Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 255–274 | Cite as

Habitat structure: A fundamental concept and framework for urban soil ecology

  • Loren B. ByrneEmail author


Habitat structure is defined as the composition and arrangement of physical matter at a location. Although habitat structure is the physical template underlying ecological patterns and processes, the concept is relatively unappreciated and underdeveloped in ecology. However, it provides a fundamental concept for urban ecology because human activities in urban ecosystems are often targeted toward management of habitat structure. In addition, the concept emphasizes the fine-scale, on-the-ground perspective needed in the study of urban soil ecology. To illustrate this, urban soil ecology research is summarized from the perspective of habitat structure effects. Among the key conclusions emerging from the literature review are: (1) habitat structure provides a unifying theme for multivariate research about urban soil ecology; (2) heterogeneous urban habitat structures influence soil ecological variables in different ways; (3) more research is needed to understand relationships among sociological variables, habitat structure patterns and urban soil ecology. To stimulate urban soil ecology research, a conceptual framework is presented to show the direct and indirect relationships among habitat structure and ecological variables. Because habitat structure serves as a physical link between sociocultural and ecological systems, it can be used as a focus for interdisciplinary and applied research (e.g., pest management) about the multiple, interactive effects of urbanization on the ecology of soils.


Habitat structure Urban ecology Urban soils Lawn Mulches Microclimate 


  1. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avondet JL, Blair RB, Berg DJ, Ebbert MA (2003) Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) responses to changes in ecological parameters across an urban gradient. Environ Ent 32:347–358Google Scholar
  3. Baker LA, Hope D, Xu Y, Edmonds J, Lauver L (2001) Nitrogen balance for the Central-Phoenix (CAP) Ecosystem. Ecosystems 4:582–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck MW (2000) Separating the elements of habitat structure: independent effects of habitat complexity and structural components on rocky intertidal gastropods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 249:29–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (1990) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolger DT, Suarez AV, Crooks KR, Morrison SA, Case TJ (2000) Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: area, age and edge effects. Ecol Apps 10:1230–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornstein RD (1968) Observations of the urban heat island effect in New York City. J App Meteor 7:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bramen SK, Pendley AF, Corley W (2002) Influence of commercially available wildflower mixes on beneficial arthropod abundance and predation in turfgrass. Environ Entomol 31:564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne LB (2005) Of looks, laws and lawns: how human aesthetic preferences influence landscape management, public policies and urban ecosystems. In: Laband DN (ed) Emerging issues along urban–rural interfaces: linking science and society. Center for Forest Sustainability, Auburn University, Auburn GA, pp 42–46Google Scholar
  10. Byrne LB (2006) Effects of urban habitat types and landscape patterns on ecological variables at the aboveground–belowground interface. PhD dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Available online: Google Scholar
  11. Byrne LB, Bruns MA (2004) The effects of lawn management on soil microarthropods. J Ag Urban Ent 21:150–156Google Scholar
  12. Carreiro MM, Howe K, Parkhurst DF, Pouyat RV (1999) Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban–rural gradient. Biol Fert Soils 30:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Celestian SB, Martin CA (2004) Rhizosphere, surface, and air temperature patterns at parking lots in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. J Arboriculture 30:245–251Google Scholar
  14. Craul PJ (1985) A description of urban soils and their desired characteristics. J Arboriculture 11:330–339Google Scholar
  15. Eviner VT (2004) Plant traits that influence ecosystem processes vary independently among species. Ecology 85:2215–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faeth SH, Kane TC (1978) Urban biogeography: city parks as islands for Diptera and Coleoptera. Oecologia 32:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faeth SH, Warren PS, Shochat E, Masussich WA (2005) Trophic dynamics in urban communities. Bioscience 55:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geiger R, Aron RH, Todhunter P (2003) The climate near the ground, 6th edn. Rowman and Littlefieldf, Lanham, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibb H, Hochuli DF (2002) Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological Conservation 106:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Golubiewski NE (2006) Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado’s Front Range. Ecol App 16:555–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green DM, Oleksyszyn M (2002) Enzyme activities and carbon dioxide flux in a Sonoran Desert urban ecosystem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:2002–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groffman PM, Law NL, Belt KT, Band LW, Fisher GT (2004) Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems 7:393–403Google Scholar
  24. Grove JM, Troy AR, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Burch WR Jr, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2006) Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 9:578–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guerra M, Walker E, Jones C, Paskewitz S, Cortinas MR, Stancil A, Beck L, Bobo M, Kitron U (2003) Predicting the risk of lyme disease: habitat suitability for Ixodes scapularis in the North Central United States. Emerg Infect Diseases 8:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halverson HG, Heisler GM (1981) Soil temperatures under urban trees and asphalt. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-481. Northeast. For. Exp. Stn., Broomall, PAGoogle Scholar
  27. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. PNAS 100:8788–8792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hope D, Zhu W, Gries C, Oleson J, Kaye J, Grimm NB, Baker LA (2005) Spatial variation in soil inorganic nitrogen across an arid urban ecosystem. Urban Ecosyst 8:251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaye JP, Burke IC, Mosier AR, Guerschman JP (2004) Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from urban soils to the atmosphere. Ecol App 14:975–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaye JP, McCulley RL, Burke IC (2005) Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agricultural ecosystems. Global Change Biol 11:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaye JP, Groffman PM, Grimm NB, Baker LA, Pouyat RV (2006) A distinct urban biogeochemistry? Trends Ecol Evol 21:192–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Korthals GW, Milauer P, van Dijk C, van der Putten WH (2001) Linking above- and below-ground biodiversity: abundance and trophic complexity in soil as a response to experimental plant communities on abandoned arable land. Funct Ecol 15:506–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Langellotto GA, Denno RF (2004) Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Law NL, Band LE, Grove JM (2004) Nitrogen input from residential lawn care practices in suburban watersheds in Baltimore County, MD. J Environ Plan Man 47:737–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorenz K, Kandeler E (2005) Biochemical characterization of urban soil profiles from Stuttgart, Germany. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1373–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG, Weathers KC (eds) (2005) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin CA, Warren PS, Kinzig AP (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Land Urban Plan 69:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCoy ED, Bell SS (1990) Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky, HR (eds) Habitat Structure: The physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  40. McCoy ED, Bell SS, Mushinsky HR (1990) Habitat structure: synthesis and perspectives. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 427–430Google Scholar
  41. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McIntyre NE, Rango J, Fagan WF, Faeth SH (2001) Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc Urban Plann 52:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milesi C, Elvidge CD, Nemani RR, Running SW (2003) Assessing the impact of urban land development on net primary productivity in the southeastern United States. Remote Sensing Environ 86:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miyashita T, Shinkai A, Takafumi C (1998) The effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areas. Biol Conserv 86:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Montague T, Kjelgren R (2004) Energy balance of six common landscape surfaces and the influence of surface properties on gas exchange of four containerized tree species. Scientia Horticulturae 100:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mueller EC, Day TA (2005) The effect of ground cover on microclimate, growth and leaf gas exchange of oleander in Phoenix, Arizona. Int J Biometeorol 49:244–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nassauer JI (1995) Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14:161–170Google Scholar
  48. Natuhara Y, Imai C, Takeda H (1994) Classification and ordination of communities of soil arthropods in an urban park in Osaka City. Ecol Res 9:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nuhn TP, Wright CG (1979) An ecological survey of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a landscaped suburban habitat. Am Midland Nat 102:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostfeld RS, Hazler KR, Cepeda OM (1996) Temporal and spatial dynamics of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in a rural landscape. J Med Entomol 33:90–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pavao-Zuckerman MA, Coleman DC (2005) Decomposition of chestnut oak (Quercus prinus) leaves and nitrogen mineralization in an urban environment. Biol Fert Soils 41:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pickett STA, Burch WR, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pouyat R, Groffman P, Yesilonis I, Hernandez L (2002) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environ Pollution 116:S107–S118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rebek EJ, Sadof CS, Hanks LM (2005) Manipulating the abundance of natural enemies in ornamental landscapes with floral resource plants. Biol Control 33:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scharenbroch BC, Lloyd JE, Johnson-Maynard JL (2005) Distinguishing urban soils with physical, chemical, and biological properties. Pedobiologia 49:283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shochat E, Stefanov WL, Whitehouse MEA, Faeth SH (2004) Urbanization and spider diversity: influences of human modification of habitat structure and productivity. Ecol App 14:268–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From population patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shrewsbury PM, Lashomb JH, Hamilton GC, Zhang J, Patts JM, Casagrande RA (2004) The influence of flowering plants on herbivore and natural enemy abundance in ornamental landscapes. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 30:23–33Google Scholar
  59. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92Google Scholar
  60. Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KJ (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Veg Sci 14:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wall DH (ed) (2004) Sustaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Soils and Sediments. Island, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  62. Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitney GG, Adams SD (1980) Man as a maker of new plant communities. J App Ecology 17:431–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolfe BE, Kilronomos JN (2005) Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. BioScience 55:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhu W, Carreiro MM (2004) Temporal and spatial variation in nitrogen transformations in deciduous forest ecosystems along an urban–rural gradient. Soil Biol Bochem 36:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in EcologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyRoger Williams UniversityBristolUSA

Personalised recommendations