Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 19–35 | Cite as

Understanding citizen perceptions of the Eastern Hills of Bogota: a participatory place-based ecosystem service assessment

  • Eleanor RobsonEmail author
  • Lorrae van Kerkhoff
  • Steven Cork
Article

Abstract

Integrated assessment of natural and human systems is regarded as a way to facilitate effective governance of complex environmental issues, and engagement of stakeholders is recognised as a key requirement of such an assessment. Place-based ecosystem service analysis is one framework for integrative research on understanding citizen values. By using the lens of place, participants can articulate values and perceptions. Advantages of this framework are particularly relevant in the urban setting, given that the population and functioning of cities create especially high pressure on ecosystems and biodiversity of the surrounding areas. This study reports on a place-based ecosystem service analysis study in Bogota, Colombia. It aimed to identify how urban citizens conceptualise the socio-ecological value of a nearby protected natural area, the Eastern Hills Protected Forest Area. The objective was to generate an integrated understanding of the services the Hills provide to Bogota. The study found that the services of fresh water and habitat provision, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, erosion control and climate and air quality were highly prioritised ecosystem services due to their fundamental importance for the maintenance of human life. The Hills also hold cultural value for Bogotans, such as a sense of belonging and identity, being the natural symbol of Bogota and inspiration for escapism. There is enthusiasm for greater stewardship and conservation of the Hills, and demand for a greater role in decision making. The place-based ecosystem service approach can be developed as a tool for developing an integrated understanding of citizen values for landscape management.

Keywords

Ecosystem services Ecosystem service demand Citizen values Place-based assessment Bogota 

References

  1. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53(12):1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessa L, Kliskey A, Brown G (2008) Social–ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space. Landsc Urban Plan 85(1):27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avolio M, Pataki DE, Gillespie T, Jenerette GD, McCarthy HR, Pincetl S, Weller-Clarke L (2015) Tree diversity in southern California's urban forest: the interacting roles of social and environmental variables. Front Ecol Evol 3:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá (2007) Pasado, presente y futuro de la localidad de Usme. http://www.institutodeestudiosurbanos.info/dmdocuments/cendocieu/coleccion_digital/Localidades/Usme/Pasado_Presente_Futuro_Usme-CCB.pdf. Accessed 10 Jul 2016
  5. Centro de Investigaciones da la Facultad de Arquitectura (1999) Los Cerros: Paisaje e Identidad Cultural. Identificación y valoración del patrimonio ambiental y cultural de los cerros orientales en Santa Fe de Bogotá. Universidad de los Andes, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke LW, Jenerette GD (2015) Biodiversity and direct ecosystem service regulation in the community gardens of Los Angeles, CA. Landsc Ecol 30(4):637–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems, vol 2. Ecological Society of America, Washington (DC)Google Scholar
  8. El Tiempo (2015) Se agudiza la batalla por los Cerros Orientales. http://www.eltiempo.com/bogota/debate-por-cerros-orientales/15283035. Accessed 13 April 2016
  9. De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El Espectador (2016) Será demolida lujosa construcción que invadió los cerros orientales de Bogotá. https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/bogota/sera-demolida-lujosa-construccion-invadio-los-cerros-or-articulo-672201
  11. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability, vol 10. pp 137-152Google Scholar
  12. García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, López-Santiago CA, Aguilera PA, Montes C (2012) The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ Sci Pol 19:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Nieto AP, Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B (2015) Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders′ profiles. Ecosyst Serv 13:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gómez Lee ID (2009) Conflictos entre los derechos a la propiedad y el medio ambiente en los Cerro Orientales de Bogota y la inseguridad juridica. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo 2:223–246Google Scholar
  15. Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, Ratamäki O, Jax K (2013) Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environ Sci Pol 25:13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiménez Ramos LM (2011) Unas montañas al servicio de Bogotá: Imaginarios de naturaleza en la reforestación de los Cerros 1899–1924. Universidad de los Andes, BogotaGoogle Scholar
  17. Leon M, Catalina D (2013) Análisis e Interpretación de la Prospectiva Comunitaria y su Contribución en la Planificación del Territorio Cerros Orientales. Universidad de Manizales, ManizalesGoogle Scholar
  18. Martínez C (1976) Bogotá: Sinoposis sobre su evolución urbana. Ediciones Escala, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  19. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One 7(6):e38970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McPhearson T, Parnell S, Simon D, Gaffney O, Elmqvist T, Bai X, Roberts D, Revi A (2016) Scientists must have a say in the future of cities. Nature 538(7624):165–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mejía Pavony GR (2000) Los años del cambio: historia urbana de Bogotá, 1820–1910. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  22. Mesa Ambiental de los Cerros Orientales (2008) Territorios Populares, Ambiente y Hábitat. Propuestas de Política Pública desde los Cerros Orientales de Bogotá. https://mesacerros.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/cerros.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2017
  23. Meza CA (2008) Urbanización, conservación y ruralidad en los Cerros Orientales de Bogota. Revista Colombiana de Antropologia 44(2):439–480Google Scholar
  24. Norgaard RB (2010) Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity binder. Ecol Econ 69(6):1219–1227Google Scholar
  25. Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Dessane EB, Islar M, Kelemen E (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramírez Hernández A (2009) Análisis de los conflictos ambientales en interfases urbano-rurales. Revista Nodo 6(3):71–96Google Scholar
  27. Ramírez JC, Parra-Peña RI (2013) Metrópolis de Colombia: Aglomeraciones y Desarrollo. Estudios y Perspectivas. CEPAL, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  28. Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68(5):1301–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raymond CM, Fazey I, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Robinson GM, Evely AC (2010) Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. J Environ Manag 91(8):1766–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC (2009) Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag 90(5):1933–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rozo-Barajas V (2011) Valores Locales y Problemas Ambientales: Asentamientos de Origen Informal. Paper presented at the N-AERUS XII Conference, Madrid, 20-22 October 2011Google Scholar
  32. Satterfield T (2001) In search of value literacy: suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environ Values 10(3):331–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaich H, Bieling C, Plieninger T (2010) Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 19(4):269–277Google Scholar
  34. Secretaría de Planeación (2016) Proyecciones de población 2016–2020Google Scholar
  35. Secretaría de Planeación, Secretaría Distrital de Hábitat, Fondo Patrimonio Natural (2015) ¡Asi viven los cerros! Experiencias de habitabilidad. Secretaría Distrital de Planeación, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  36. Secretaría Distrital de Planeación (2009) Conociendo las Localidades de Bogotá: Resumen de los principales aspectos físicos, demográficos y socioeconómicos. http://www.sdp.gov.co/portal/page/portal/PortalSDP/InformacionTomaDecisiones/Estadisticas/Bogot%E1CiudaddeEstad%EDsticas/2009/DICE092-CartillaConociendoLocalidades-2009.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2016
  37. Secretaría Distrital de Planeación (2013) POT: Una Ciudad Bien Pensada. http://www.sdp.gov.co/portal/page/portal/PortalSDP/POT_2020/Cartilla-POT-DIGITAL-02042013.pdf
  38. Secretaría Distrital de Planeación (2014) Encuesta Multiproposito 2014: Principales Resultados. http://www.culturarecreacionydeporte.gov.co/sites/default/files/cartilla-multiproposito1.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2017
  39. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2016) Ecosystem Services. http://www.teebweb.org/resources/ecosystem-services/
  40. United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, HighlightsGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Riper CJ, Kyle GT (2014) Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis. J Environ Manag 145:374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complex 15:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Fenner School of Environment and SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.The Crawford School of Public PolicyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations