Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 315–325 | Cite as

Urban impacts on tropical island streams: Some key aspects influencing ecosystem response

  • Alonso Ramírez
  • Augustin Engman
  • Keysa G. Rosas
  • Omar Perez-Reyes
  • Diana M. Martinó-Cardona
Article

Abstract

Improving our understanding of the impacts of urbanization on tropical island streams is critical as urbanization becomes a dominant feature in tropical areas. Although the “urban stream syndrome” has been successful in summarizing urban impacts on streams, the response of some island streams is different to that expected. Here we review available information on urban impacts to tropical island streams and describe unique responses to urbanization. We identified three key aspects that play particularly important or unique roles in determining tropical-island stream integrity: biotic response to water pollution, movement barriers along the stream network, and altered geomorphology that results in habitat loss. As expected, water pollution negatively impacts stream ecosystems in tropical islands and in some regions impacts can be severe, as untreated wastewaters are directly discharged into streams. While aquatic insects show the expected responses to pollution, other native fauna (e.g., shrimps and fishes) appear to be less impacted by moderate levels of pollution. Movement barriers along the stream network are especially important as much of the tropical island fauna have diadromous (either amphidromous or catadromous) life histories. Most native freshwater mollusks, shrimps, and fishes inhabiting tropical islands are diadromous and depend on unimpeded connections between freshwater and marine environments to complete their life cycles. The presence of these species in urban streams is best explained by longitudinal connectivity rather than by the degree of urban impact. Finally, in streams that remain connected to marine environments, the presence of native shrimps and fishes is strongly related to the physical habitat. Fish assemblages in channelized and severely altered stream reaches are almost completely devoid of native fauna and tend to be dominated by non-native species. In contrast, relatively diverse shrimp and fish assemblages can be found in reaches that retain their physical habitat complexity, even when they are impacted by urbanization. Our understanding of urban impacts on tropical island streams remains limited. However, the identification of key aspects can help us better understand urban impacts on streams in tropical islands, and best focus our management and research efforts to protect these unique ecosystems.

Keywords

Urban streams Tropical island urban streams Urban stream syndrome Stream pollution Longitudinal connectivity Habitat heterogeneity 

References

  1. Allan JD, Castillo MM (2007) Stream Ecology: Structure and function of running waters. Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16:1311–1318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass D (2003) A comparison of freshwater macroinvertebrate communities on small Caribbean islands. Bioscience 53:1094–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benstead JP, March JG, Pringle CM, Scatena FN (1999) Effects of a low-head dam and water abstraction on migratory tropical stream biota. Ecological Applications 9:656–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco JF, Scatena FN (2005) Floods, habitat hydraulics and upstream migration of Neritina virginea (Gastropoda: Neritidae) in Northeastern Puerto Rico. Caribbean Journal of Science 41:55–74Google Scholar
  6. Blanco JF, Scatena FN (2006) Hierarchical contribution of river-ocean connectivity, water chemistry, hydraulics and substrate to the distribution of diadromous snails in Puerto Rico streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:82–98, Blanco and Scatena, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasher AMD (2003) Impacts of human disturbances on biotic communities in Hawaiian streams. Bioscience 53:1052–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brasher AMD, Wolff RH, Luton CD (2004) Associations among land use, habitat characteristics, and invertebrate community structure in nine streams on the island of Oahu, Hawaii. United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 03–4256Google Scholar
  9. Brooker MP (1985) The ecological effects of channelization. The Geographical Journal 151:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chadwick MA, Dobberfuhl DR, Benke AC, Huryn A, Thiele JE (2006) Urbanization affects stream ecosystem function by altering hydrology, chemistry, and biotic richness. Ecological Applications 16:1796–1807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chubb AL, Zink RM, Fitzsimons JM (1998) Patterns of mtDNA variation in Hawaiian freshwater fishes: the phylogeographic consequences of amphidromy. Journal of Heredity 89:8–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen J (2008) Pipe dreams come true. Science 319:745–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Concepcion GB, Nelson SG (1999) Effects of a dam and reservoir on the distributions and densities of macrofauna in tropical streams of Guam (Mariana Islands). Journal of Freshwater Ecology 14:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook BD, Bernays S, Pringle CM, Hughes JM (2009) Marine dispersal determines the genetic population structure of migratory stream fauna of Puerto Rico: evidence for island-scale population recovery processes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:709–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Covich AP, Crowl TA, Johnson SL, Pyron M (1996) Distribution and abundance of tropical freshwater shrimp along a stream corridor: response to disturbance. Biotropica 28:484–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crook KE, Pringle CM, Freeman MC (2009) A method to assess longitudinal riverine connectivity in tropical streams dominated by migratory biota. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19:714–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cross WF, Covich AP, Crowl TA, Benstead JP, Ramírez A (2008) Secondary production, longevity and resource consumption rates of freshwater shrimps in two tropical streams with contrasting geomorphology and food web structure. Freshwater Biology 53:2504–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Jesús-Crespo R, Ramírez A (2011) Effects of urbanization on stream physicochemistry and macroinvertebrate assemblages in a tropical urban watershed in Puerto Rico. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Englund RA, Wright MG, Polhemus DA (2007) Aquatic insect taxa as indicators of aquatic species richness, habitat disturbance, and invasive species impacts in Hawaiian streams. In Evenhuis NL, Fitzsimons JM (eds) Biology of Hawaiian streams and estuaries. Bishop Museum Bulletin in Cultural and Environmental Studies 3:207–232Google Scholar
  20. Engman AC, (2011) Fish assemblage structure in urban streams of Puerto Rico: the importance of reach- and catchment-scale abiotic factors. Master thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras campusGoogle Scholar
  21. Falkland AC (1992) Small tropical islands: water resources of paradise lost, UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  22. Fièvet E (1999) An experimental survey of freshwater shrimp upstream migration in an impounded stream of Guadeloupe Island, Lesser Antilles. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 144:339–355Google Scholar
  23. Fitzsimons JM, Nishimoto RT, Devick WS (1996) Maintaining biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems on oceanic islands of the tropical pacific. Chinese Biodiversity 4:23–27Google Scholar
  24. Fitzsimons JM, Parham JE, Nishimoto RT (2002) Similarities in behavioral ecology among amphidromous and catadromous fishes on the oceanic islands of Hawai’i and Guam. Fisheries 123–129Google Scholar
  25. Ford JI, Kinzie RA III (1982) Life Crawls Upstream. Natural History 91:61–66Google Scholar
  26. Freeman M, Pringle CM, Greathouse E, Freeman B (2003) Ecosystem-level consequences of migratory faunal depletion caused by dams. In Biodiversity and Conservation of Shads Worldwide, Limburg KE, Waldman JR (eds). American Fisheries Society Series. American Fisheries Society Symposium 35:255–266Google Scholar
  27. Grau HR, Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Thomlinson JR, Helmer E, Zou X (2003) The ecological consequences of socioeconomic and land-use changes in post-agriculture Puerto Rico. Bioscience 53:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greathouse EA, Pringle CM, McDowell WH (2006) Conservation and management of migratory fauna: dams in tropical streams of Puerto Rico. Aquatic Conservation 16:695–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta A (1995) Magnitude, frequency, and special factors affecting channel form and processes in the seasonal tropics. In: Costa JE, Miller AJ, Potter KW, Wilcock PR (eds) Natural and anthropogenic influences in fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hein CL, Pike AS, Blanco JF, Covich AP, Scatena FN, Hawkins CP, Crowl TA (2011) Effects of coupled natural and anthropogenic factors on the community structure of diadromous fish and shrimp species in tropical island streams. Freshwater Biology 56:1002–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holmquist JG, Schmidt-Gengenbach JM, Yoshioka BB (1998) High dams and marine-freshwater linkages: effects on native and introduced fauna in the Caribbean. Conservation Biology 12:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joy MK, Death RG (2001) Control of freshwater fish and crayfish community structure in Taranaki, New Zealand: dams, diadromy or habitat structure? Freshwater Biology 46:417–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keith P (2003) Biology and ecology of amphidromous Gobiidae of the Indo-Pacific and the Caribbean regions. Journal of Fish Biology 63:831–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kwai Sim L, Balamurugan G (1991) Urbanization and urban water problems in southeast Asia a case of unsustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management 32:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kwak TJ, Cooney PB, Brown CH (2007) Fishery population and habitat assessment in Puerto Rico streams: phase 1 final report. San Juan, Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration, Final Report, Submitted to the Department of Natural and Environmental ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  36. Luton CD, Brasher AMD, Durkin DC, Little P (2005) Larval drift of amphidromous shrimp and gobies on the island of Oahu, Hawai’i. Micronesica 38:1–16Google Scholar
  37. Maksimovic C, Todorovic Z, Braga BPF (1993) Urban drainage problems in the humid tropics. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication 216Google Scholar
  38. March JG, Benstead JP, Pringle CM, Scatena FN (2003) Damming tropical island streams: problems, solutions, and alternatives. Bioscience 53:1069–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDowall RM (2004) Ancestry and amphidromy in island freshwater fish faunas. Fish and Fisheries 5:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDowall RM (2007) On amphidromy, a distinct form of diadromy in aquatic organisms. Fish and Fisheries 8:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDowall RM (2009) Why be amphidromous: expatrial dispersal and the place of source and sink population dynamics? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 20:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDowall RM (2010a) Why be amphidromous: expatrial dispersal and the place of source and sink population dynamics? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 20:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDowall RM (2010b) New Zealand freshwater fishes: an historical and ecological biogeography. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK (2005) Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:602–612Google Scholar
  45. Miya Y, Hamano T (1988) The influence of a dam having no fishway on the distribution of decapods crustaceans in the Yukinoura River, Nagasaki, Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 54:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montgomery MR (2008) The urban transformation of the developing world. Science 319:761–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moulton TP, Wantzen KM (2006) Conservation of tropical streams - special questions or conventional paradigms? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16:659–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norton S, Timbol AS, Parrish JD (1978) Stream channel modification in Hawaii, Part B: Effect of channelization on the distribution and abundance of fauna in selected streams. Columbia (MO): US Fish and Wildlife Service, Nation Stream Alteration Team. FWS/OBS–78/17Google Scholar
  49. Onoda Y (2009) The relative importance of substrate conditions as microhabitat determinants of a riverine benthic goby, Rhinogobius sp. OR (orange form) in runs. Limnology 10:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perez-Reyes O (1999) Abundance, diversity and life histories of freshwater decapods in Puerto Rico. Master thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras campus, San Juan, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
  52. Pringle CM (1996) Atyid shrimps (Decapoda: Atyidae) influence the spatial heterogeneity of algal communities over different scales in tropical montane streams, Puerto Rico. Freshwater Biology 35:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pringle CM (1997) Exploring how disturbance is transmitted upstream: going against the flow. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pringle CM, Blake GA (1994) Quantitative effects of atyid shrimps (Decapoda: Atyidae) on the depositional environment in a tropical stream: use of electricity for experimental exclusion. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:1443–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pringle CM, Scatena FN, Paaby-Hansen P, Nuñez-Ferrera M (2000) River conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Boon PJ, Petts GE (eds) Global perspectives on river conservation: science, policy and practice. Wiley, London, pp 39–75Google Scholar
  56. Ramírez A, Pringle CM, Wantzen KM (2008) Tropical river conservation. In: Dudgeon D (ed) Tropical stream ecology. Elsevier Science, London, pp 285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramírez A, De Jesus-Crespo R, Martinó-Cardona DM, Martinez-Rivera N, Burgos-Caraballo S (2009) Urban streams in Puerto Rico: what can we learn from the tropics? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:1070–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Resh VH (2005) Stream crossings and the conservation of diadromous invertebrates in South Pacific island streams. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roy AH, Rosemond AD, Paul MJ, Leigh DS, Wallace JB (2003) Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.). Freshwater Biology 48:329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan PA (1991) The success of Gobiidae in the tropical Pacific insular streams. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 18:25–30Google Scholar
  61. Smith GC, Covich AP, Brasher AMD (2003) An ecological perspective on the biodiversity of Tropical Island streams. Bioscience 53:1048–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strong E, Gargominy O, Ponder W, Bouchet P (2008) Global diversity of gastropods (Gastropoda; Mollusca) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taginuchi Y, Inoue M, Kawaguchi Y (2001) Stream fish habitat science and management in Japan: a review. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society 4:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Te Aroha A (2009) Restoring giant kokopu (Galaxias argenteus) populations in Hamilton’s urban streams. Master thesis, The University of WaikatoGoogle Scholar
  65. Timbol AS, Maciolek JA (1978) Stream channel modification in Hawaii, Part A: Statewide inventory of streams, habitat factors and associated Biota. Columbia (MO): US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Stream Alteration Team. FWS/OBS-78/16Google Scholar
  66. Villamil J, Clements RG (1976) Some aspects of the ecology of freshwater shrimps in the upper Espíritu Santo river at El Verde, Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico Nuclear Center, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan Puerto Rico (United States Energy Research and Development Administration). Publication 206:1–62Google Scholar
  67. Vitousek PM (1988) Diversity and biological invasions of oceanic islands. In: Wilson EO, Peter FM (eds) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 181–192Google Scholar
  68. Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:706–723Google Scholar
  69. Wenger SJ, Roy AH, Jackson CR, Bernhardt ES, Carter TL, Filoso S, Gibson CA, Hession WC, Kaushal SS, Marti E, Meyer JL, Palmer MA, Paul MJ, Purcell AH, Ramírez A, Rosemond AD, Schofield KA, Sudduth EB, Walsh CJ (2009) Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:1080–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Winemiller KO, Ponwith BJ (1998) Comparative ecology of eleotrid fishes in Central American coastal streams. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zink RM, Fitzsimons JM, Dittmann DL, Reynolds DR, Nishimoto RT (1996) Evolutionary genetics of Hawaiian freshwater fish. Copeia 2:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alonso Ramírez
    • 1
  • Augustin Engman
    • 1
  • Keysa G. Rosas
    • 1
  • Omar Perez-Reyes
    • 2
  • Diana M. Martinó-Cardona
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Tropical Ecosystem StudiesUniversity of Puerto RicoSan JuanUSA
  2. 2.Watershed Sciences Department and The Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations