Abstract
Human choices regarding land cover management practices may influence ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces. We conducted a 2-year study to compare biological (weed, insect, and disease), aesthetic (lawn quality), and economic (lawn care program cost) attributes of an integrated pest management (IPM) program, in which pesticides are applied on the basis of treatment thresholds, with a standard program, in which pesticides are applied on a calendar basis without pest monitoring. Both programs were managed by a professional lawn care operator. Although weed incidence was low, the IPM program had significantly more lawns with weed presence than the standard program during 2005 and 2006. However, only 21% of the IPM lawns required herbicide applications in 2005, and none exceeded the treatment threshold (5% weed cover) in 2006 as compared to 100% of the standard program lawns being treated for weeds in both years. The IPM program also had significantly more lawns with insect damage than the standard program during June 2005 and August 2005, but not September 2005 and throughout 2006. Only 28% of the IPM lawns required insecticide applications in 2005 and none exceeded the threshold (5% insect damage) in 2006 whereas all of the lawns in the standard program received insecticide treatments in both years. Rhizoctonia blight was present on some of the lawns, but was not a common problem. Although lawn quality was high for both programs (>8, on a scale of 1–9), it was significantly higher for standard than for IPM program lawns during 2005, and June 2006 and September 2006, but not August 2006. The annual lawn management costs were lower for the IPM ($281.50) than the standard program ($458.06). Thirty one percent of the IPM program customers who continued with the study in 2006 did so because they were satisfied with the IPM program. Among those who did not continue with the program, 33% cited weed or insect problems, while 33% expected better results. The implications of these findings for implementation of IPM in professional lawn care are further discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alumai A, Salminen SO, Richmond DS, Cardina J, Grewal PS (2008) Comparative evaluation of aesthetic, biological, and economic effectiveness of different lawn management programs. Urban Ecosyst (in press)
Baker L, Brazel A, Bryne L, Felton A, Grove M, Hill H, Nelson KC, Walker J, Shandas V (2007) Effects of human choices on characteristics of urban ecosystems. Bull Ecol Soc Am (October):404–409
Ball J (1987) Efficient monitoring for an urban IPM program. J Arboric 13:174–177
Beard JB, Green RL (1994) The role of turfgrass in environmental protection and their benefit to humans. J Environ Qual 23:452–460
Blaine TW, Clayton S, Robbins P, Grewal PS, Power K, Yoder C (2006) Ohio homeowners’ attitudes and practices related to use of lawn chemicals. Urban Landscape Ecology Program Research Update 2006. The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
Bormann FH, Balmori D, Geballe GT, Vernegaard L (1993) Redesigning the American lawn. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 256
Byrne LB, Bruns MA, Kim KC (2008) Ecosystem properties of urban land covers at the abover-ground-belowground interface. Ecosystems (N Y, Print) 11:1065–1077. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9179-3
Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework of classification. Front Ecol Environ 5:80–88. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007) 5[80:SHIUER]2.0.CO;2
Cheng Z, Richmond DS, Salminen SO, Grewal PS (2008) Ecology of urban lawns under three common management programs. Urban Ecosyst 11:177–195. doi:10.1007/s11252-008-0048-9
Clayton S (2007) Domesticated nature: Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. J Environ Psychol 27:215–224. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.001
Grewal PS (2007) The value of the American lawn. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Special Circular, p 194
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760. doi:10.1126/science.1150195
Grimm NB, Grove MJ, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
Hellman JL, Davidson JA, Holmes J (1982) Urban integrated pest management in Maryland. In: Niemczyk HD, Joiner BG (eds) Turfgrass Entomology. Hammer Graphics, Picqua, OH, pp 68–74
Jenkins VS (1994) The Lawn: a History of an American Obsession. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, p 246
Milesi C, Running SW, Elvidge CD, Dietz JB, Tuttle BT, Nemani RR (2005) Mapping and modeling the biochemical cycling of turfgrass in the United States. Environ Manage 36:426–438. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0316-2
Minitab (2006) Minitab version 15.1 for Windows. Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA
National Turfgrass Federation (2003) The turfgrass industry – present and future. In: The National Turfgrass Research Initiative. National Turfgrass Federation, Beltsville, Maryland, pp 5–7
Niemczyk HD, Shetlar DJ (2000) Destructive Turf Insects, 2nd edn. HDN Books, Wooster, OH, p 148
Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Nature 269:331–334
Raupp MJ, Davidson JA, Holmes JJ, Hellman JL (1985) The concept of key plants in integrated pest management for landscapes. J Arboric 11:317–322
Raupp MJ, Noland RM (1984) Implementing plant management programs in residential and institutional settings. J Arboric 10:161–169
Ravlin FW, Robinson WH (1985) Audience for residential turfgrass pest management programs. Bull Entomol Soc Am 31:45–50
Robbins P, Birkenholtz T (2003) Turfgrass revolution: The ecology of urban sprawl. Land use policy 20:181–194. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00006-1
Robbins P, Polderman A-M, Birkenholtz T (2001) Lawns and toxins: An ecology of the city. Cities Intern J Urban Policy Plann 18:369–380
SPSS (2005) SPSS Release 14.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Pesticide industry sales and usage report (http://www.epa.gov/opphead1/pestsales/99pestsales). Accessed on February 18, 2008
United States Geological Survey (1999) The quality of our nation’s waters – nutrients and pesticides. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1225, Reston, Virginia, USA
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the North Central Integrated Pest Management (NCIPM) grants program. We thank Dr. Thomas W. Blaine and Mr. Kevin Power for their technical support and invaluable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alumai, A., Grunkemeyer, M., Kovach, J. et al. Implementing integrated pest management in professional lawn care: a case study. Urban Ecosyst 13, 37–49 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0102-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0102-2