Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 701–714 | Cite as

Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: A case study in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, China

Article
  • 393 Downloads

Abstract

Landscape ecological security pattern (LESP) can effectively safeguard urban ecological security, which is vital for urban sustainable development. Previous studies have not adequately considered the ability to fulfill people’s demand for ecosystem services when identifying sources of LESP. To address this gap, we sought to develop a more comprehensive approach coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to construct LESP for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. We proposed a new evaluation framework integrating ecosystem services importance assessment and landscape connectivity analysis with human ecological demand importance assessment to identify ecological sources. Afterwards, ecological corridors were identified using Minimum Cumulative Resistance model based on sources and resistance surface modified through nighttime light data. Combined with ecological sources and corridors, LESP for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region can be constructed. The ecological sources are mainly located in western Beijing and southwestern Chengde. The ecological source area totals 36,245.50 km2, accounting for 21.26% of the ecological land in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. The ecological corridors cross the whole region, from northeast to southwest, similar to the direction of the Yanshan–Taihang Mountain Chain. All the national nature reserves and 91.4% of the provincial nature reserves are distributed within the LESP. The validity of our methodology is confirmed by the distribution of the nature reserves. This study adds new insights into the methodology of LESP construction, and its results provide information about local ecological characteristics that can provide an important reference for decision-making concerning urban planning and ecological conservation.

Keywords

Landscape ecological security pattern Human ecological demand Ecosystem services Ecological source Ecological corridor Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region 

References

  1. Ala-Hulkko T, Kotavaara O, Alahuhta J, Helle P, Hjort J (2016) Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 66:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aminzadeh B, Khansefid M (2010) A case study of urban ecological networks and a Sustainable City: Tehran's metropolitan area. Urban Ecosyst 13:23–36. doi:10.1007/s11252-009-0101-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asgarian A, Amiri BJ, Sakieh Y (2015) Assessing the effect of green cover spatial patterns on urban land surface temperature using landscape metrics approach. Urban Ecosyst 18:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, Vizcaino P, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E (2016) Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 57:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baudry J, Burel F, Aviron S, Martin M, Ouin A, Pain G, Thenail C (2003) Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? Landsc Ecol 18:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breuste J, Qureshi S (2011) Urban sustainability, urban ecology and the Society for Urban Ecology (SURE). Urban Ecosyst 14:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breuste J, Qureshi S, Li J (2013) Applied urban ecology for sustainable urban environment. Urban Ecosyst 16:675–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carranza ML, D’Alessandro E, Saura S, Loy A (2012) Connectivity providers for semi-aquatic vertebrates: the case of the endangered otter in Italy. Landsc Ecol 27:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cen X, Wu C, Xing X, Fang M, Garang Z, Wu Y (2015) Coupling intensive land use and landscape ecological security for urban sustainability: an integrated socioeconomic data and spatial metrics analysis in Hangzhou City. Sustainability 7:1459–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crossman ND et al (2013) A blueprint for mapping and Modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 4:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deckers B, Kerselaers E, Gulinck H, Muys B, Hermy M (2005) Long-term Spatio-temporal dynamics of a hedgerow network landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Environ Conserv 32:20–29. doi:10.1017/S0376892905001840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Du P, Xia J, Du Q, Luo Y, Tan K (2013) Evaluation of the spatio-temporal pattern of urban ecological security using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Remote Sens 34:848–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elvidge CD, Sutton PC, Ghosh T, Tuttle BT, Baugh KE, Bhaduri B, Bright E (2009) A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Comput Geosci 35:1652–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farley J, Voinov A (2016) Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services. J Environ Manag 183:389-398. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faulkner S (2004) Urbanization impacts on the structure and function of forested wetlands. Urban Ecosyst 7:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao Y, Wu Z, Lou Q, Huang H, Cheng J, Chen Z (2012) Landscape ecological security assessment based on projection pursuit in Pearl River Delta. Environ Monit Assess 184:2307–2319. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2119-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh T, Elvidge CD, Sutton PC, Baugh KE, Ziskin D, Tuttle BT (2010) Creating a global grid of distributed fossil fuel CO2 emissions from nighttime satellite imagery. Energies 3:1895–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24:660–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunawardhana LN, Kazama S, Kawagoe S (2011) Impact of urbanization and climate change on aquifer thermal regimes. Water Resour Manag 25:3247–3276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurrutxaga M, Rubio L, Saura S (2011) Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: a transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landsc Urban Plan 101:310–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutman P (2007) Ecosystem services: foundations for a new rural–urban compact. Ecol Econ 62:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jahun BG, Ibrahim R, Dlamini NS, Musa SM (2015) Review of soil erosion assessment using RUSLE model and GIS. J Biol Agric Healthcare 5:36–47Google Scholar
  25. Jenerette GD, Potere D (2010) Global analysis and simulation of land-use change associated with urbanization. Landsc Ecol 25:657–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang W, Minor ES, Park C-R, Lee D (2015) Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban Forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 18:857–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knaapen JP, Scheffer M, Harms B (1992) Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 23:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, Zong Y (2010) Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landsc Urban Plan 95:16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li H, Li D, Li T, Qiao Q, Yang J, Zhang H (2010a) Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake—Case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China. Ecol Model 221:944–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y, Sun X, Zhu X, Cao H (2010b) An early warning method of landscape ecological security in rapid urbanizing coastal areas and its application in Xiamen, China. Ecol Model 221:2251–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li Y, Li Y, Zhou Y, Shi Y, Zhu X (2012) Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. J Environ Manag 98:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Y, Shi Y, Qureshi S, Bruns A, Zhu X (2014) Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface. Ecol Indic 42:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li F, Ye Y, Song B, Wang R (2015) Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: a case study from Changzhou, China. Ecol Model 318:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin Q, Mao J, Wu J, Li W, Yang J (2016) Ecological security pattern analysis based on InVEST and Least-Cost Path model: a case study of Dongguan Water Village. Sustainability 8:172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma C, Li S, Liu J, Gao Y, Wang Y (2013) Regionalization of ecosystem Services of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area based on SOFM neural network. Prog Geogr 32:1383–1393. doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.09.008 Google Scholar
  36. Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 8:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matlack GR, Monde J (2004) Consequences of low mobility in spatially and temporally heterogeneous ecosystems. J Ecol 92:1025–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonald RI (2009) Ecosystem service demand and supply along the urban-to-rural gradient. Journal of Conservation Planning 5:1–14Google Scholar
  39. Mörtberg U, Haas J, Zetterberg A, Franklin JP, Jonsson D, Deal B (2013) Urban ecosystems and sustainable urban development—Analysing and assessing interacting systems in the Stockholm region. Urban Ecosyst 16:763–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paracchini ML et al (2014) Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol Indic 45:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2006) Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landsc Ecol 21:959–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peng J, Zong M, Yn H, Liu Y, Wu J (2015) Assessing landscape ecological risk in a mining city: a case study in Liaoyuan City, China. Sustainability 7:8312–8334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng J, Chen X, Liu Y, Lü H, Hu X (2016) Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Appl Geogr 74:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peng J, Liu Y, Li T, Wu J (2017) Regional ecosystem health response to rural land use change: a case study in Lijiang City, China. Ecol Indic 72:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Razandi Y, Pourghasemi HR, Neisani NS, Rahmati O (2015) Application of analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and certainty factor models for groundwater potential mapping using GIS. Earth Sci Inf 8:867–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saura S, Torne J (2009) Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ Model Softw 24:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor L, Hochuli DF (2015) Creating better cities: how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning enhance urban residents’ wellbeing. Urban Ecosyst 18:747–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Teng M, Wu C, Zhou Z, Lord E, Zheng Z (2011) Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: a framework integrating priorities and a least-cost path model. Landsc Urban Plan 103:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects 2014: highlights. United Nations Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Jaarsveld A et al (2005) Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem Services at Multiple Scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 360:425–441Google Scholar
  51. Van Oost K, Govers G, Desmet P (2000) Evaluating the effects of changes in landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage. Landsc Ecol 15:577–589. doi:10.1023/A:1008198215674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vergnes A, Kerbiriou C, Clergeau P (2013) Ecological corridors also operate in an urban matrix: a test case with garden shrews. Urban Ecosyst 16:511–525. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0289-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complex 15:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH (2015) Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol Indic 55:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu J (2010) Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landsc Ecol 25:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu J, Zhang L, Peng J, Feng Z, Liu H, He S (2013) The integrated recognition of the source area of the urban ecological security pattern in Shenzhen. Acta Ecol Sinica 33:4125–4133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xie H, Yao G, Liu G (2015) Spatial evaluation of the ecological importance based on GIS for environmental management: a case study in Xingguo County of China. Ecol Indic 51:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xie H, He Y, Xie X (2016) Exploring the factors influencing ecological land change for China's Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region using big data. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.064 Google Scholar
  59. Yu K (1995) Security Patterns in Landscape Planning: With a Case in South China. Dissertation, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu K (1996) Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landsc Urban Plan 36:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu K, Li D, Li N (2006) The evolution of greenways in China. Landsc Urban Plan 76:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang Q, Seto KC (2011) Mapping urbanization dynamics at regional and global scales using multi-temporal DMSP/OLS nighttime light data. Remote Sens Environ 115:2320–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou W, Schwarz K, Cadenasso ML (2010) Mapping urban landscape heterogeneity: agreement between visual interpretation and digital classification approaches. Landsc Ecol 25:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou W, Huang G, Cadenasso ML (2011) Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 102:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou K, Liu Y, Tan R, Song Y (2014) Urban dynamics, landscape ecological security, and policy implications: a case study from the Wuhan area of Central China. Cities 41:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zurlini G et al (2014) Key fundamental aspects for mapping and assessing ecosystem services: predictability of ecosystem service providers at scales from local to global. Annali di Botanica 4:53–63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liqing Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jian Peng
    • 1
  • Yanxu Liu
    • 1
  • Jiansheng Wu
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Architecture, School of Design and EnvironmentNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Key Laboratory for Environmental and Urban Sciences, School of Urban Planning & Design, Shenzhen Graduate SchoolPeking UniversityShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations