018) What is green infrastructure? Accessed 3/27/2018 at https://www.americanrivers.org/threats-solutions/clean-water/green-infrastructure/what-is-green-infrastructure/
  2. Anderson EC, Minor ES (2017) Vacant lots: an underexplored resource for ecological and social benefits in cities. Urban For Urban Green 21:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker G, Mohren R (1990) The biotope area factor as an ecological phenomenon. Lanschaft Planen and Bauen, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Benz TA (2017) Toxic Cities: Neoliberalism and Environmental Racism in Flint and Detroit Michigan. Critical Sociology, published online June 3. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517708339
  5. Branas CC, Cheney RA, MacDonald JM, Tam VW, Jackson TD, Ten Have TR (2011) A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. Am J Epidemiol 174(11):1296–1306PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breuste J, Qureshi S (2011) Urban sustainability, urban ecology and the Society for Urban Ecology (SURE). Urban Ecosyst 14:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne D (2013) Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation 19(3):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlisle J (2014) Some Detroiters Living With Marathon Plant Pollution Find Peace – At a Price. Detroit Free Press, February 16: 1Google Scholar
  9. Choudry KZ, Coles R, Qureshi S, Ashford R, Khan S, Mir RR (2015) A review of methodologies used in studies investigating human behavior as determinant of outcome for exposure to ‘naturalistic and urban environments’. Urban For Urban Green 14:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collier MJ (2014) Novel ecosystems and the emergence of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 9:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier MJ (2015) Novel ecosystems and social-ecological resilience. Landsc Ecol 30:1363–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dempsey D (2001) Ruin & recovery: Michigan’s rise as a conservation leader. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis M, Armitage RP, James P (2016) Social-ecological innovation: adaptive responses to urban environmental conditions. Urban Ecosyt 19:1063–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Detroit Free Press (1905) “Deepen the Rouge.” December 25, p. 7Google Scholar
  15. Dooling S (2009) Ecological gentrification: a research agenda exploring justice in the City. Int J Urban Reg Res 33(3):621–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downey L (2006) Using geographic information systems to reconceptualize spatial relationships and ecological context. Am J Sociol 112(2):567–612PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downey L (2007) Environmental racial inequality in Detroit. Social Forces 85(2):771–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaither JC (2015) Smokestacks, Parkland, and community composition: examining environmental burdens and benefits in Hall County, Georgia, USA. Environ Behav 47:1127–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallagher J (2011) Marathon offers to buy out Detroit homeowners near refinery amid $2.2B expansion. In: The Detroit Free Press, November 2, accessed at http://www.freep.com/article/20111102/BUSINESS06/111102038/Marathon-offers-buy-out-Detroit-homeowners-near-refinery-amid-2-2B-expansion Google Scholar
  20. Gilstad-Hayden K, Wallace LR, Carroll-Scott A, Meyer SR, Barbo S, Murphy-Dunning C, Ickovics JR (2015) Research note: greater tree canopy cover is associated with lower rates of both violent and property crime in New Haven, CT. Landsc Urban Plan 143:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartig JH (2010) Burning Rivers: Revival of Four Urban Industrial Rivers That Caught Fire. Burlington, Canada, Ecovision World Monograph SeriesGoogle Scholar
  22. Hauru K, Lehvavirta S, Korpela K, Kotze DJ (2012) Closure of view to the urban matrix has positive effects on perceived restorativeness in urban forests in Helsinki, Finland. Landsc Urban Plan 107(4):361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henrickson WW (1991) Detroit perspectives: crossroads and turning points. Wayne State University Press, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  24. Heynen NC, Perkins HA, Roy P (2006) The political ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Aff Rev 42:3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24(11):599–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kabisch N, Haase D (2014) Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in berlin, Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 122:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kabisch N, Qureshi S, Haase D (2015) Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces —A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environ Impact Assess Rev 50:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kunzmann, K (2004) Creative brownfield redevelopment: the experience of the IBA Emscher Park initiative in the Ruhr in Germany. Pp. 201-217 in Recycling the City: The Use and Reuse of Urban Land (Greenstein, R and Sungu-Eryilmaz, Y, eds.) Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land PolicyGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam T (2010) Life in our most polluted ZIP code. Detroit Free Press June 20: A1Google Scholar
  30. Loures L (2015) Post-industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas. Habitat International 45:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundholm JT, Richardson PJ (2010) Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. J Appl Ecol 47:966–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKendry C, Janos N (2015) Greening the industrial city: equity, environment, and economic growth in Seattle and Chicago. Int Environ Agreements 15:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meerow S, Newell J (2016) Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where and why? Urban Geography published online July 12, pp. 1-12, accessed 6/17/2017 at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
  34. Meerow S, Newell J (2017) Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: growing resilience in Detroit. Landsc Urban Plan 159:62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Michigan Department of Transportation (2010) Environmental assessment programmatic section 4(f) evaluation for the proposed replacement of the Fort Street (M-85) Bascule Bridge Over the Rouge River in the City of Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan. Accessed 4/4/2018 at https://www.michigan.gov/documents/MDOT_FortStreetEAcover_110724_7.pdf
  36. Montgomery A (2016) Reappearance of the public: Placemaking, Minoritization and resistance in Detroit. Int J Urban Reg Res 40(4):776–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Napieralski J, Keeling R, Dziekan M, Rhodes C, Kelly A, Kobberstad K (2015) Urban stream deserts as a consequence of excess stream burial in urban watersheds. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105:649–664.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1050753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Napieralski JA, Carvalhaes T (2016) Urban stream deserts: mapping a legacy of urbanization in the United States. Appl Geogr 67:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nassauer JI, Raskin J (2014) Urban vacancy and land use legacies: a frontier for urban ecological research, design and planning. Landsc Urban Plan 125:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nevins A, Hill FE (1954) Ford: expansion and challenge, 1915–1933. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Ouellette P, Kaplan R, Kaplan S (2005) The monastery as a restorative environment. J Environ Psychol 25:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poe OM (1889) Preliminary examination of Rouge River, Michigan, at its junction with Detroit River, and up the river to bridge of St. Louis and Wabash railroad. The executive documents of the house of representatives for the first session of the fiftieth congress, 1887–88. Appendix KK – Report of Lieut. Col. Poe. Washington: Government Printing Office, 2275–2278Google Scholar
  43. Poe OM (1891) Improvement of Rouge River, Michigan. The executive documents of the house of representatives for the Second Session of the 51st Congress, 1890–1891, Appendix LL 16. Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 2747–2749Google Scholar
  44. Rose J (2016) Dumping in Detroit. Sierra Club blog post, January 29. In: Accessed 3/27/2018 at https://www.sierraclub.org/planet/2016/01/dumping-detroit Google Scholar
  45. Roy Chowdhury, R, Larson, K, Grove, M, Polsky, C, Cook, E, Onsted, J, Ogden, L (2011) A multi-scalar approach to theorizing socio-ecological dynamics of urban residential landscapes. Cities and the environment (CATE) 4(1) article 6. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol4/iss1/6 Google Scholar
  46. Saha R, Mohai P (2005) Historical context and hazardous waste facility siting: understanding temporal patterns in Michigan. Soc Probl 52(4):618–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saporito S, Casey D (2015) Are There Relationships Among Racial Segregation, Economic Isolation, and Proximity to Green Space? Hum Ecol 21(2):114–131Google Scholar
  48. Schwarz K, Fragkias M, Boone CG, Zhou W, McHale M, Grove JM, O’Neill-Dunne J, McFadden JJ, Buckley GL, Childers D, Ogden L, Pincetl P, Pataki D, Whitmer A, Cadenasso ML (2015) Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLOS ONE 10(4).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
  49. Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (2008) Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front Ecol Environ 6(10):547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith CL (2007) Economic deprivation and environmental inequality in postindustrial Detroit. Organ Environ 20(1):25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snep RPH, Ottburg FGWA (2008) The ‘habitat backbone’ as strategy to conserve pioneer species in dynamic port habitats: lessons from the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in the port of Antwerp (Belgium). Landsc Ecol 23:1277–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stone-Jovicich S (2015) Probing the interfaces between the social sciences and social-ecological resilience: insights from integrative and hybrid perspectives in the social sciences. Ecol Soc 20(2):25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Troy AR, Grove JM, O’Neill-Dunne JP (2012) The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban-rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landsc Urban Plan 106:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. US EPA (2017) What is Green Infrastructure? Accessed 27 March 2018 at https://www.epa.gov/greeninfrastructure/what-green-infrastructure
  55. Watkins SL, Mincey SK, Vogt J, Sweeney SP (2016) Is planting equitable? An examination of the spatial distribution of nonprofit urban tree-planting programs by canopy cover, income, race, and ethnicity. Environ Behav 49(4):452–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wen M, Zhang X, Harris CD, Holt JB, Croft JB (2013) Ann Behav Med 45(Suppl 1):18–27PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolch JR, Byrne J, Newell JP (2014) Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough. Landsc Urban Plan 125:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Draus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sam Lovall
    • 2
  • Treva Formby
    • 3
  • Lloyd Baldwin
    • 4
  • Wanda Lowe-Anderson
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesThe University of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA
  2. 2.PEA, Inc.BrightonUSA
  3. 3.Marathon Petroleum Company LPDetroitUSA
  4. 4.Michigan Department of TransportationLansingUSA
  5. 5.Boynton Subsector 48217 Core GroupLincoln ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options