Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 291–304 | Cite as

An urban stream can support a healthy population of coastal cutthroat trout

  • Brook P. Silver
  • J. Michael Hudson
  • Christian T. Smith
  • Kenneth Lujan
  • Melissa Brown
  • Timothy A. Whitesel
Article

Abstract

Urbanization presents numerous challenges to aquatic species. For fish, typical threats include altered flow dynamics, poor water quality, and degraded food webs. These threats can be detrimental to fish and whether urban environments can support healthy populations is unclear. Tryon Creek is one of the largest urban watersheds in Portland, Oregon where developed land accounts for 55.6% of total land use. We used demographic, life history, disease, and genetic indices to assess the overall health of the Coastal Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) population in Tryon Creek. Results of these population indicators were within ranges for streams with Coastal Cutthroat Trout populations not influenced by urbanization and considered healthy. Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Tryon Creek exhibited a mean condition factor of 1.07 (95% CI 0.95–1.19, range 0.94–1.24), four size-classes, an estimated density of 0.01–0.03 individuals/m2, and migratory behavior. The population did not exhibit excessive deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Genetic diversity in Tryon Creek (He = 0.76; allelic richness = 6.6) was comparable to that observed in non-urbanized streams in the Mt. Hood National Forest (He = 0.72; allelic richness = 5.6). Moreover, allele frequencies appeared stable, and no genetic divergence was detected among generations (F ST ~0.00; non-significant allele frequency heterogeneity tests). The population tested negative for 12 different pathogens and results for Renibacterium salmoninarum were inconclusive. The characteristics of Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Tryon Creek were similar to populations not influenced by urbanization which suggests an urban stream can support a healthy fish population.

Keywords

Urban Coastal cutthroat trout Ecology Population Health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the City of Portland, particularly Jennifer Devlin, Kaitlin Lovell, and Cindy Studebaker, for their support of this investigation and their leadership in urban ecology. Additional thanks to the City of Lake Oswego, Friends of Tryon Creek, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, National Marine Fisheries Service, Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife, Oregon State Parks, Oregon Department of Transportation, Tryon Creek Watershed Council, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their involvement in the management and restoration of Tryon Creek. We are grateful to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Abernathy Fish Technology Center Genetics Laboratory for technical assistance provided by Jennifer Von Bargen and Justin Bohling who provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript and to Julianne Harris at the Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office who provided Bayesian analysis. We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the manuscript. This study was funded, in part, by the City of Portland and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Supplementary material

11252_2017_711_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (15 kb)
Online Resource 1 References, comparison parameters, and locations of non-urban Coastal Cutthroat Trout populations used in this study (PDF 15 kb)

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Bayles D, Bottom DL et al (1997) Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation. Conserv Biol 11:140–152.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95248.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augerot X, Steinback C, Fobes N (2005) Atlas of Pacific Salmon: the first map-based status assessment of salmon in the north Pacific. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumsteiger J, Hankin DG, Loudenslager EJ (2005) Genetic analyses of juvenile steelhead, coastal cutthroat trout, and their hybrids differ substantially from field identifications. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:829–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L et al (2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire, Ge ́nome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Universite ́ de Montpellier II, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  5. Benejam L, Alcaraz C, Benito J et al (2012) Fish catchability and comparison of four electrofishing crews in Mediterranean streams. Fish Res 123–124:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown LR, Cuffney TF, Coles JF et al (2009) Urban streams across the USA: lessons learned from studies in 9 metropolitan areas. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:1051–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1899/08-153.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callison E, Rhodes J, Fanshier C et al (2002) Tryon Creek watershed baseline assessment. https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/data%20libraries/files/OWEB/OWEB_918_2_Tryon%20Creek%20Watershed%20Baseline%20Assessment%20pt1of2.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  8. Camargo M, Martinez C (2007) Histopathology of gills, kidney and liver of a Neotropical fish caged in an urban stream. Neotrop Ichthyol 5:327–336.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252007000300013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campton DE, Utter FM (1985) Natural hybridization between steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri) and coastal cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki clarki) in two Puget sound streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:110–119.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f85-014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carney M, Taggart JB, Høyheim B (2000) Characterization of microsatellite and minisatellite loci in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol Ecol 9:2175–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chase DM, Pascho RJ (1998) Development of a nested polymerase chain reaction for amplification of a sequence of the p57 gene of Renibacterium salmoninarum that provides a highly sensitive method for detection of the bacterium in salmonid kidney. Dis Aquat Org 34:223–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services (COP) (2005) Fanno and Tryon creeks watershed management plan. Portland, OR. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/436812. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  13. Connolly PJ, Williams TH, Gresswell RE (2008) The 2005 coastal cutthroat trout symposium: status, management, biology and conservation. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Portland ISBN: 978-0-6152-3399-4Google Scholar
  14. Diefenderfer HL, Roegner GC, Thom RM et al (2005) Evaluating cumulative ecosystem response to restoration projects in the Columbia River Estuary, annual report 2005. PNNL -15934. Final Report to the US Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District. Richland, WA. http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-15934.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  15. Do C, Waples RS, Peel D et al (2014) NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 14:209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12157 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Duffy WG, Bjorkstedt EP (2008) Demographics of coastal cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii in Prairie Creek, California. In: Connolly PJ, Williams TH, Gresswell RE (eds) The 2005 coastal cutthroat trout symposium: status, management, biology and conservation. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Portland, pp 100–106Google Scholar
  17. Evelyn TP (1993) Bacterial kidney disease – BKD. In: Inglis V, Roberts RJ, Bromage NR (eds) Bacterial diseases of fish. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
  18. Federal Register (2000) National priorities list for uncontrolled hazardous waste sites 65(232): 75179–75186Google Scholar
  19. Foreman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2402669 Google Scholar
  20. Froese R (2006) Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 22:241–253.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fryer JL, Sanders JE (1981) Bacterial kidney disease of salmonid fish. Annu Rev Microbiol 35:273–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Giger RD (1972) Ecology and management of coastal cutthroat trout in Oregon. Oregon State Game Commission, Research Division, Corvallis. http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/59755. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  23. Graham JC, Ward DL (2002) Distribution of fish in Portland tributary streams. Clackamas, Oregon http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/oscrp/cri/docs/PortlandTribs2001-02.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2017Google Scholar
  24. Gresswell RE et al (2006) A spatially explicit approach for evaluating relationships among coastal cutthroat trout, habitat, and disturbances in small Oregon streams. In: Hughes et al. landscape influences on stream habitats & biological assemblages. AFS Symposium 48Google Scholar
  25. Grimmond S (2007) Urbanization and global environmental change: local effects of urban warming. Geogr J 173:83–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.232_3.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griswold KE (2009) Report on the coastal cutthroat trout monitoring workshop. Vancouver, WA. http://www.coastalcutthroattrout.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CutthroatTroutScienceWorkshopJune2006FINAL.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  27. Haak AL, Williams JE, Neville HM et al (2010) Conserving peripheral trout populations: the values and risks of life on the edge. Fisheries 35:530–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins DK (1997) The effects of interspecific interactions and hybridization on coastal cutthroat trout. In: Hall JD, Bisson PA, Gresswell RE (eds) Sea-run cutthroat trout: biology, management, and future conservation. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Corvallis, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  29. Heil N (ed) (2009) National Wild Fish Health Survey - Laboratory Procedures Manual. In: 5.0. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Warm Springs, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Heincke F (1908) Bericht über die untersuchungen der Biologischen Anstalt auf Helgoland zur naturgeschichte der nutzfische (1. April 1905 bis 1. Oktober 1907). In: Salle V von O (ed) Die Beteiligung Deutschlands an der Internationalen Meeresforschung, 4th & 5th edn. Berlin, pp 67–150Google Scholar
  31. Hering DK, Cornwell TJ, Jones KK (2008) Abundance distribution and migratory behavior of coastal cutthroat trout in two lower Columbia River tributaries. Salem, Oregon. https://digital.osl.state.or.us/islandora/object/osl:18262. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  32. Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L et al (2015) Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-representing a decade of land cover change information. American Society for Photogrammetry and. Remote Sens 81:345–354Google Scholar
  33. Hughes RM, Dunham S (2014) Fish passage through urban and rural-residential areas. In: Yeakley JA, Maas-Hebner KG, Hughes RM (eds) Wild salmonids in the urbanizing Pacific northwest. Springer, Corvallis, p 271Google Scholar
  34. Isaak DJ, Young MK, Nagel DE et al (2015) The cold-water climate shield: delineating refugia for preserving salmonid fishes through the 21st century. Glob Chang Biol 21:2540–2553.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jin S, Yang L, Danielson P et al (2013) A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011. Remote Sens Environ 132:159–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson JM (1981) Life histories of anadromous cutthroat with emphasis on migratory behavior. In: Brannon EL, Salo EO (eds) Proceedings of the salmon and trout migratory behavior symposium. School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, pp 123–127Google Scholar
  37. Johnson JR, Zydlewski J, Zydlewski GB et al (2008) Movements of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) in the lower Columbia River: tributary, mainstem and estuary use. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson JR, Baumsteiger J, Zydlewski J et al (2010) Evidence of panmixia between sympatric life history forms of coastal cutthroat trout in two lower Columbia River tributaries. N Am J Fish Manag 30:691–701.  https://doi.org/10.1577/M09-055.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00845.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kéry M (2010) Introduction to Winbugs for ecologists: Bayesian approach to regression, anova, mixed models and related analyses. Am Stat 320 ISBN: 9780123786050Google Scholar
  41. Leeuw AD (1987) Observations on Cutthroat Trout of the Mosquito Lake system, Queen Charlotte Islands. Skeena Fisheries Report #57. Ministry of Environment, Fisheries Branch Smithers, B.CGoogle Scholar
  42. Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol 9:753–760.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040753.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lowry GR (1965) Movement of cutthroat trout, Salmo clarki clarki (Richardson), in three Oregon coastal streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 94:334–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maas-Hebner KG, Hughes RM, Schreck CB (2014) Wild salmonids in the urban environment: lethal and sublethal effects. In: Yeakley JA, Maas-Hebner KG, Hughes RM (eds) Wild salmonids in the urbanizing Pacific northwest. Springer science and business media, LLC, pp 169–182Google Scholar
  45. Maceina MJ, Pereira DL (2007) Recruitment. In: Guy C, Michael B (eds) Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. American fisheries society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 121–185Google Scholar
  46. Minto C, Myers RA, Blanchard W (2008) Survival variability and population density in fish populations. Nature 452:344–347.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06605 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Miserendino ML, Brand C, DiPrinzio CY (2008) Assessing urban impacts on water quality: benthic communities and fish in streams of the Andes Mountains, Patagonia (Argentina). Water Air Soil Pollut 194:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Montgomery DR (2004) King of fish: the thousand-year run of salmon. Perseus Books Group. ISBN: 0813342996Google Scholar
  49. Moring JR, Lantz RL (1975) The Alsea watershed study: effects of logging on the aquatic resources of three headwater streams of the Alsea River, Oregon part I - biological studies. Corvallis, OR. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/59751. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  50. Moscrip AL, Montgomery DR (1997) Urbanization, flood frequency, and salmon abundance in Puget lowland streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33:1289–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03553.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (2000) Guidelines for electrofishing waters containing salmonids listed under the endangered species act. In: NOAA Fish. http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/reference_documents/esa_refs/section4d/electro2000.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  52. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Northington RM, Hershey AE (2006) Effects of stream restoration and wastewater treatment plant effluent on fish communities in urban streams. Freshw Biol 51:1959–1973.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01626.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW) (2012) Aquatic inventories program stream habitat distribution coverages. In: Aquat. Invent. Program, Conserv. Recover. http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ODFW/freshwater/inventory/nworgis.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2015
  55. Oregon Senate Bill 100 (1973) The Oregon Land Conservation and Development Act. https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/senate_bill_100/#.WZ2-fHWGOos. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  56. Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (2013) The Oregon Plan for salmon and watersheds. http://www.oregon.gov/opsw/Pages/index.aspx. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
  57. Ostberg CO, Rodriguez RJ (2004) Bi-parentally inherited species-specific markers identify hybridization between rainbow trout and cutthroat trout subspecies. Mol Ecol Notes 4:26–29.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00554.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pascho RJ, Chase D, McKibben CL (1998) Comparison of the membrane-filtration fluorescent antibody test, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the polymerase chain reaction to detect Renibacterium salmoninarum in salmonid ovarian fluid. J Vet Diagn Investig 10:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Patz J, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T, Foley J (2005) Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 438:310–317.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04188 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2008) Streams in the urban landscape. In: Marzluff JM et al (eds) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, Boston, pp 207–231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_12
  61. Peacock MM, Neville H, Kirchoff VS (2004) Ten species specific microsatellite loci for Lahontan cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi. Mol Ecol Notes 4:557–559.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00731.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peterson JT, Thurow RF, Guzevich JW (2004) An evaluation of multipass electrofishing for estimating the abundance of stream-dwelling salmonids. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:462–475.  https://doi.org/10.1577/03-044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pickett S, Cadenasso M, Grove J et al (2008) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. In: Marzluff JM et al (eds) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, Boston, pp 99–122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_7
  64. Pope KL, Lochmann SE, Young MK (2010) Methods for assessing fish populations. In: Quist MC, Hubert WA (eds) Inland fisheries management in North America, 3rd edition. American fisheries society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 325–351Google Scholar
  65. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput 1:409. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  66. Reeves GH, Everest FH, Sedell JR (1993) Diversity of juvenile anadromous salmonid assemblages in coastal Oregon basins with different levels of timber harvest. Trans Am Fish Soc 122:309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1993)1222.3.CO CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rexroad CE, Coleman RL, Martin AM et al (2001) Thirty-five polymorphic microsatellite markers for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Anim Genet 32:317–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Richter H, Lückstädt C, Focken UL, Becker K (2000) An improved procedure to assess fish condition on the basis of length-weight relationships. Arch Fish Mar Res 48(3):226–235Google Scholar
  69. Rios-Touma B, Prescott C, Axtell S, Kondolf GM (2015) Habitat restoration in the context of watershed prioritization: the ecological performance of urban stream restoration projects in Portland, Oregon. River Res Appl 31:755–766.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rra CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robinson ML, Kirchoff VS, Peacock MM (2009) Characterization of 13 microsatellites for Lahontan cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi) and cross-amplification in six other salmonids. Mol Ecol Resour 9:134–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02367.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Roussel JM, Haro A, Cunjak RA (2000) Field test of a new method for tracking small fishes in shallow rivers using passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1326–1329.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sanders JE, Fryer JL (1980) Renibacterium salmoninarum gen. Nov., sp. nov., the causative agent of bacterial kidney disease in salmonid fishes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Siemer WF, Knuth BA (2001) Effects of fishing education programs on antecedents of responsible environmental behavior. J Environ Educ 32:23–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith CT, Koop BF, Nelson JR (1998) Isolation and characterization of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) microsatellites and their use in other salmonids. Mol Ecol 7(11):1614–1616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Smith CT, Godfrey L, Diggs M, Hawkins DK (2010) Genetic analysis of Cutthroat Trout from Mt. Hood National Forest. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Abernathy Fish Technology Center Final Report. Longview, WAGoogle Scholar
  77. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2014) OpenBUGS user manual. In: OpenBUGS user man. http://www.openbugs.net/Manuals/Manual.html. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  78. Spies IB, Brasier DJ, O’Reilly PTL, Seamons TR, Bentzen P (2005) Development and characterization of novel tetra-, tri-, and dinucleotide microsatellite markers in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol Ecol Notes 5:278–281.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00900.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spromberg JA, Scholz NL (2011) Estimating the future decline of wild Coho Salmon populations resulting from early spawner die-offs in urbanizing watersheds of the Pacific northwest, USA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:648–656.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.219 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Stanfield LW (2012) Reporting on the condition of stream fish communities in the Canadian tributaries of Lake Ontario at various spatial scales. J Great Lakes Res 38:196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stranko SA, Hilderbrand RH, Morgan RP, Staley MW, Becker AJ, Roseberry-Lincoln A, Perry ES, Jacobson PT (2008) Brook trout declines with land cover and temperature changes in Maryland. N Am J Fish Manag 28:1223–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1577/M07-032.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tinus ES, Koloszar JA, Ward DL (2003) Abundance and distribution of fish in city of Portland streams. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Final Report prepared for City of Portland-Bureau of Environmental Services. Portland, OR. 81 pps. http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/oscrp/cri/docs/COPstreamsfinal.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2017
  83. Trotter PC (1989) Coastal cutthroat trout: a life history compendium. Trans Am Fish Soc 118:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. U.S. Census Bureau (2017) QuickFacts population estimates, July 1, 2016 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/portlandcityoregon/PST045216. Accessed 18 Aug 2017
  85. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1965) Anadromous Fish Conservation Act. https://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/anadrom.html. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  86. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2008) National wild fish health survey http://www.fws.gov/wildfishsurvey/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
  87. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2010) National wild fish health survey http://www.fws.gov/wildfishsurvey/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
  88. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), American Fisheries Society (AFS)-Fish Health Section (2007) Standard procedures for aquatic animal health inspections. In: FHS blue book: suggested procedures for the detection and identification of certain finfish and shellfish pathogens, 2007th edn. Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  89. Vu NV, Kalinowski ST (2009) Twelve tetranucleotide microsatellite loci for Westslope cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi (Salmonidae). Conserv Genet Resour 1:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW et al (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723.  https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2005)024
  91. Waples RS (2006) A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv Genet 7:167–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9100-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wegner SJ, Freeman MC, Fowles LA et al (2010) Conservation planning for imperiled aquatic species in an urbanizing environment. Landsc Urban Plan 97:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38(6):1358–1370.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2408641 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wenger SJ, Roy AH, Jackson CR et al (2009) Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:1080–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1899/08-186.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wild Salmon Center (2009) The Pacific Salmon Stronghold Conservation Act of 2009. http://wildsalmoncenter.org/work/science/stronghold-approach/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
  96. Wolter C (2008) Towards a mechanistic understanding of urbanizations’s impacts on fish. In: Marzluff J, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W et al (eds) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and Nature, pp 425–436Google Scholar
  97. Yeakley JA, Maas-Hebner KG, Hughes RM et al (2014) Wild salmonids in the urbanizing Pacific northwest, 1st edn. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zeleňáková M, Purcz P, Hlavatá H, Blišťan P (2015) Climate change in urban versus rural areas. Procedia Eng 119:1171–1180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zydlewski GB, Horton G, Dubreuil T et al (2006) Remote monitoring of fish in small streams. Fisheries 31:492–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zydlewski GB, Zydlewski J, Johnson JR (2009) Patterns of migration and residency in coastal cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii from two tributaries of the lower Columbia River. J Fish Biol 75:203–222.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02280.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Conservation OfficeU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceVancouverUSA
  2. 2.Abernathy Fish Technology CenterU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Lower Columbia River Fish Health CenterU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.City of Portland Bureau of Environmental ServicesPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations