Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 653–666

A comparison of Mediterranean Gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) populations in two temperate zone urban habitats

  • L. Brooke Stabler
  • Whittney L. Johnson
  • Kenneth J. Locey
  • Paul A. Stone


Urban ecosystems represent unique habitats that might be more or less suitable than natural systems for many species. The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus is a synanthropic species that has successfully colonized many urban and suburban areas outside its natural range. In the United States, H. turcicus has been found predominantly in southern states on exterior surfaces of buildings. We compared population density, demographics, and extent of dispersal of populations of H. turcicus at two anthropogenic sites in a temperate region of the United States. The University of Central Oklahoma (UCO) had higher building density and greater cover by anthropogenic surfaces and the Oklahoma City Zoo (ZOO) had lower building density and greater cover by vegetation. Mark and recapture sampling was conducted at UCO from 2006 to 2007 and during 2008 at ZOO. The sizes of the populations at the two sites were estimated using the Schnabel method and population densities were calculated using those estimates. Age class of captured animals, sex of adults, and gravid status of adult females were determined at both sites. We assumed that greater exterior wall surface area of individual buildings at UCO and greater land cover by anthropogenic surfaces might 1) reduce population density and 2) facilitate dispersal there relative to the ZOO. Population sizes and density in animals per ha of land and building cover and demographics were similar at the two sites. Population density per ha of building exterior wall area was higher at ZOO than at UCO. The higher density of animals on buildings, lower proportion of subadults in the population and lower maximum dispersal distance at ZOO suggest that successful diffusion dispersal might be limited at that site relative to UCO.


Density Demographics Dispersal Exotic Synanthropic 


  1. Andow DA, Kareiva PM, Levin SA, Okubo A (1990) Spread of invading organisms. Landsc Ecol 4:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boughton DA (2000) The dispersal system of a butterfly; a test of source-sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis. Am Nat 156:131–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown JH, Lomolino MV (1998) Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ 5:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capula M, Luiselli L (1994) Trophic niche overlap in sympatric Tarentola mauritanica and Hemidactylus turcicus: a preliminary study. Herpetol J 4:24–25Google Scholar
  6. Conant R, Collins JT (1991) A field guide to reptiles and amphibians of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dallman PR (1998) Plant life in the world’s Mediterranean climates. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis WK (1974) The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus in Texas. J Herpetol 8:77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster DR (1992) Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80:753–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gomez-Zlatar P, Moulton MP, Franz R (2006) Microhabitat use by introduced Hemidactylus turcicus (Mediterranean Geckos) in North Central Florida. Southeast Nat 5:425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hitchcock MA, McBrayer LD (2006) Thermoregulation in nocturnal ectotherms: seasonal and intraspecific variation in the Mediterranean Gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus). J Herpetol 40:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horn HS (1983) Some theories about dispersal. In: Swingland IR, Greenwood PJ (eds) The ecology of animal movement. Oxford, Oxford, pp 54–62Google Scholar
  14. Johnson HL, Duchon CE (1995) Atlas of Oklahoma climate. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendall WL (1999) Robustness of closed capture-recapture methods to violations of the closure assumption. Ecology 80:2517–2525Google Scholar
  16. Kloepfer JD, Watson SH, Mitchell JC (2006) Geographic distribution: Hemidactylus turcicus Mediterranean Gecko. Herpetol Rev 37:106–107Google Scholar
  17. LeGalliard JF, Fitze PS, Ferriére R, Clobert J (2005) Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci 50:18231–18236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Locey KJ, Stone PA (2006) Factors affecting range expansion in the introduced Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus. J Herpetol 40:526–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Locey KJ, Stone PA (2007) Hemidactylus turcicus (Mediterranean Gecko). Nesting Herpetol Rev 38:455–456Google Scholar
  20. Locey KJ, Stone PA (2008) Ontogenetic factors affecting diffusion dispersal in the introduced Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus. J Herpetol 42:593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loveridge A (1941) Certain Afro-American geckos of the genus Hemidactylus. Copeia 4:245–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly RE (2001) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NorwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCoy CJ (1970) Hemidactylus turcicus (Linnaeus), Mediterranean Gecko. Cat Am Amphib Reptil 87.1–87.2Google Scholar
  25. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioSci 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meshaka WE (1995) Reproductive cycle and colonizing ability of the Mediterranean Gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) in south-central Florida. Fla Sci 58:11–15Google Scholar
  27. Middleton J (1994) Effects of urbanization on biodiversity in Canada. In: Biodiversity in Canada: a science assessment for environment Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp. 15–20Google Scholar
  28. Nelson D, Carey S (1993) Range extensions of the Mediterranean Gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) along the northeastern gulf coast of the United States. Northeast Gulf Sci 13:53–58Google Scholar
  29. Norden AW, Norden BB (1991) The Mediterranean Gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) in Baltimore, Maryland. Md. Nat 1989, 33: 57–58Google Scholar
  30. Paulissen MA, Meyer HA (2000) The effect of toe clipping on the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus. J Herpetol 34:282–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Punzo F (2001) The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus: life in an urban landscape. Fla Sci 64:56–66Google Scholar
  32. Rödder D, Lötters S (2009) Niche shift versus niche conservatism? climatic characteristics of the native and invasive ranges of the Mediterranean house gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus). Global Ecol Biogeogr 18:674–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saenz D (1996) Dietary overview of Hemidactylus turcicus with possible implications for food partitioning. J Herpetol 30:461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savard JL, Clergeaub P, Mennechezb G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plann 48:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwanter TA, Devries A, Budge D, Schwanter D (2008) Genetic variation in founder populations of the Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus, across the southern United States. Amphib-Reptil 29:438–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Selcer KW (1986) Life history of a successful colonizer: the Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus, in southern Texas. Copeia 1986:956–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shields WM (1983) Dispersal and mating systems: investigating their causal connections. In: Chepko-Sade BD, Halpin ZT (eds) Mammalian dispersal patterns. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  38. Stabler LB, Martin CA, Brazel AJ (2005) Microclimates in a desert city were related to land use and vegetation index. Urban Forest Urban Greening 3:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutherland WJ (1996) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiebout H III, Anderson R (1996) A comparison of corridors and intrinsic connectivity to promote dispersal in transient successional landscapes. Conserv Biol 11:620–627Google Scholar
  41. Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. The New Catalyst Bioregional Series, New Society Publishers, 160 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams SC, McBrayer LD (2007) Selection of microhabitat by the introduced Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus: influence of ambient light and distance to refuge. SW Nat 52:578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Brooke Stabler
    • 1
  • Whittney L. Johnson
    • 1
  • Kenneth J. Locey
    • 2
  • Paul A. Stone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Central OklahomaEdmondUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations