Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 911–925 | Cite as

Plant diversity and distribution in urban domestic gardens and apartments in Bangalore, India

  • Madhumitha Jaganmohan
  • Lionel Sujay Vailshery
  • Divya Gopal
  • Harini Nagendra
Article

Abstract

Although urban domestic gardens hold great significance for biodiversity support in cities, these habitats have been relatively insufficiently studied, especially in developing country contexts. This paper assesses the composition, diversity, density and distribution of plant vegetation in urban domestic gardens in the rapidly expanding south Indian city of Bangalore. Overall species diversity is high, with 1,668 trees from 91 species, as well as 192 species of herbs and shrubs encountered from a total sample of 328 urban single domestic gardens and shared apartment gardens distributed across the city. The majority of species were uncommon, found in less than 5 % of all sampled locations. A high proportion of about 30 % of all species had uses as food or as spices, medicinal properties, and/or religious significance. In general, large shared apartment gardens and single domestic gardens had a greater number of trees with larger size, and greater tree and herb/shrub diversity compared to small shared apartment gardens and small to moderate sized single domestic gardens. Shared apartment gardens tended to harbor relatively distinct sets of species, especially trees, palms and plants with largely ornamental significance, while single domestic gardens contained a greater proportion of flowering and medicinal plants used in daily worship, as well as fruit bearing and spice bearing plants and trees. Residents observed a wide range of other animal and insect species in their gardens, but also indicated a decrease in wildlife biodiversity over time. The majority of residents observed some cultural practices associated with feeding of urban wildlife and insects including the provision of rice and water for birds, and of sugar for ants. The results of this research provide a comprehensive description of plant diversity and distribution in single domestic gardens and shared apartment gardens of different sizes, which can be very important for citizen groups, planners and administrators working towards urban planting and greening in the south Indian city of Bangalore. They also supplement the extremely limited information currently available on urban domestic gardens outside of cities in the west.

Keywords

Cities Green spaces India Urban biodiversity Urban ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Stockholm Resilience Center, and a Ramanujan Fellowship from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India to HN. We thank Prakhar Arora for assistance with field sampling.

References

  1. Albuquerque UP, Andrade LHC, Caballero J (2005) Structure and floristics of homegardens in Northeastern Brazil. J Arid Environ 62:491–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aminzadeh B, Khansefid M (2010) A case study of urban ecological networks and a sustainable city: Tehran’s metropolitan area. Urban Ecosyst 13:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanckaert I, Swennen RL, Flores MP, López RR, Saade L (2004) Floristic composition, plant uses and management practices in homegardens of San Rafael Coxcátlan Valley of Tehuacán-Cuicatlán, Mexico. J Arid Environ 57:39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botkin DB, Beveridge CE (1997) Cities as environments. Urban Ecosyst 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlain DE, Gough S, Vaughan H, Vickery JA, Appleton GF (2007) Determinants of bird species richness in public green spaces: capsule bird species richness showed consistent positive correlations with site area and rough grass. Bird Study 54:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc Urban Plan 68:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cilliers S, Siebert S, Davoren E, Lubbe R (2011) Social aspects of urban ecology in developing countries, with an emphasis on urban domestic gardens. In M. Richter, E. Weiland (Eds.), Applied urban ecology: A global framework. Wiley-Blackwell, Chennai, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Colding J, Lundberg J, Folke C (2006) Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35:237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006a) Comparing the characteristics of front and back domestic gardens in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 78:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006b) Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biol Conserv 133:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Loram A, Irvine KN, Sims V, Gaston KJ (2009) A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol Conserv 142:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doody BJ, Sullivan JJ, Meurk CD, Stewart GH, Perkins HC (2010) Urban realities: the contribution of residential gardens to the conservation of urban forest remnants. Biodivers Conserv 19:1385–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Souza R, Nagendra H (2011) Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: the Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environ Manage 47:840–850Google Scholar
  15. Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  16. Dunn RR, Gavin MC, Sanchez MC, Solomon JN (2006) The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conserv Biol 20:1814–1816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J (2001) A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers Conserv 10:2023–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ (2008) Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers Distrib 14:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galluzzi G, Eyzaguirre P, Negri V (2010) Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:3635–3654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gonzalez-Garcia A, Sal AG (2008) Private urban greenspaces or ‘Patios’ as a key element in the urban ecology of tropical central America. Hum Ecol 36:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kabir ME, Webb EL (2008) Can homegardens conserve biodiversity in Bangladesh? Biotropica 40:95–103Google Scholar
  23. Kendall D, Williams NSG, Williams KJH (2011) A cultivated environment: exploring the global distribution of plants in gardens, parks and streetscapes. Urban Ecosyst. doi: 10.1007/s11252-011-0215-2
  24. Khera N, Mehta V, Sabata BC (2009) Interrelationships of birds and habitat features in urban greenspaces in Delhi, India. Urban For Urban Green 8:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkpatrick JB, Daniels GD, Zagorski T (2007) Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 79:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirkpatrick J, Daniels G, Davison A (2009) An antipodean test of spatial contagion in front garden character. Landsc Urban Plan 93:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurz T, Baudains C (2010) Biodiversity in the front yard: an investigation of landscape preference in a domestic urban context. Environ Behav, published online November 7 2011, doi: 10.1177/0013916510385542
  28. Lerman SB, Warren PS (2011) The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people. Ecol Appl 21:1327–1339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc Ecol 22:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lubbe CS, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS (2010) Political legacy of South Africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban domestic gardens along a socio-economic gradient. Sci Res Essays 5:2900–2910Google Scholar
  31. Luck GW, Smallbone LT, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosyst 12:604–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathieu R, Freeman C, Aryal J (2007) Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery. Landsc Urban Plan 81:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagendra H (2010) Maps, lakes and citizens. Sem India 613:19–23Google Scholar
  35. Nagendra H, Gopal D (2010) Street trees in Bangalore: density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban For Urban Green 9:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagendra H, Gopal D (2011) Tree diversity, distribution, history and change in urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 14:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nair J (2005) The promise of the metropolis: Bangalore’s twentieth century. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  38. Oleyar MD, Greve AI, Withey JC, Bjorn AM (2008) An integrated approach to evaluating urban forest functionality. Urban Ecosyst 11:289–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh VS, Pandey DN, Chaudhry P (2010) Urban forests and open green spaces: lessons for Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. RSPCB Occasional Paper No. 1/2010, Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board, Rajasthan, India. http://210.212.99.115/rpcb/RSPCB-OP-1-2010.pdf. Accessed on 23 February 2010
  40. Smith RM, Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2006a) Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biol Conserv 129:312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith RM, Warren PH, Thompson K, Gaston KJ (2006b) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodivers Conserv 15:2415–2438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2006c) Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. Biodivers Conserv 15:2515–2545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Introduction to biostatistics, 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Sperling CD, Lortie CJ (2010) The importance of urban backgardens on plant and invertebrate recruitment: a field microcosm experiment. Urban Ecosyst 13:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Subrahmanya MHB (2007) City profile Bangalore. Cities 24:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Troy AR, Grove JM, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2007) Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environ Manag 40:394–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madhumitha Jaganmohan
    • 1
  • Lionel Sujay Vailshery
    • 1
  • Divya Gopal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Harini Nagendra
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC)Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations