Diversity in flowering plants and their characteristics: integrating humans as a driver of urban floral resources
- 699 Downloads
Urban neighborhoods vary in development intensity and in the life style and demographics of their residents. Decisions made by urban residents affect plant communities, their functional characteristics, and the floral resources they provide. We recorded flowers in front-facing yards in 58 neighborhoods in Chicago, IL (USA) and examined patterns in community composition and species turnover between neighborhoods. We investigated how species richness and plant characteristics, including origin, cultivation intent, and life cycle, are affected by neighborhood socioeconomic factors. Urban plant species tended to be perennial, ornamental, and non-native. White clover had the broadest distribution and the highest floral abundance but was not present in several of the highest-income neighborhoods. Although we found 144 morpho-species across neighborhoods, most occurred infrequently. Species turnover was highest for ornamental species and lowest for weedy species, suggesting that intentional plantings are driving beta diversity across the landscape. We found the highest species richness in neighborhoods with intermediate numbers of Hispanic and white residents and with intermediate number of residential lots; neighborhoods with racially or ethnically homogenous populations had fewer plant species. The high frequency of weeds in low-income neighborhoods, the occurrence of certain ornamental plant species in whiter, wealthier communities, and high turnover of species from one neighborhood to another, all suggest a disparity in plant-related ecosystem services across cities. Complexity in urban plantings may be influenced by the suite of perspectives that residents bring towards habitat management. Cultivation sustains a diversity of plants and creates a disparity in plant traits by neighborhood socioeconomics.
KeywordsCity Gardens Non-native Socio-ecological systems Human-environment interactions
The authors thank Dragan Dragas, Sophie Huang, and Tabitha Paroongsup for assistance in data collection and plant identification. This work was funded by NSF Proposal Number: DEB-1120376.
- Clemants S, Moore G (2001) Urban habitats: patterns of species diversity in eight northeastern United States cities. Urban Habit 1:4–16Google Scholar
- Dennis J, Behe BK (2007) Evaluating the role of ethnicity on gardening purchases and satisfaction. HortSci 42:262–267Google Scholar
- Kent RB, Gandia-Ojeda AF (1999) The Puerto Rican Yard-Complex of Lorain, Ohio. In Yearbook. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, 45–60. Conference of Latin Americanist GeographersGoogle Scholar
- Knapp S, Dinsmore L, Fissore C, Hobbie SE, Jakobsdottir I, Kattge J, King JY, Klotz S, McFadden JP, Cavender-Bares J (2012) Phylogenetic and functional characteristics of household yard floras and their changes along an urbanization gradient. Ecology 93:S83–S98. doi: 10.1890/11-0392.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lumley T. using Fortran code by Alan Miller (2009) leaps: regression subset selection. R package version 2.9. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaps
- Minor ES, Belaire JA, Davis A, Franco M, Lin M (2016) Socioeconomics and neighbor mimicry drive yard and neighborhood vegetation patterns. In: Francis RA, Millington JDA, Chadwick MA (eds) Urban landscape ecology: science, policy and practice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar