Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Two-sided edge responses of avian communities in an urban landscape

Abstract

Impacts of habitat edges on wildlife populations have received considerable attention, yet few researchers have quantified changes in animal community structure on both sides of an interface between distinct habitats. To gain a better understanding of the ways in which species-specific responses scale up to produce community patterns across habitat boundaries, we examined the response of avian communities to forest-suburb edges in northeastern Illinois, USA. We surveyed bird assemblages using replicated point-transects (n = 21) that crossed boundaries between remnant forest patches and suburban residential areas in order to compare differences in community composition, species distributions, and densities. Forest and suburban bird communities were distinct, and community composition changed with distance-from-edge in forests but not suburbs. Abundances of many species that were common in the forest increased with distance-from-edge in the forest, whereas numbers of common species in the suburbs were largely unaffected by distance-from-edge. Using a new metric that we termed “tolerance,” we found many forest species avoided the edge and suburbs, and suburban species were present near the edge but did not venture far into forest. Overall, distance to the forest-suburb boundary was more influential in structuring avian communities in the forest. Some species of conservation concern crossed edges into the suburbs, suggesting that management activities may improve suburban biodiversity. Many other imperiled forest species, however, will only be retained in urban environments through the protection of forest interior habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

  2. Anderson MJ (2005) PERMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand. http://stat.auckland.ac.nz. Accessed 9 Nov 2011

  3. Báldi A (1999) Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a reedbed in Hungary. Biodivers Conserv 8:1697–1706

  4. Beissinger SR, Osborne DR (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83

  5. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques. Elsevier Ltd., London

  6. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519

  7. Campi MJ, Mac Nally R (2001) Birds on edge: avian assemblages along forest-agricultural boundaries of central Victoria, Australia. Anim Conserv 4:121–132

  8. Catterall CP, Green RJ, Jones DN (1989) Occurrence of birds in relation to plants in a subtropical city. Aust Wildlife Res 16:289–305

  9. Catterall CP, Green RJ, Jones DN (1991) Habitat use by birds across a forest-suburb interface in Brisbane: implications for corridors. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature conservation: the role of corridors. Surrey and Beatty and Sons Pty Ltd, Chipping Norton, pp 247–258

  10. Catterall CP, Cousin JA, Piper S, Johnson G (2010) Long-term dynamics of bird diversity in forest and suburb: decay, turnover or homogenization? Divers Distrib 16:559–570

  11. Chicago Wilderness (2014) The Chicago Wilderness region. Chicago Wilderness, Chicago, IL. http://www.chicagowilderness.org/who-we-are/chicago-wilderness-map/. Accessed 18 March 2014

  12. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

  13. Fernández-Juricic E (2000) Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol 14:513–521

  14. Fernández-Juricic E (2001) Avian spatial segregation at edges and interiors of urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Biodivers Conserv 10:1303–1316

  15. Flaspohler DJ, Temple SA, Rosenfield RN (2001) Species-specific edge effects on nest success and breeding bird density in a forested landscape. Ecol Appl 11:32–46

  16. Fonseca CR, Joner F (2007) Two-sided edge effect studies and the restoration of endangered ecosystems. Restor Ecol 15:613–619

  17. Gates JE, Gysel LW (1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59:871–883

  18. Germaine SS, Vessey SH, Capen DE (1997) Effects of small forest openings on the breeding bird community in a Vermont hardwood forest. Condor 99:708–718

  19. Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:213–227

  20. Hagan JM III, Johnston DW (1992) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA

  21. Hanowski JM, Niemi GJ (1995) A comparison of on- and off-road bird counts: do you need to go off road to count birds accurately? J Field Ornithol 66:469–483

  22. Hodgson P, French K, Major RE (2007) Avian movement across abrupt ecological edges: differential responses to housing density in an urban matrix. Landscape Urban Plan 79:266–272

  23. Hutto RL, Hejl SJ, Kelly JF, Pletschet SM (1994) A comparison of bird detection rates derived from on-road versus off-road point counts in northern Montana. In: Ralph CJ, Sauer JF, Droege S (eds) Monitoring bird population trends by point counts, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, USDA, Albany, pp 104–111

  24. Ikin K, Knight E, Lindemayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD (2013) The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Divers Distrib 19:294–306

  25. Johnston VR (1947) Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois. Condor 49:45–53

  26. Johnston RF (2001) Synanthropic birds of North America. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 49–67

  27. King DI, Griffin CR, DeGraaf RM (1997) Effect of clear-cut borders on distribution and abundance of forest birds in northern New Hampshire. Wilson Bull 109:239–245

  28. Kristan WB, Lynam AJ, Price MV, Rotenberry JT (2003) Alternative causes of edge-abundance relationships in birds and small mammals of California coastal sage scrub. Ecography 26:29–44

  29. Laurance WF (2004) Do edge effects occur over large spatial scales? Trends Ecol Evol 15:134–135

  30. Lidicker WZ (1999) Responses of mammals to habitat edges: an overview. Landscape Ecol 14:333–343

  31. Loss SR, Ruiz MO, Brawn JD (2009) Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape. Biol Conserv 142:2578–2585

  32. McCune B, Mefford J (2011) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 6. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

  33. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization, as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

  34. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337

  35. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

  36. Ott RL, Longnecker M (2001) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis, 5th edn. Thomson Learning, Inc., Pacific Grove

  37. Pereira HM, Daily GC, Roughgarden J (2004) A framework for assessing the relative vulnerability of species to land-use change. Ecol Appl 14:730–742

  38. Poole A (2005) The birds of North America online. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/. Accessed 9 Nov 2011

  39. Powell LA (2007) Approximating variance of demographic parameters using the delta method: a reference for avian biologists. Condor 109:949–954

  40. Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70:840–852

  41. Ries L, Sisk TD (2004) A predictive model of edge effects. Ecology 85:2917–2926

  42. Ries L, Sisk TD (2010) What is an edge species? The implications of sensitivity to habitat edges. Oikos 119:1636–1642

  43. Ries L, Fletcher RJ Jr, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 35:491–522

  44. Ruth JM (2006) Partners in Flight—U.S. Website. http://www.partnersinflight.org/. Accessed 5 March 2013

  45. SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary

  46. Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH (2010) Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience 60:199–208

  47. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19

  48. U.S. Census Bureau (2012) 2012 population estimates. http://www.census.gov/popest/data/metro/totals/2012/tables/CBSA-EST2012-02.csv. Accessed 15 Jan 2014

  49. Villard A (1998) On forest-interior species, edge avoidance, area sensitivity, and dogmas in avian conservation. Auk 115:801–805

  50. Walting JL, Nowakowski AJ, Donnelly MA, Orrock JL (2010) Meta-analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitats. Global Ecol Biogeogr 20:209–217

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Jonathon Baldwin Turner Graduate Fellowship from the University of Illinois College of Agriculture, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, and by the University of Illinois Research Board. We thank J. Bocek and E. Zeller for their assistance in the collection of bird and habitat data, as well as P. Hoyem, S. Hume, and M. E. Phelan for providing housing accommodations in Chicago. We are especially grateful to members of the Miller lab and two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript, as well as D. Schneider who provided guidance in the application of statistical methods.

Author information

Correspondence to Jason D. Fischer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, S.C., Fischer, J.D. & Miller, J.R. Two-sided edge responses of avian communities in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 18, 539–551 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0418-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Avian communities
  • Edges
  • Species richness
  • Tolerance
  • Urbanization