Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Trees for urban environments in northern parts of Central Europe – a dendroecological study in north-east Romania and Republic of Moldavia


A limited number of species and genera currently dominate the tree stock in streets and urban sites. There has been considerable and persistent argumentation for the necessity of using a more varied and stress-tolerant selection of tree species. This paper reports results from a dendroecological study of six steppe forest reserves in north-east Romania and in the adjacent part of the Republic of Moldavia, where water stress regimes during the growing season and winter temperatures are comparable to those of inner city environments in northern parts of Central Europe and adjoining milder parts of Northern Europe (CNE-region). In each forest reserve, tree growth patterns were studied in five 20 m × 20 m plots, resulting in a total of 30 plots with an allocated area of 1.2 hectares. For all trees, height and diameter were measured and related to tree age by coring in order to detect the species growth and performance in these sites. In total 23 tree species were found, 13 of which were represented by 25 or more individuals with documented good growth in the study plots. The majority of these 13 species have very limited use in urban greenery in the CNE-region today and thus have the potential to increase the species diversity of the current urban tree population through further selection work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Brady N, Weil R (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, 960

  2. Breckle SW (2002) Walter’s vegetation of the world, 4th ed. Springer, p 527

  3. Breda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625–644

  4. Bühler O, Kristoffersen P, Larsen SU (2007) Growth of street trees in Copenhagen with emphasis on the effect of different establishment concepts. Arboric Urban For 33:330–337

  5. Craul PJ (1999) Urban soil – applications and practices. Wiley, Canada

  6. David TS, Henriques MO, Kurz-Besson C, Nunes J, Valante F, Vaz M, Pereira JS, Siegwolf R, Chaves MM, Gazarini LC, David JS (2007) Water-use strategies in two co-occurring Mediterranean evergreen oaks: surviving the summer drought. Tree Physiol 27:793–803

  7. DMI (2009) Danish meteorological institute. http://www.dmi.dk. Accessed 15 June 2010

  8. Ducatillion C, Dubois E (1997) Diversification des plantes ornimentales méditerranéennes: estimation des besoins qualitatifs des villes en arbres et arbustes (Diversification of ornamental mediterranean plants: assessment of the qualitative needs of cities concerning trees and shrubs). In: INRA (ed) La plante dans la ville. Angers, pp 139–149 (In French)

  9. Duhme F, Pauleit S (2000) The dendrofloristic richness of SE-Europe, a phenomenal treasure for urban plantings. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem 370:23–39

  10. Ehrlich R, Weinberg B (1970) An exact method for characterization of grain shape. J Sediment Res 40(1):205–212

  11. Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 731

  12. FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome

  13. Flint HL (1985) Plants showing tolerance of urban stress. J Environ Hortic 3(2):85–89

  14. Grissino-Mayer HD (2003) A manual and tutorial for the proper use of an increment borer. Tree-Ring Research 59(2):63–79

  15. Gurevitch J, Scheiner SM, Fox GA (2002) The ecology of plants. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publisher, Sunderland

  16. Jones AT, Hayes MJ, Sackville Hamilton N (2001) The effect of provenance on the performance of Crataegus monogyna in hedges. J Appl Ecol 38:952–962

  17. Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis: physical and mineralogical methods. Am Soc Agron, Agron Monogr 9(1), Madison, Wisconsin, p 1188

  18. Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press Inc, London

  19. Meeus J (1991) Astronomical algorithms. Willmann-Bell, Richmond

  20. Mijnsbrugge KV, Bischoff A, Smith B (2010) A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic Appl Ecol 11:300–311

  21. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York

  22. Pauleit S (2003) Urban street tree plantings: identifying the key requirements. Proc Inst Civ Eng-Munic Eng 156(1):43–50

  23. Pauleit S, Jones N, Garcis-Martin G, Garcia-Valdecantos JL, Riviere LM, Vidal-Beaudet L, Bodson M, Randrup TB (2002) Tree establishment practise in towns and cities – Results from a European survey. Urban For Urban Green 1(2):83–96

  24. P90 (2004) Publication P90 – Dimension public sewer pipes. Svenskt Vatten AB. Ljungföretagen. (In Swedish)

  25. Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 205–217

  26. Raupp MJ, Cumming MJ, Raupp EC (2006) Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboric Urban For 32(6):297–304

  27. Richards NA (1983) Diversity and stability in a street tree population. Urban Ecol 7:159–171

  28. Roloff A, Korn S, Gillner S (2009) The climate-species-matrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change. Urban For Urban Green 8:295–308

  29. Sæbø A, Zelimir B, Ducatillion C, Hatzistathis A, Lagerström T, Supuka J, Garcis-Valdecantos JL, Rego F, Slycken J (2005) The selection of plant materials for street trees, park trees and urban woodlands In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 257–280

  30. Sieghardt M, Mursch-Radlgruber E, Paoletti Couenberg E, Dimitrakopoulus A, Rego F, Hatzistatthis A, Randrup T (2005) The abiotic urban environment: impact of urban growing conditions on urban vegetation. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 281–323

  31. Sims JR, Haby VA (1971) Simplified colorimetric determination of soil organic matter. Soil Sci 112:137–141

  32. Sîrbu C (2003) Podgoriile Cotnari, Iasi si Husi. Studiu Botanic. (The vineyards of Cotnari, Iasi and Husi. A botanic approach). Ion Ionescu de la Brad, Iasi, p 372. (In Romania)

  33. Sperry JS, Adler FR, Campbell GS, Comstock JP (1998) Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model. Plant Cell Environ 21:347–359

  34. Swedish Forestry Agency (2010) Forest conservation law (Skogsvårds Lagstiftningen – In Swedish), Skogsstyrelsen

  35. Sun WQ (1992) Quantifying species diversity of streetside trees in our cities. J Arboric 18(2):91–93

  36. Takhtajan A (1986) Floristic atlas of the world. University of California Press, Berkleley

  37. Tan KH (2005) Soil sampling, preparation and analysis, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Florida, USA

  38. Tello M-L, Tomalak M, Siwecki R, Gaper J, Motta E, Mateo-Sagasta E (2005) Biotic urban growing condition – threats, pests and diseases. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, pp 325–365

  39. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward rational classification on climate. Geogr Rev 38(1):55–94

  40. Ursu A (2005) Natura rezervaţiei Plaiul Fagului (The Plaiul Fagului Nature Reserve). Agenţia pentru silvicultură “Moldsilva”. Academia de Ştiinţe a Republicii Moldova, p 431. (In Romanian)

  41. US EPA (2009) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/heatislands/

  42. Ware GH (1994) Ecological bases for selecting urban trees. J Arboric 20(2):98–103

  43. West AG, Hultine KR, Jackson TL, Ehleringer JR (2007) Differential summer water use by Pinus edulis and Juniperus osteosperma reflects contrasting hydraulic characteristics. Tree Physiol 27:1711–1720

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Henrik Sjöman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjöman, H., Nielsen, A.B. & Oprea, A. Trees for urban environments in northern parts of Central Europe – a dendroecological study in north-east Romania and Republic of Moldavia. Urban Ecosyst 15, 267–281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0187-2

Download citation


  • Dendroecology
  • Habitat studies
  • Site-adapted species use
  • Tree selection
  • Urban sites