Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 321–337

Effects of urbanization on butterfly species richness, guild structure, and rarity

  • Peter J. Clark
  • J. Michael Reed
  • Frances S. Chew
Article

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of landscape characteristics associated with urbanization, as well as local features, on butterfly species richness at four spatial scales (50, 150, 500, and 1,000 m from survey plots). We also evaluated these effects separately by butterfly guilds based on their region-wide rarity and on degree of specialization. The distribution of abundances of the 44 species observed showed an excess of uncommon species compared to a log-normal distribution, and the two most abundant species were exotic (Thymelicus lineola and Pieris rapae). We used an information theoretic approach to model selection to determine the most important correlates of butterfly species richness. Models of mean butterfly richness per visit explained greater variance than did models of cumulative richness across the season. Cumulative butterfly species richness was affected more at larger spatial scales, while richness per visit was affected similarly at all spatial scales. The most consistent local factor affecting butterfly diversity was the number of nectar producing plants that were flowering. The most consistent landscape-level correlates of species richness were number of people (at small spatial scales) and green space. Measures of increased urbanization were associated with decreased butterfly species richness, and rare and specialized species were most affected. Species that were regionally rare, and those that specialized both in host plants and had few broods, disappeared with declining richness across sites 2.9–4.5 times faster than did generalists and less restricted specialists.

Keywords

Species diversity Urbanization Sprawl Lepidoptera Habitat specialist 

References

  1. Alaruikka D, Kotze DJ, Matveinen K, Niemela J (2002) Carabid beetle and spider assemblages along a forested urban-rural gradient in southern Finland. J Insect Conserv 6:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastin L (1999) The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landsc Ecol 14:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair RB (1999) Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol Appl 9:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadian Forest Service (2003) The great ice storm of 1998. Available at Natural Resources Canada, http://www.health.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/MixedwoodPlains/iceStorm_e.html
  9. Chew FS (1981) Coexistence and local extinction in two Pierid butterflies. Am Nat 118:655–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark PJ, Reed JM, Tavernia BG, Windmiller BS, Regosin JV (2007) Urbanization effects on spotted salamander and wood frog presence and abundance. Herpetol Conserv 3 (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Collinge SK, Prudic KL, Oliver JC (2003) Effects of local habitat characteristics and landscape context on grassland butterfly diversity. Conserv Biol 17:178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodd T (1999) Checklist of the butterflies of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Butterfly Club, Upton, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrlich PR, Breedlove DE, Brussard PF, Sharp MA (1972) Weather and the regulation of subalpine populations. Ecology 53:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erickson DL (2004) Connecting corridors: implementing metropolitan greenway networks in North America. In: Jongman R, Pungetti G (eds) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 200–221Google Scholar
  15. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1998) Ice storm overview. Available at FEMA, http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=10487 (Accessed 24 January 2005)
  16. Forbes WTM (1960) Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states part IV: agaristidae through nymphalidae including butterflies. New York State College of Agriculture, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Fordyce JA, Nice CC (2003) Variation in butterfly egg adhesion: adaptation to local host plant senescence characteristics? Ecol Lett 6:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Germaine SS, Wakeling BF (2001) Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biol Conserv 97:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibb H, Hochuli DF (2002) Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biol Conserv 106:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbs JP (1998) Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. Landsc Ecol 13:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibbs JP, Stanton EJ (2001) Habitat fragmentation and arthropod community change: carrion beetles, phoretic mites, and flies. Ecol Appl 11:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glassberg J (1999) Butterflies through binoculars: the east. Oxford University Press, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Green DM, Baker MG (2003) Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem. Landsc Urban Plan 63:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagan JM, Meehan AL (2002) The effectiveness of stand-level and landscape-level variables for explaining bird occurrence in an industrial forest. Forest Sci 48:231–242Google Scholar
  25. Hall RI, Leavitt PR, Quinian R, Dixit AS, Smol JP (1999) Effects of agriculture, urbanization, and climate on water quality in the northern Great Plains. Limnol Oceanogr 44:739–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am Nat 161:40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hogsden KL, Hutchinson TC (2004) Butterfly assemblages along a human disturbance gradient in Ontario, Canada. Can J Zool 82:739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Homan RN, Windmiller BS, Reed JM (2004) Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss for two vernal pool-breeding amphibians. Ecol Appl 14:1547–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hostetler ME, Knowles-Yanez K (2003) Land use, scale, and bird distributions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landsc Urban Plan 62:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howe WH (1975) The butterflies of North America. Doubleday, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Ishitani M, Kotze DJ, Niemela J (2003) Changes in carabid beetle assemblages across an urban-rural gradient in Japan. Ecography 26:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jedrzejewski W, Niedzialkowska M, Nowak S, Jedrzejewska B (2004) Habitat variables associated with wolf (Canis lupus) distribution and abundance in northern Poland. Divers Distrib 10:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keeler MS, Chew FS, Goodale BC, Reed JM (2006) Modeling the impacts of two exotic invasive species on a native butterfly: top-down vs. bottom-up effects. J Anim Ecol 75:777–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kerr JT, Sugar A, Packer L (2000) Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conserv Biol 14:1726–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kitahara M, Fujii K (1994) Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: an analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. specialist strategies. Res Popul Ecol 36:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitahara M, Fujii K (1997) An island biogeographic approach to the analysis of butterfly community patterns in newly designed parks. Res Popul Ecol 39:23–35Google Scholar
  37. Kitahara M, Sei K, Fujii K (2000) Patterns in the structure of grassland butterfly communities along a gradient of human disturbance: further analysis based on the generalist/specialist concept. Popul Ecol 42:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klots AB (1951) A field guide to the butterflies. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  39. Kocher SD, Williams EH (2000) The diversity and abundance of North American butterflies vary with habitat disturbance and geography. J Biogeogr 27:785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Layberry RA, Hall, PW, Lafontaine JD (1998) The butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee P, Ding T, Hsu F, Geng S (2004) Breeding bird species richness in Taiwan: distribution on gradients of elevation, primary productivity and urbanization. J Biogeogr 31:307–314Google Scholar
  42. Lovett-Doust J, Biernacki M, Page R, Chan M, Natgunarajah R, Timis G (2003) Effects of land ownership and landscape-level factors on rare-species richness in natural areas of southern Ontario, Canada. Landsc Ecol 18:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  44. McIntyre NE, Hostetler ME (2001) Effects of urban land use on pollinator (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic Appl Ecol 2:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mckenna DD, Mckenna KM, Malcom SB, Berenbaum MR (2001) Mortality of Lepidoptera along roadways in central Illinois. J Lepid Soc 55:63–68Google Scholar
  46. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7:5. Availabe at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol7/iss1/art5/ Google Scholar
  48. Miller JR, Wiens JA, Hobbs NT, Thompson N, Theobald DM (2003) Effects of human settlement on bird communities in lowland riparian areas of Colorado (USA). Ecol Appl 13:1041–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niemela J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J, Hartley D, de Oca EM (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landsc Ecol 17:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. North American Butterfly Association (1995) Checklist and English names of North American butterflies. North American Butterfly Association, Morristown, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  51. Opler PA, Malikul V (1998) A field guide to eastern butterflies. Houghton Mifflin, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Opler PA, Pavulaan H, Stanford, RE (1995) Butterflies of North America. Avaliable at http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/distr/lepid/bflyusa/bflyusa.htm (version 12DEC2003)
  53. Pearson DL, Carroll SS (1998) Global patterns of species richness: spatial models for conservation planning using bioindicator and precipitation data. Conserv Biol 12:809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pizl V, Josens G (1995) Earthworm communities along a gradient of urbanization. Environ Pollut 90:7–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pollard E (1977) Method for assessing changes in abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 205–217Google Scholar
  57. Rabinowitz D, Cairns S, Dillon T (1986) Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 182–204Google Scholar
  58. Reed JM (1992) A system for ranking conservation priorities for Neotropical migrant birds based on relative risk to extinction. In: Hagan III JM, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 524–536Google Scholar
  59. Riley SPD, Sauvajot RM, Fuller TK, York EC, Kamradt DA, Bromley C, Wayne RK (2003) Effects of urbanization and habitat fragmentation on bobcats and coyotes in southern California. Conserv Biol 17:566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robbins CS (1980) Effect of forest fragmentation on breeding bird populations in the Piedmont of the mid-Atlantic region. Atl Nat 33:31–36Google Scholar
  61. Robbins RK, Opler PA (1997) Butterfly diversity and a preliminary comparison with bird and mammal diversity. In: Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO (eds) Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, pp 69–82Google Scholar
  62. Ruszczyk A (1986) Distribution and abundance of butterflies in the urbanization zones of Porto Alegre Brazil. J Res Lepid 25:157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruszczyk A, DeAraujo AM (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J Lepid Soc 46:255–264Google Scholar
  64. SAS Institute (2004) SAS statistics. Version 9. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  65. Schneider C (2003) The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecol Entomol 28:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shochat E, Stefanov WL, Whitehouse MEA, Faeth SH (2004) Urbanization and spider diversity: influences of human modification of habitat structure and productivity. Ecol Appl 14:268–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Singer MC (1972) Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony. Science 173:75–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stefanescu C, Herrando S, Paramo F (2004) Butterfly species richness in the north-west Mediterranean Basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors. J Biogeogr 31:905–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Summerville K, Crist TO (2001) Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation on patch use by butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera). Ecology 82:1360–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME, Clarke RT (1998) Effects of latitude, altitude, and climate on the habitat and conservation of the endangered butterfly Maculinea arion and its Myrmica ant hosts. J Insect Conserv 2:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Venn SJ, Kotze DJ, Niemela J (2003) Urbanization effects on carabid diversity in boreal forests. Eur J Entomol 100:73–80Google Scholar
  73. Villard M, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13:774–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wade TG, Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Jones KB (2003) Distribution and causes of global forest fragmentation. Conserv Ecol 7(2):7. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss2/art7 Google Scholar
  75. Wang Y, Moskovits DK (2001) Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and changes in land cover: applications of Landsat data for conservation in an urban landscape (Chicago Wilderness). Conserv Biol 15:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weiss SB, Murphy DD, White RR (1988) Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology 69:1486–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weller B, Ganzhorn J (2004) Carabid beetle community composition, body size, and fluctuating asymmetry along an urban–rural gradient. Basic Appl Ecol 5:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Clark
    • 1
  • J. Michael Reed
    • 1
  • Frances S. Chew
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations