Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 569–583 | Cite as

The effect of fragmentation on the threatened plant community Coastal Moonah Woodland in Victoria, Australia

Article

Abstract

Coastal vegetation is under increasing pressure with the expansion of urban developments, tourism, population and changing climates. This study sought to examine the effects of fragmentation on the threatened plant community, Coastal Moonah Woodland, in southern Victoria, Australia. We examined the effects on community composition of surrounding land use (urban, rural, native vegetation), remnant size and environmental attributes at three spatial scales. At larger scales, geographic and environmental attributes, such as annual rainfall and temperature, were important drivers of community composition. At finer scales, remnant size, disturbance, weed invasion, connectivity, and immediate surrounding land use impacted more on community composition. At these scales, increasing native vegetation cover in the landscape, remnant connectivity and size positively influenced community composition. If coastal development continues at the current rate, all but a few remnants of this community will be surrounded by the urban landscape. Thus, planning for the integration of these remnants in the urban landscape through long-term management plans and community involvement is essential for the survival of these remnants.

Keywords

Coastal Woodlands Melaleuca lanceolata Vegetation condition Fragmentation Land use change Biodiversity planning 

References

  1. Bastin L, Thomas CD (1999) The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landsc Ecol 14:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calder W (1986) Peninsula Perspectives. Vegetation on the Mornington Peninsula, Victoria. Hedges and Bell, PL, Sponsored by National Heritage Trust of Australia (Victoria), Victorian State GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clements A (1983) Suburban development and resultant changes in the vegetation of the bush land of the Northern Sydney region. Aust J Ecol 8:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coates F, Sutter G, Mavromihalis J (2006) Regeneration of treeless subalpine vegetation after recurrent fires at Mt Buffalo National Park. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Technical Report No. 160. Department of Sustainability and Environment, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  6. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DSE (2002) Flora and Fauna Guarantee Action Statement #141 Coastal Moonah Woodland. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  8. DSE (2004) EVC/Bioregion Benchmark for vegetation quality assessment. 1—Bridgewater Bioregion. 2—Gippsland Plain Bioregion, 3—Otway Plain Bioregion. EVC 858: Coastal Alkaline Scrub (syn. Calcarenite Dune Woodland). Department of Sustainability and Environment, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  9. ESRI (2002) Arc view Version 3.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foulkes JN, Heard LMB (eds) (2003) A biological survey of the South East, South Australia. 1991 and 1997. Department for Environment and Heritage, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutenspergen GR, Levenson JB (1997) Under storey plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land-use gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ (2006) Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne’s urban-rural gradient. Landsc Urban Plan 78:435–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ (2007) Composition of the plant community in remnant patches of grassy woodland along an urban-rural gradient in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Ecosyst 10:355–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs E (1988) Using ordination to analyse the composition and structure of urban forest islands. For Ecol Manag 23:139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (2003) Turner review no. 7 impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant populations: generalising the idiosyncratic. Aust J Bot 51:471–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kantvilas G, Minchin P (1989) An analysis of epiphytic lichen communities in Tasmanian cool temperate rainforest. Vegetatio 84:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kemper J, Cowling RM, Richardson DM (1999) Fragmentation of South African renosterveld shrub lands: effects on plant community structure and conservation implications. Biol Conserv 90:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loewenstein NJ, Lowenstein EF (2005) Non-native plants in the under storey of riparian forests across a land use gradient in the Southeast. Urban Ecosyst 8:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lunt ID, Sponner PG (2005) Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes. J Biogeogr 32:1859–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  22. Minchin P (2005) DECODA version 3 b38. Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University, EdwardsvilleGoogle Scholar
  23. Moffatt SF, McLachlan SM (2004) Under storey indicators of disturbance for riparian forests along an urban-rural gradient in Manitoba. Ecol Indic 4:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moxham C, Turner V (2009) A journey through Coastal Moonah Woodland in Victoria. Vic Nat 126(5):169–178Google Scholar
  25. Moxham C, Cheal D, Turner V (2009) Defining the floristic community Coastal Moonah Woodland in the Gippsland Plain Bioregion. Vic Nat 126:36–43Google Scholar
  26. Ough K (2001) Regeneration of wet forest flora a decade after clear-felling or wildfire—is there a difference? Aust J Bot 49:645–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. PRIMER-E (2001) PRIMER 5 for windows Version 5.2.4. PRIMER-E Ltd, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  28. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SAC (1998) Final recommendation on a nomination for listing: Coastal Moonah (Melaleuca lanceolata ssp. lanceolata) Woodland Community (Nomination 460). Scientific advisory committee, Flora and Fauna Guarantee. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  31. Specht RL, Specht A (1999) Australian plant communities: dynamics of structure, growth and biodiversity. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  32. Stenhouse RN (2004) Fragmentation and internal disturbance of native vegetation reserves in the Perth metropolitan areas, Western Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 68:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tonkinson D, Taranto M, Kefford E (2003) Report on mapping and condition assessment of remnant native vegetation for the Mornington Peninsula Shire. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  34. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. VCC (2002) Victorian coastal strategy. Victorian Coastal Council, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  36. Walsh NG, Stajsic V (2007) A census of the vascular plants of Victoria, 8th edn. National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams NSG, Morgan JW, McDonnell MJ, McCarthy MA (2005) Plant traits and local extensions in natural grasslands along an urban-rural gradient. J Ecol 93:1203–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Rights of Australia 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sustainability and EnvironmentThe Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental ResearchHeidelbergAustralia

Personalised recommendations