Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 545–557 | Cite as

Ecosystem services provided by urban spontaneous vegetation

  • Sarah L. Robinson
  • Jeremy T. Lundholm
Article

Abstract

Spontaneous vegetation colonizes large areas in and around cities. These unmanaged areas are considered to have low economic value or indicate dereliction, but recent research suggests that these can contribute valuable ecosystem services. This study evaluates indicators of ecosystem services in three habitats: urban spontaneous vegetation (USV), managed lawns, and semi-natural urban forest, in Halifax, Nova Scotia. USV had higher indicator values for habitat provisioning (plant species diversity, invertebrate abundance and taxonomic diversity) than the other habitats. Indicators of climatic regulatory services (albedo and leaf area index) in USV were similar to those in lawn habitats. Organic carbon content of the soils, an indicator of carbon storage, was lowest in USV but only marginally lower than in lawns. Standing biomass, an indicator of production services, was lowest in USV but lawn production may have been overestimated. While USV sites are usually transitory components of the urban landscape, they deserve further consideration due to their provision of ecosystem services, in some cases to a greater extent than conventionally valued urban habitats.

Keywords

Pollinators Habitat provisioning Biomass Species richness Wasteland Brownfield 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Scott MacIvor and Chris Majka for their assistance with insect identification, and Crystal Hillier and Sarah DesRocher for their help with the field sampling. Funding was provided by NSERC (Canadian Graduate Scholarship to SR; Discovery Grant to JL).

Supplementary material

11252_2012_225_Fig1_ESM.gif (300 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1

Map of urban habitat study sites in Halifax, Nova Scotia. (Urban spontaneous vegetation: red; lawns: yellow; forest: green) (GIF 300 kb)

11252_2012_225_MOESM1_ESM.tif (19.4 mb)
High resolution image file (TIFF 19.3 mb)
11252_2012_225_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (62 kb)
Online Resource 2-1 List of invertebrate taxa sampled by sweep netting in urban habitats (PDF 62 kb)
11252_2012_225_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
Online Resource 2-2 Lists of invertebrate taxa sampled in pitfall traps and sweep netting in urban habitats (PDF 82.9 kb)

References

  1. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy 70:295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, Pullin A, Rushton S, Austin K, Small E, Wood B, Wadsworth R, Sanderson R, Thompson K (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360:196–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askew AP (2003) Leaf area measurement, Version 1.3. University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlantic Geoscience Society (AGS) (1994) Geology Map of Nova Scotia. Land Registration and Information Services & Province of Nova Scotia Department of Supply and Services, Nova Scotia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry RG, Chorley RJ (1992) Atmosphere, weather and climate. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts AK, Ball JH (1997) Albedo over the boreal forest. J Geophys Res 102:901–909Google Scholar
  7. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Botkin DB, Simpson LG (1990) Biomass of the North American boreal forest. Biogeochemistry 9:161–174Google Scholar
  9. Brandes D (1995) The flora of old town centres in Europe. In: Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A (eds) Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Brockerhoff EG, Jones DC, Kimberley MO, Suckling DM, Donaldson T (2006) Nationwide survey for invasive wood-boring and bark beetles (Coleoptera) using traps baited with pheromones and kairomones. Forest Ecol Manage 228:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bullock P, Gregory PJ (1991) Soils in the urban environment. Blackwell, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canadian Biodiversity Information Network (CBIN) (2005) Urban Biodiversity. http://www.cbin.ec.gc.ca/enjeux-issues/urbain-urban.cfm?lang=eng Accessed 1 May 2008
  13. Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ, Roulston TH, Williams NM (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 16:632–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen JM, Pavlic G, Brown L et al (2002) Derivation and validation of Canada-wide coarse-resolution leaf area index maps using high-resolution satellite imagery and ground measurements. Remote Sens Environ 80:165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham MA, Snyder E, Yonkin D, Ross M, Elsen T (2008) Accumulation of deicing salts in soils in an urban environment. Urban Ecosystems 11:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Currie BA, Bass B (2008) Estimates of air pollution mitigation with green plants and green roofs using the UFORE model. Urban Ecosystems 11:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darlington A (1969) Ecology of refuse tips. Heinemann Educational, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. De Sousa CA (2006) Urban brownfields redevelopment in Canada: the role of local government. Can Geogr 50:392–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimoudi A, Nikolopoulou M (2003) Vegetation in the urban environment: microclimatic analysis and benefits. Energ Buildings 35:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Effland WR, Pouyat RV (1997) The genesis, classification and mapping of soils in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emmett BA, Beier C, Estiarte M, Tietema A, Kristensen HL, Williams D, Penuelas J, Schmidt I, Sowerby A (2004) The response of soil processes to climate change: results from manipulation studies of shrublands across an environmental gradient. Ecosystems 7:625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. English Partnerships (2006) The Economic impact of recycling brownfield land. English Partnerships, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Eyre MD, Luff ML, Woodward JC (2003) Beetles (Coleoptera) on brownfield sites in England: an important conservation resource? J Insect Conserv 7:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freedman B, Love S, O’Neil B (1996) Tree species composition, structure, and carbon storage in stands of urban forest of varying character in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Can Field Nat 110:675–682Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gödde M, Richarz N, Walter B (1995) Habitat conservation and development in the city of Dusseldorf (Germany). In: Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A (eds) Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning. SPB Academic Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrison C, Davies G (2002) Conserving biodiversity that matters: practitioners’ perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. J Environ Manage 65:95–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8788–8792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houldcroft CJ, Grey WMF, Barnsley M, Taylor CM, Los SO, North PRJ (2009) New vegetation albedo parameters and global fields of soil background albedo derived from MODIS for use in a climate model. J Hydrometeorol 10:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) IPCC’s Third Assessment Report. Annex B useful glossary of terms. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/glossary/tar-ipcc-terms-en.pdf Accessed 1 December 2010
  32. Jehlik V (1986) The vegetation of railways in northern Bohemia. Academia, Pub. House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  33. Kattwinkel M, Biedermann R, Kleyer M (2011) Temporary conservation for urban biodiversity. Biol Conserv 144:2335–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klimeš L (1987) Succession in road bank vegetation. Folia Geobot 22:435–440Google Scholar
  35. Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorenz K, Lal R (2009) Biogeochemical C and N cycles in urban soils. Environ Int 35:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lund AC (1974) Analyses of urban plant communities of Atlanta. Dissertation, Emory University, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Lundholm JT, Marlin A (2006) Habitat origins and microhabitat preferences of urban plant species. Urban Ecosystems 9:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacDougall JI, Cann DB (1963) Soil survey of Halifax County, Nova Scotia. Report No. 13, N.S. Soil Survey, Truro, Nova ScotiaGoogle Scholar
  40. MacIvor JS, Lundholm JT (2011) Insect species composition and diversity on intensive green roofs and adjacent level-ground habitats. Urban Ecosystems 14(2):225–241. doi: 10.1007/s11252-010-0149-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Majka CG, Robinson S (2009) Hyperaspis and Brachiacantha (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): two poorly known genera of native lady beetles in the Maritime Provinces. Journal of the Acadian Entomological Society 5:3–11Google Scholar
  42. Matteson KC, Langellotto GA (2010) Determinates of inner city butterfly and bee species richness. Urban Ecosystems 13:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Milesi C, Running SW, Elvidge CD, Dietz JB, Tuttle BT, Nemani RR (2004) Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States. Environ Manage 36:426–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nowak DJ (1994) Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project, Chapter 2: Urban Forest Structure. In: McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA (eds) The State of Chicago’s Urban Forest. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. Radnor, PAGoogle Scholar
  46. Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 116:381–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nowak DJ, McHale PJ, Ibarra M, Crane D, Stevens J, Luley C (1998) Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution. In: Gryning S, Chaumerliac N (eds) Air pollution modeling and its application XII. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Pouyat RV, Russell-Anelli J, Yesilonis ID, Groffman PM (2003) Soil carbon in urban forest ecosystems. In: Kimble JM et al (eds) The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  49. Pouyat RV, Yesilonis ID, Nowak DJ (2006) Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. J Environ Qual 35:1566–1575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson SL (2011) Ecosystem functions and plant community structure of urban spontaneous vegetation. MSc thesis, Dalhousie University, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  51. Simons R (1998) Turning brownfields into greenbacks. Urban Land Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  52. Small EC, Sadler JP, Telfer MG (2003) Carabid beetle assemblages on urban derelict sites in Birmingham, UK. J Insect Conserv 6:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith RM, Warren PH, Thompson K, Gaston KJ (2006) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodivers Conserv 15:2415–2438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strauss B, Biedermann R (2006) Urban brownfields as temporary habitats: driving forces for the diversity of phytophagus insects. Ecography 29:928–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sukopp H, Blume H, Kunick W (1979) The soil, flora, and vegetation of Berlin’s waste lands. In: Laurie IC (ed) Nature in cities. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner K, Lefler L, Freedman B (2005) Plant communities of selected urbanized areas of Halifax, Nova Scotia. Landscape Urban Plan 71:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weber MG, Flannigan MD (1997) Canadian boreal forest ecosystem structure and function in a changing climate: impact on fire regimes. Environ Rev 5:145–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiegert RG, Evans FC (1964) Primary production and the disappearance of dead vegetation on an old field in southeastern Michigan. Ecology 45:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atlantic Canada Conservation Data CentreNew BrunswickCanada
  2. 2.Biology Department/Environmental Studies ProgramSaint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations