Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 613–623 | Cite as

Movement and habitat use of the snapping turtle in an urban landscape

  • Travis J. Ryan
  • William E. Peterman
  • Jessica D. Stephens
  • Sean C. Sterrett
Article

Abstract

In order to effectively manage urban habitats, it is important to incorporate the spatial ecology and habitat use of the species utilizing them. Our previous studies have shown that the distribution of upland habitats surrounding a highly urbanized wetland habitat, the Central Canal (Indianapolis, IN, USA) influences the distribution of map turtles (Graptemys geographica) and red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta) during both the active season and hibernation. In this study we detail the movements and habitat use of another prominent member of the Central Canal turtle assemblage, the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. We find the same major upland habitat associations for C. serpentina as for G. geographica and T. scripta, despite major differences in their activity (e.g., C. serpentina do not regularly engage in aerial basking). These results reinforce the importance of recognizing the connection between aquatic and surrounding terrestrial habitats, especially in urban ecosystems.

Keywords

Chelydra serpentina Radiotelemetry Riparian Snapping turtle Spatial ecology Urbanization 

References

  1. Bodie JR (2001) Stream and riparian management for freshwater turtles. J Environ Man 62:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks RJ, Brown GP, Galbraith DA (1991) Effects of a sudden increase in natural mortality of adults on a population of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). Can J Zool 69:1314–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown GP (1992) Thermal and spatial ecology of northern population of snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). MSc. Thesis, University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke VJ, Gibbons JW (1995) Terrestrial buffer zones and wetland conservation: a case study of freshwater turtles in a Carolina Bay. Cons Biol 9:1365–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cadi A, Joly P (2003) Competition for basking places between the endangered European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Can J Zool 81:1292–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Congdon JD, Dunham AE, van Loben Sels RC (1993) Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Cons Biol 7:826–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Congdon JD, Dunham AE, van Loben Sels RC (1994) Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Amer Zool 34:397–408Google Scholar
  8. Conner CA, Douthitt BA, Ryan TJ (2005) Descriptive ecology of a turtle assemblage in an urban landscape. Amer Midl Nat 153:428–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DonnerWright DM, Bozek MA, Probst JR, Anderson EM (1999) Responses of turtle assemblage to environmental gradients in the St. Croix River in Minnesota and Wisconsin, U.S.A. Can J Zool 77:989–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ernst CH, Lovich JE (2009) Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  11. Feuer RC (1971) Ecological factors in success and dispersal of the snapping turtle Chelydra serpentina (Linnaeus). Bull Phil Herpetol Soc 19:3–14Google Scholar
  12. Froese AD (1974) Aspects of space use in the common snapping turtle, Chelydra s. serpentina. Dissertation, University of TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  13. Froese AD, Burghardt GM (1975) A dense natural population of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra s. serpentina). Herpetologica 31:204–209Google Scholar
  14. Galbraith DA, Bishop CA, Brooks RJ, Simser WL, Lampman KP (1988) Factors affecting the density of populations of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina serpentina). Can J Zool 66:1233–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs JP, Steen DA (2005) Trends in sex ratios of turtles in the United States: implications of road mortality. Cons Biol 19:552–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon DM, MacColluch RD (1980) An investigation of the ecology of the map turtle, Graptemys geographica (Le Sueur), in the northern part of its range. Can J Zool 58:2210–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant BW, Middendorf G, Colgan MJ, Ahmad H, Vogel MB (2011) Ecology of urban amphibians and reptiles: urbanophiles, urbanophobes, and the urbanoblivious. In: Niemela J (ed) Urban ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Biosci 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Bai JWX, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammer DA (1969) Parameters of a marsh snapping turtle population Lacreek Refuge, South Dakota. J Wildlife Man 33:995–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haxton T (2000) Road mortality of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina, in central Ontario during their nesting period. Can Field-Nat 114:106–110Google Scholar
  22. Hays KA, Mcbee K (2010) Population demographics of red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta) from Tar Creek Superfund Site. J Herpetol 44:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joyal LA, McCollough M, Hunter ML (2001) Landscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in southern Maine. Cons Biol 15:1755–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klemens MW (1993) Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. Bulletin 112 State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Hartford, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  25. Kobayashi R, Hasegawa M, Miyashita T (2006) Home range and habitat use of the exotic turtle Chelydra serpentina in the Inbanuma Basin, Chiba Prefecture, Central Japan. Curr Herpetol 25:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linck MH, DePari JA, Butler BO, Graham TE (1989) Nesting behavior of the turtle, Emydoidea blandingii, in Massachusetts. J Herpetol 23:442–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindeman PV (1999) Aggressive interaction during basking among four species of emydid turtles. J Herpetol 33:214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lovich JE (1995) Turtles. In: LaRoe ET, Farris GS, Puckett CE, Doran PD, Mac MJ (eds) Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey, Washington, DC, p 902Google Scholar
  29. Major PD (1975) Density of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina in western West Virginia. Herpetologica 31:332–335Google Scholar
  30. Marchand MN, Litvaitis JA (2004a) Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Cons Biol 18:758–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchand MN, Litvaitis JA (2004b) Effects of landscape composition, habitat features, and nest distribution on predation rates of simulated turtle nests. Biol Cons 117:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Cons 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meeks RL, Ultsch GR (1990) Overwintering behavior of snapping turtles. Copeia 3:880–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Minton SA (2001) Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. The Indiana Academy of Science, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell JC (1988) Population ecology and life histories of the freshwater turtles Chrysemys picta and Sternotherus odoratus in an urban lake. Herpetol Monographs 2:40–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naiman RJ, Decamps H, McClain ME (2005) Riparia: ecology, conservation and management of streamside communities. Elsevier Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  37. Obbard ME, Brooks RJ (1980) Nesting migrations of the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). Herpetologica 36:158–162Google Scholar
  38. Obbard ME, Brooks RJ (1981) A radio-telemetry and mark-recapture study of activity in the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. Copeia 1981:630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterman WE, Ryan TJ (2009) Basking behavior of emydid turtles (Chrysemys picta, Graptemys geographica, and Trachemys scripta) in an urban landscape. Northeastern Nat 16:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pettit KE, Bishop CA, Brooks RJ (1995) Home range and movements of the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina serpentina, in a coastal wetlands of Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, Canada. Can Field-Nat 109:192–200Google Scholar
  41. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pluto TG, Bellis ED (1988) Seasonal and annual movements of riverine map turtles, Graptemys geographica. J Herpetol 22:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Punzo F (1975) Studies on the feeding behavior, diet, nesting habits and temperature relationships of Chelydra serpentina osceola (Chelonia: Chelydridae). J Herpetol 9:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rees M, Roe JH, Georges A (2009) Life in the suburbs: behavior and survival of a freshwater turtle in response to drought and urbanization. Biol Cons 142:3172–3181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rizkalla CE, Swihart RK (2006) Community structure and differential responses of aquatic turtles to agriculturally induced habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 21:1361–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roe JH, Georges A (2007) Heterogeneous wetland complexes, buffer zones, and travel corridors: Landscape management for freshwater reptiles. Biol Cons 135:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ryan TJ, Conner CA, Douthitt BA, Sterrett SC, Salsbury CM (2008) Movement and habitat use of two aquatic turtles (Graptemys geographica and Trachemys scripta) in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 11:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saumure RA, Bider JR (1998) Impact of agricultural development on a population of wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta) in southern Québec, Canada. Chelonian Cons Biol 3:37–45Google Scholar
  49. Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2003) Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Cons Biol 17:1219–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Soule ME (1991) Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: Guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. J Amer Planning Assoc 57:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Souza FL, Abe AS (2000) Feeding ecology, density and biomass of the freshwater turtle, Phrynops geoffroanus, inhabiting a polluted urban river in south-eastern Brazil. J Zool 252:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steen DA, Gibbs JP (2004) Effects of roads on the structure of freshwater turtle populations. Cons Biol 18:1143–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steen DA, Sterrett SC, Heupel AM, Smith LL (2010) Common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina, movements near the southeastern extent of its range. Georgia J Sci 68:196–201Google Scholar
  54. Sterrett SC, Smith LL, Golladay SW, Schweitzer SH, Maerz JC (2011) The conservation implications of riparian land use on river turtles. Animal Cons 14:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steyermark AC, Finkler MS, Brooks RJ (2008) Biology of the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  56. Vogt RC (1981) Food partitioning in three sympatric species of map turtle, genus Graptemys. Amer Midl Nat 105:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White D Jr, Moll D (1992) Restricted diet of the common map turtle Graptemys geographica in a Missouri stream. Southwest Nat 37:317–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis J. Ryan
    • 1
  • William E. Peterman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jessica D. Stephens
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sean C. Sterrett
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Center for Urban EcologyButler UniversityIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  4. 4.Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations